Belanger Park River Rouge
NFL DRAFT THONGS DOWNTOWN DETROIT »



Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 26 to 40 of 40
  1. #26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Novine View Post
    Didn't Orr stop the city's contributions to the pension funds too? If so, that will only exacerbate the shortfall.
    If he 'stopped' the contributions, he was only doing so as part of 'righting the ship'. He knows what's going on the the pension funds. He feels that money is better used by the City to stay afloat and be able to participate in a 'Grand Bargain'.

    Stopping contributions doesn't exacerbate the shortfall. It may actually help the retirees by enabling the 'Grand Bargain'.

    Pouring money towards the funds regardless of the impact on the city might have rather accelerated their collapse.

  2. #27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wesley Mouch View Post
    If he 'stopped' the contributions, he was only doing so as part of 'righting the ship'.
    I'm not even sure that it was Orr's decision. Given that the way they had been funding the pension contributions in the past [[I believe) was to borrow the money to make the necessary deposits, the contributions had to stop once the lending stopped.

    CoD's ability to borrow has been impaired for some time now, and at the time of the Consent Agreement, the city was required to sign it in order for the State to step in and send them some needed to money to make cashflow.

  3. #28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by corktownyuppie View Post
    I could be wrong, as I haven't looked deeply into it, but this is also my wheelhouse so take that for what it's worth.. Generally, "credit rating risk" and "debt portfolio" refers to fixed income and bond investments, not stock investments.
    CTY, Of course you are correct. This is in my wheelhouse too and I mistakenly said stocks when I really meant bonds. Thanks for bringing this to my attention - I have corrected my original post so as not to confuse anyone else. This is important stuff and needs to be explained correctly.

    To be clear, the bond portion of the investment portfolio is generally the safest, most risk adverse part of an overall investment strategy. So when I see that the VAST majority of the bond assets are non-invest grade or not ever rated for risk, then I would be VERY nervous.

    Frankly, I don't even know where any reputable investment fiduciary would be able to find that many Non-Rated bond assets.

  4. #29

    Default

    So quick question: Did the state package of bills require oversight of the pension boards?

    I think this is a key piece of this for both the city/residents and the pensioners, in both cases because if the boards are investing in phony baloney vehicles, then we'll be right back where we found ourselves, since we can't get out from pensions like a VEBA, and the city/residents are still going to be on the hook for any shortfalls, even after the BK is over.

    [[^ How's that for a run-on?)

  5. #30

    Default

    I appreciate everybody's input and comments, thanks everyone. One comment from
    CTY was:

    [[5) the offer from the Grand Bargain to reduce your shortfall to 5% [[and the risk that losing in court means losing a quarter of your pension),

    so when I look over the mailing with the ballot I will look for if the shortfall is somehow
    GUARANTEED to be 5% or less. If the pension system is as dicey as some comments
    make it out to be then maybe in the future there will be a situation where pensions are
    much less than they should be but with no legal recourse since we agreed...but I'm not
    at that point; am still looking at the 2012 GRS report.

  6. #31

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eber Brock Ward View Post
    So quick question: Did the state package of bills require oversight of the pension boards?
    Yes it does.

    http://insurancenewsnet.com/oarticle...l#.U5e-Bie9KSM

    -- HB 5570, sponsored by state Rep. Ken Yonker, R- Caledonia, would tighten restrictions on travel and expenses for the city's pension boards and establish an investment committee that has the authority to recommend or reject pension investments.
    http://voiceofdetroit.net/2014/05/14...in-bankruptcy/

    HB 5570 establishes an investment committee to recommend or reject pension investments

  7. #32

    Default

    Ty. Not that I'm doubting you, but they may have gotten it wrong.

