Mad as Hell Doctors Tour

**elganned** · October-09-09, 05:25 PM

Okay, so the Mad As Hell Docs are [[gasp!) biased in favor of the Obama plan. That's perfectly obvious to the most casual observer, and I don't see that they've made any attempt to hide it. So what exactly is your point, Cc?

**Detroitej72** · October-09-09, 06:28 PM

Originally Posted by ccbatson

Proof? Glen Beck exposed it last night

Glen Beck is unable to have any credibility because he is a right wing hack. Why don't you just use the Republican Party as a source, if you want to play the partisan angle.

Find someone without a political agenda to use as a source, not some right wing buffoon.

**Pam** · October-09-09, 06:48 PM

Originally Posted by elganned

Okay, so the Mad As Hell Docs are [[gasp!) biased in favor of the Obama plan. That's perfectly obvious to the most casual observer, and I don't see that they've made any attempt to hide it. So what exactly is your point, Cc?

No, actually they support a single payer universal coverage plan and since they were not invited to the speech this should show once again that Obama is not on the far left, despite the repeated name calling of Batts and pals.

ccbatson · October-09-09, 11:50 PM

Pam...you just admitted that Obama is playing deceptive politics. He doesn't invite a group because they are pro single payer [[as is Obama, in case you haven't seen his speeches where he explicitly says so..in 2005 and 2007) in order to avoid the public perceiving the truth.

Good catch Pam, although I am not sure you knew what you were catching.

**elganned** · October-10-09, 08:44 AM

First Obama is a lying SOB because he invites the group, then when it's shown that's not true he's a lying SOB because he doesn't invite the group. Obama delenda est!

You just love having it both ways, I see.

ccbatson · October-24-09, 10:22 PM

What is not to love about exposing the corruptions of liberal fascism.

**rb336** · October-26-09, 07:19 AM

Bats, your delusions are really running rampant these days. your posts require redefining virtually every other word

ccbatson · October-26-09, 08:24 PM

Classic Rb..he doesn't even identify what he is referring too, let alone provide any coherent rational arguments in favor of his position.

Lorax · October-26-09, 08:27 PM

Originally Posted by ccbatson

Classic Rb..he doesn't even identify what he is referring too, let alone provide any coherent rational arguments in favor of his position.

He didn't think he needed to, since the assumption that those participating in this forum are posting while awake.

Not posting while batty.

ccbatson · October-26-09, 08:28 PM

Try that in a formal debate sometime libs.

Lorax · October-26-09, 08:47 PM

For you, a formal debate would require you to wear a tuxedo.

**elganned** · October-27-09, 07:14 AM

Originally Posted by ccbatson

What is not to love about exposing the corruptions of liberal fascism.

And what is not to love about our resident Obama-hater villifying him for doing something and then, when shown to be wrong, villifying him for not doing that very thing. Obama delenda est!

You never fail to amuse, Cc.

**rb336** · October-27-09, 12:36 PM

Originally Posted by ccbatson

Classic Rb..he doesn't even identify what he is referring too, let alone provide any coherent rational arguments in favor of his position.

when the post being referred to is the one immediately preceding it, only a moron would be unable to follow

ccbatson · October-27-09, 06:43 PM

If it were a one time occurrence Rb, maybe, but it is your pattern to make vague comments without adequate support to make your argument.

Lorax · October-27-09, 11:11 PM

Originally Posted by ccbatson

If it were a one time occurrence Rb, maybe, but it is your pattern to make vague comments without adequate support to make your argument.

You're talking about yourself here, right?

**East Detroit** · October-28-09, 12:04 AM

Originally Posted by ccbatson

If it were a one time occurrence Rb, maybe, but it is your pattern to make vague comments without adequate support to make your argument.

Irony, thy name is ccBatson.

**rb336** · October-28-09, 08:14 AM

bats was extra-funny on that one, wasn't he?

Lorax · October-28-09, 08:59 AM

Yes, delightfully tacky, yet somehow unrefined.

ccbatson · October-30-09, 12:13 AM

Now, now children, time to get back to work.

Lorax · October-30-09, 08:48 AM

We'll follow your lead and take a nap.

ccbatson · October-30-09, 08:36 PM

Anything is preferable to the juvenile insults you spew.

Lorax · October-31-09, 12:18 AM

Try developing a sense of humor and remove the stick up your ass and you may enjoy this exercise rather than responding with dull, pedantic posts and boring the hell out of the rest of us.

ccbatson · October-31-09, 09:23 PM

I have a very healthy sense of humor appropriate for an age above, let's say, 15.....this is far below that level, besides not being the least bit funny.

Lorax · November-01-09, 10:48 AM

Maybe not to you, but others have a good time with it- how could one not laugh at your posts?

Here's how age appropriate your humor is:

http://www.canada-photos.com/data/me...eleton_433.jpg

But then again, that's on your best days, normally your posts are a humor-free zone.