Good question but it might not be fair. I recall reading that CVS decided to take a loss on tobacco-sales profits in exchange for the health of their customers.
Suspicious, yes, because corporations rarely if ever deviate from maximizing profits. But let's suspend judgement for a while in case this might be a precedent for corporate responsibility.
That could be a game changer. [[I hope I don't have to eat my words.)
Because the price of these items so exceeds their actual production costs that there's lots of room for price reductions.
While meanwhile up the 401 your immensely-paternal government agency chews on a ban on electronic cigarettes in spite of the fact that they have actually helped many people step down from real cigarettes [[I can say from personal experience).
|
Bookmarks