Belanger Park River Rouge
NFL DRAFT THONGS DOWNTOWN DETROIT »



Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 30

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Default Bike lanes development

    Has anyone notice bike lanes being layed along W. Grand blvd? Nice addition! Other locations in desperate need of bike lanes are Cass Ave, Warren Ave, Mack/MLK Ave, Livernois, 6 & 7 mile and Jefferson Ave.

    Are their any solid plans throughout the city for more bike lanes?

  2. #2

    Default

    There's now a bike lane on Conner south of Harper.

  3. #3

    Default

    yes there are plans for lots of bike lanes all over the city. http://www.detroitmi.gov/Departments...7/Default.aspx

  4. #4

    Default

    lafayette received some new bike lanes a few weeks ago. its nice but i find people ignoring them and treating them like regular traffic lanes...

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by southen View Post
    lafayette received some new bike lanes a few weeks ago. its nice but i find people ignoring them and treating them like regular traffic lanes...
    Lafayette received some new bike lanes a few weeks ago. its nice but I find bikers ignoring them and treating regular traffic lanes like bike lanes.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Honky Tonk View Post
    Lafayette received some new bike lanes a few weeks ago. its nice but I find bikers ignoring them and treating regular traffic lanes like bike lanes.
    LOL, well you're right in some ways. Some car ignore the lanes and drive through and take over the bike lanes, they also park along them which give us no choice but to ride wherever fits. But soon people will notice more of these bike lanes and have to respect it or be ticketed. It's against the law to ride on the sidewalk so something has to be in place for safety reasons.

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gthomas View Post
    LOL, well you're right in some ways. Some car ignore the lanes and drive through and take over the bike lanes, they also park along them which give us no choice but to ride wherever fits. But soon people will notice more of these bike lanes and have to respect it or be ticketed. It's against the law to ride on the sidewalk so something has to be in place for safety reasons.
    Thanx for the info. I actually went to court for a trial when I was ticketed for riding in the street, [[Obstructing Traffic), and, with the help of a competent attorney, won. MI State law gives bikers the same rights as automobiles. That being said, I constantly run into bikers, [[NOT literally), that ignore the bike lanes, or aren't in the far right lane, and feel it's they're God-given right TO obstruct traffic. [[last Saturday's Tour De Troit was a classic example) Sharing the road means cooperation and respect from EVERYONE.

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Honky Tonk View Post
    Thanx for the info. I actually went to court for a trial when I was ticketed for riding in the street, [[Obstructing Traffic), and, with the help of a competent attorney, won. MI State law gives bikers the same rights as automobiles. That being said, I constantly run into bikers, [[NOT literally), that ignore the bike lanes, or aren't in the far right lane, and feel it's they're God-given right TO obstruct traffic. [[last Saturday's Tour De Troit was a classic example) Sharing the road means cooperation and respect from EVERYONE.
    I am always seeing bikers who don't follow road rules. For example they go the wrong way down one-way streets, blow through red lights at relatively busy, but not super busy intersections, or do not yield [[this is the most craziest). Not every biker understands that sharing the road also means following the rules of the road. Yeah lots of drivers don't follow the rules either. I guess a lot of education and enforcement needs to happen in order for this to stop.

    The Bernstien's are taking NYC to court due to bikers creating hazardous conditions in Central Park this week. At first I thought this was a frivolous lawsuit, but since they brought this to the forefront I have been watching bikers more, and as much as I hate to admit it, they have a point.

  9. #9

    Default

    Trumbull just got some bike lanes south of Warren and I think they will be pushing north of Warren as well. No one really realizes they are for bike traffic, but I guess its a start.

  10. #10

    Default

    Trumbull has bike lanes over 94 that were put in over a year ago when they resurfaced that bridge so I'm assuming they are eventually going to call all the way to Milwaukee or the Blvd.

    Hamtramck Dr. around the GM plant has them also now, although that road is terrible for biking. Sooo many potholes.

  11. #11

    Default

    MLK has bikes lanes

  12. #12

    Default

    It seems some in the city will just take these as license to target any cyclists who dare ride outside the lines.

    Just lost a lane of auto traffic on Conner headed north from that road which goes through Chandler Park...and EVERYONE is confused. Mostly because nobody ever bikes there...


    ...but it is unusually sudden, with no warning of the lane closure. If anyone does dare to bike there, I expect trouble.

  13. #13

    Default

    3rd street go bike lanes in both directions since it was made into a two-way street in 2011 from Forest to Temple. 2nd Street was and has been on the same plan with DOT.

  14. #14

    Default

    One of the big problems with bike paths as Rolfsy says is the number of people who do the "Tour de France" amid the easy-going folk. I wouldnt want my 7 year old kid to ride his training-wheels contraption alongside the testosteronis.

