Belanger Park River Rouge
NFL DRAFT THONGS DOWNTOWN DETROIT »



Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 26 to 32 of 32
  1. #26
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,501

    Default

    Editorial by Detnews. Some interesting information. Five years to build, once started.

    http://www.detroitnews.com/story/opinion/editorials/2015/02/24/edit-build-bridge/23958529/

  2. #27

    Default


    Is this a new render?

  3. #28

    Default

    Well, "new" in terms of its being the most recent. But, it's years old. And, really, it's a concept since they still have to actually now hire an engineer/architect. Not knowing that this would go through, every thing we've seen up until now in terms of the actual bridge design has been conceptualizations.

  4. #29

    Default

    it may not be a render, but i'd put money on it being a cable-stay bridge

  5. #30

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rb336 View Post
    it may not be a render, but i'd put money on it being a cable-stay bridge
    I will take that bet. I am going with a suspension bridge. No caissons in the river. To be honest I wouldn't mind at all if you win, cable-stay spanning that river will have some pretty tall towers. This is already more fun than dealing with Mattys commercials.

  6. #31

    Default

    It's almost certain to be a cable-stayed. Very few new suspension bridges are being built in America, because cable-stayed are way cheaper. My aesthetic preferences started off for cable-stayed because it would be new for the state, but then I saw how many other cities were doing it [[and how limited the designs are), and I'm now leaning towards a suspension. Given that Canada has to basically do all of this, now, by itself, I imagine them going with as cheap as they can get it. And, really, if you're not going to do a suspension bridge right, you probably shouldn't do one at all.

  7. #32

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dexlin View Post
    It's almost certain to be a cable-stayed. Very few new suspension bridges are being built in America, because cable-stayed are way cheaper. My aesthetic preferences started off for cable-stayed because it would be new for the state, but then I saw how many other cities were doing it [[and how limited the designs are), and I'm now leaning towards a suspension. Given that Canada has to basically do all of this, now, by itself, I imagine them going with as cheap as they can get it. And, really, if you're not going to do a suspension bridge right, you probably shouldn't do one at all.
    Are not the costs savings of the cable stayed design limited by the length of the span? I thought that as the span increased in length that suspension became more economical. I'm not a bridge expert so I easily could be wrong on this.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Instagram
BEST ONLINE FORUM FOR
DETROIT-BASED DISCUSSION
DetroitYES Awarded BEST OF DETROIT 2015 - Detroit MetroTimes - Best Online Forum for Detroit-based Discussion 2015

ENJOY DETROITYES?


AND HAVE ADS REMOVED DETAILS »





Welcome to DetroitYES! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
DetroitYES! is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to DetroitYES! [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.