Belanger Park River Rouge
NFL DRAFT THONGS DOWNTOWN DETROIT »



Results 1 to 25 of 29

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Willi Guest

    Default

    Campaign reform anyone - take the money out of the equation

  2. #2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Willi View Post
    Campaign reform anyone - take the money out of the equation
    You can't take the money out. And even if you could, it would be an even worse world where the incumbents and 'special interests' would have greater control.

    Please, no, the cure would be worse than the disease.

    Did I say that you really can't take the money out. Nobody can buy ads? Or would ads be reviewed by a government bureaucrat? Give money to candidates that get on the ballot? What about write-ins, like Duggan. No money?

    Nice idea. But would never, ever work. Would only be a deeper trip into the hole of darkness.

    Oh, and did I mention that its unconstitutional? The founding father's had this silly idea that people should be able to speak freely.

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wesley Mouch View Post
    You can't take the money out. And even if you could, it would be an even worse world where the incumbents and 'special interests' would have greater control.

    Please, no, the cure would be worse than the disease.

    Did I say that you really can't take the money out. Nobody can buy ads? Or would ads be reviewed by a government bureaucrat? Give money to candidates that get on the ballot? What about write-ins, like Duggan. No money?

    Nice idea. But would never, ever work. Would only be a deeper trip into the hole of darkness.

    Oh, and did I mention that its unconstitutional? The founding father's had this silly idea that people should be able to speak freely.

    Seriously? "incumbents and special interests would have greater control"? You mean the secretive super-pacs, handing out bags of cash under the darkness of night, have no self-serving interests? I find that a little hard to swallow.

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Honky Tonk View Post
    Seriously? "incumbents and special interests would have greater control"? You mean the secretive super-pacs, handing out bags of cash under the darkness of night, have no self-serving interests? I find that a little hard to swallow.
    Seriously. Yes, seriously.

    We know the SuperPACs have self-serving interests. Shouldn't they? That's their purpose. So if you're in favor of drilling for oil, or limiting Right-to-Work, or expanding Charters -- you get to buy your ad. And you get heard.

    Exactly how does controlling how much money can be spent gets those voices heard? Who gets to decide who has a legitimate interest and who can be heard? Oh, that'll be the legislators. And you think they'll give campaign money to a fringe candidate who might challenge the system?

    Yeah, try that and see just how special interests will control elections.

    Our free-for-all campaign finance world is terrible and the worst system -- except for all the others.

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wesley Mouch View Post
    Seriously. Yes, seriously.

    We know the SuperPACs have self-serving interests. Shouldn't they? That's their purpose. So if you're in favor of drilling for oil, or limiting Right-to-Work, or expanding Charters -- you get to buy your ad. And you get heard.

    Exactly how does controlling how much money can be spent gets those voices heard? Who gets to decide who has a legitimate interest and who can be heard? Oh, that'll be the legislators. And you think they'll give campaign money to a fringe candidate who might challenge the system?

    Yeah, try that and see just how special interests will control elections.

    Our free-for-all campaign finance world is terrible and the worst system -- except for all the others.

    Let me ask you this then. Given my station in life, how do I get my voice heard? Or am I unworthy of having a voice? He with the most toys wins? The special interest pacs already ARE controlling the elections. Those ads aren't cheap.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Honky Tonk View Post
    Let me ask you this then. Given my station in life, how do I get my voice heard? Or am I unworthy of having a voice? He with the most toys wins? The special interest pacs already ARE controlling the elections. Those ads aren't cheap.
    Join.

    Find your voice through your union or trade association. Unions, Realtors, Trial Lawyers, Car Dealers, NRA, Greenpeace. They all spend money advocating for their members. Sure, there are some big fish. But much of the money in these PACs come from aggregation of little contributions from money.

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wesley Mouch View Post
    Join.

    Find your voice through your union or trade association. Unions, Realtors, Trial Lawyers, Car Dealers, NRA, Greenpeace. They all spend money advocating for their members. Sure, there are some big fish. But much of the money in these PACs come from aggregation of little contributions from money.
    What if I join the union but disagree with who they choose to support? Now I'm voting against myself. no thanks.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,501

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Honky Tonk View Post
    Let me ask you this then. Given my station in life, how do I get my voice heard? Or am I unworthy of having a voice? He with the most toys wins? The special interest pacs already ARE controlling the elections. Those ads aren't cheap.
    It has now gotten so that the typical contributor is drowned out.

    If one thousand contributors make contributions totally 10M [[ave. 1K), it just takes one with big bucks to match it through the super packs.

    What's the purpose of the average Joe contributing say 250 bucks to his favorite party?

    The ONLY saving grace is much of these tons of money is wasted. Seeing a dozen commercials a day for a month is like eating pizza twice a day for a month.

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wesley Mouch View Post
    ...The founding father's had this silly idea that people should be able to speak freely.
    I have doubts the they intended for $$$$$$$$ to equal a voice where a handful of million/billionaires can out "speak" the values, and good of, the rest of the citizens

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vic01 View Post
    I have doubts the they intended for $$$$$$$$ to equal a voice where a handful of million/billionaires can out "speak" the values, and good of, the rest of the citizens
    Amen. The whole process has become disgusting. And are the same littering bastards that planted all those signs along the roadway going to come back and remove them?

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Instagram
BEST ONLINE FORUM FOR
DETROIT-BASED DISCUSSION
DetroitYES Awarded BEST OF DETROIT 2015 - Detroit MetroTimes - Best Online Forum for Detroit-based Discussion 2015

ENJOY DETROITYES?


AND HAVE ADS REMOVED DETAILS »





Welcome to DetroitYES! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
DetroitYES! is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to DetroitYES! [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.