Quote Originally Posted by bailey View Post
The building hasn't had a tenant and has been a ward of the city for 15 years. As has been discussed ad nausem here, there was about zero likelihood that there would be any renovation at any time. The debate is not "park vs. building" it's "park/build-able lot vs. derelict building". how many more decades should it have sat empty before it would be ok to tear it down?
They only would've had to keep it standing until we had someone at the DEGC smart enough to keep track of what year it was.

But the building is gone so it's a moot point.