Yes, D.C. and Detroit are very, very different. No one disputes that and certainly not me, having lived and worked IN Detroit [[been there; done that) and having spent the last 35 years of my life in the D.C. area. I and others I know left MI in the late 70s or 80s.
That said, the principles of urban theory and urban growth [[or decline) is the same.
If not, why would all of the urban pioneers be spending bucks in Midtown? Why would Gilbert be buying what 50+ buildings in downtown?
D.C. is a great place to live, work and play.
Detroit is trying to become that, at least in the downtown areas.
Bookmarks