Quote Originally Posted by aj3647 View Post
What's the justification for saying that the fish is "safe" to eat? Is this based solely on mercury levels?

Also, the "Friends of the Detroit River" survey sounds incredibly unscientific. They surveyed people who already eat Detroit River fish, so already it suffers heavily from selection bias. What about a double-blind randomized taste test?
I agree. The whole article sounds fishy to me.







[[C'mon, you knew that was coming......)