    Looks like SFA analysis says committee recommends, then existing board could approve/reject recommendation. [[Though for disapproval, not sure what plan of adjustment says, which us what the bill references):http://www.legislature.mi.gov/docume...SFA-5570-L.htm

  8. #33

    Default

    I still haven't voted on the Grand Bargain yet [[I know I need to within the next few days).
    Am perusing the Plante and Moran audit at the michigan.gov link that Packman posted
    above.
    This sort of thing is not at all my wheelhouse, and I don't understand parts of the audit
    and parts of the GRS annual report, but aside from the City of Detroit not paying in
    its previous customary fashion, I don't see the GRS floundering at this point in time.
    To wit, in the Plante and Moran audit, there was a shift from AAA to AA for corporate
    securities. Out on the web, it says, "Standard & Poor's lowered its long-term
    sovereign credit rating on the U.S. to AA+ in 2011 - only 4 U.S. nonfinancial companies
    remain AAA: ADP, ExxonMobil, J&J, and Microsoft".

  9. #34

    Default

    It is a little unnerving to see such a large chunk of NR investments as well as
    such a large year over year corporate debt uptick of NR in the Plante & Moran
    audit that Packman posted a link to. However the State of Michigan law limits
    pension investments to fairly safe ones - though there may be a large NR loophole
    in this law that should be corrected - and currently, even if this NR is speculative
    grade, the recent default rate for speculative grade is at a historic relative low
    of 2%, average speculative grade default rate being 4.5%.

  10. #35

    Default

    The Plante & Moran had some details on the pension "back office". The main
    pension bank is Bank of New York. The local bank handling benefits transactions
    is First Independence Bank. The auditors felt that this bank should have a
    nominal monthly balance of zero at one point during a month since the bank
    was simply to handle the inflow and outgo. Instead this bank has typically
    an extra $20 million of pension money on hand at any given time; again this
    is not my arena at all so I can't say whether this is good or not.

  11. #36

    Default

    For a little while the online link to the GRS website wouldn't work for me. So I had
    to locate my $15 glossy hard copy of the report and study that. I mostly trust the
    current board of trustees as listed on page six and I will include Dave Bing as
    trustworthy for pension fiduciary duty although some might not. These are mostly
    current and former city employees and appointees, not investment professionals,
    as noted. However, various segments of the pension funds are managed by investment managers as noted on page 35.
    I think there may be an additional layer of investment advisers to the pension fund as
    well, and then there is state law, and then there is an annual audit.

  12. #37

    Default

    So I am fairly confident about the quality of the GRS investment advisers. However,
    good advisers charge commensurate fees, and one of the considerations when building
    an investment portfolio is that lower fees are more advantageous especially for smaller
    portfolios. This shouldn't be so much of a concern for the GRS since it is a large fund
    but I don't know whether the GRS fees are reasonable.

  13. #38

    Default

    On page 20 there is a list of retirants and beneficiaries tabulated by year
    of retirement. The real old folks have a monthly allowance that is stunningly
    low.
    There is 1 person for retiring in 1950 or before whose monthly allowance is a
    MEASLY $341.
    For the class of 1971-1975, the average monthly allowance is $587.
    I think that inflation in the eighties outpaced the cost of living increases for
    this set of retirees and there has been no subsequent special adjustment.
    In contrast the highest average monthly allowance is for the 2012 retirees - there
    are 406 in this class and it is $2,374.

  14. #39

    Default

    Another highlight.

    "Duty disability rates were found to be higher than previously assumed".

    I will take it that this is partly due to poor working conditions due to the city's poor
    financial condition so in the future rates should go down.

  15. #40

    Default

    Group Averages:

    Age: 48.5 years
    Service: 15.4 years
    Annual Pay: $41,385

    Just mostly us grandmas and grandpas working here at the city.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Instagram
BEST ONLINE FORUM FOR
DETROIT-BASED DISCUSSION
DetroitYES Awarded BEST OF DETROIT 2015 - Detroit MetroTimes - Best Online Forum for Detroit-based Discussion 2015

ENJOY DETROITYES?


AND HAVE ADS REMOVED DETAILS »





Welcome to DetroitYES! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
DetroitYES! is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to DetroitYES! [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.