IMO this refugee security issue has a very simple solution [[At least in regards to reducing the threat of unintentionally accepting clandestine ISIS members). What about increasing the number of refugees we accept, but refusing military age males?
I've watched the footage of the refugees piling into Europe and the vast majority of them appear to be males between 16 and 45. These are exactly the men that need to remain in Syria and fight for their freedom, not flee. It is also the same subset of the population most often responsible for acts of terrorism. By accepting women, children and older males we can both fulfill the moral obligation to assist many that are suffering, but without posing a risk to the U.S population.
Bookmarks