  15. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by canuck View Post
    One of the big problems with bike paths as Rolfsy says is the number of people who do the "Tour de France" amid the easy-going folk. I wouldnt want my 7 year old kid to ride his training-wheels contraption alongside the testosteronis.
    I should clarify that I am a walker, and have been playing dodgem with the bike maniacs on the RiverWALK. But regardless of whether one is walking or riding, when these biker gangs [[and they do travel in packs) comes around the corner at top speed from the opposite direction, anybody -- ped, bike or Segway -- is a sitting duck.

  16. #16

    Default

    I noticed that Forest has bike lanes now between Dequindre and Mt. Elliot.

  17. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Honky Tonk View Post
    Thanx for the info. I actually went to court for a trial when I was ticketed for riding in the street, [[Obstructing Traffic), and, with the help of a competent attorney, won. MI State law gives bikers the same rights as automobiles. That being said, I constantly run into bikers, [[NOT literally), that ignore the bike lanes, or aren't in the far right lane, and feel it's they're God-given right TO obstruct traffic. [[last Saturday's Tour De Troit was a classic example) Sharing the road means cooperation and respect from EVERYONE.
    States and cities are revising laws so that bicyclists are not required to use the bike lane if they don't want to. This is because states and cities found themselves liable when a cyclist was hit by a car door or tried to avoid an obstacle. The city of Chicago was sued when a bicyclist ran over a grate in a bike lane and fell. That, because of the law the rider was forced to stay in the lane. The law was quickly revised to allow cyclists to use regular traffic lanes if they chose to, except when a protected cycle track is present. Only city with one in Michigan is Lansing at the moment.

    The law varies state to state and Michigan probably has the best laws for cyclists because they are treated like cars. Some states call bicycles "devices" which means they may have special privileges on roadways. For example, where I live a bicyclist may legally turn left on a red...treating that as a yield. In Michigan that would result as a citation and points on your license. Unfortunately due to the laws, I'm not given much space and have to share the same lane side by side with cars. But Michigan gives cyclists a full lane.

    On a side note, bike lanes should be used on residential streets and cycle tracks should be used on commercial arterials.

    Putting a bike lane on a busy commercial street will result in cyclists opting to use a traffic lane. The reason is bicyclists will consider the bike lane a buffer zone or crash zone in congested areas. On my commute I depart the bike lane and ride in a traffic lane when I pass a block of hotels. 9 out of 10 times patrons will throw open their car doors into the bike lane without looking. [[$1000 offense). As a responsible rider I look first before merging into traffic so no one has to hit the brakes.

    In the case of a cycle track, cars are moved away from the curb. There's a one or two-way lane for bicycles by the curb and a buffer zone so that passengers and drivers can enter and exit their vehicle without obstructing anyone. Collapsable pylons separate motorists from bicycles. Sometimes, there's a raised sidewalk. The intersections will have separate lights for cyclists. Since installation, obedience to traffic signals has hit an all time high. Recent studies also have shown that removing travel lanes for cycle tracks has actually INCREASED traffic flow and throughput in dense urban areas. Who would have thought widening streets for bicycles and reducing them for cars would actually move more drivers down the street faster....and make it safer for cyclists? Fatalities have been reduced to zero on many streets where these have been installed
    Last edited by wolverine; September-25-13 at 07:52 PM.

  18. #18

    Default

    For the folks who say people are driving over the bike lanes as if they're still a regular lane [[and bikers are not using them), to be fair, Detroit is so sprawled out and crime-ridden that it's actually an inconvenience to bike anywhere in many cases, thus in most cases the bike lanes are not being utilized.
    Last edited by 313WX; September-25-13 at 07:53 PM.

  19. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 313WX View Post
    For the folks who say people are driving over the bike lanes as if they're still a regular lane [[and bikers are not using them), to be fair, Detroit is so sprawled out and crime-ridden that it's actually an inconvenience to bike anywhere in many cases, thus in most cases the bike lanes are not being utilized.
    Ideally they'll link higher density areas to downtown. And it's at the very least acknowledgement that there is dedicated space on roadways for cyclists.

  20. #20

    Default

    dont get why they put up no left turn 9-4 signs at w grand and woodward.
    probably going to rack up a LOT of tickets there, its more confusing because they took a lane out to make it a left turn only.

    then the lanes shift and no one knows what lane to be in. got people weaving into my car , just drive straight damnit.

  21. #21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by compn View Post
    dont get why they put up no left turn 9-4 signs at w grand and woodward.
    probably going to rack up a LOT of tickets there, its more confusing because they took a lane out to make it a left turn only.

    then the lanes shift and no one knows what lane to be in. got people weaving into my car , just drive straight damnit.
    I think by far my biggest complaint about driving around Detroit -- and there's plenty to complain about, from bizarre traffic signals to outrageously unaware drivers -- are the "Mad Max" intersections, where three lanes enter, and only two leave. WB Grand Blvd crossing Woodward is a serious contender [[4 in, 3 out, but the same idea). NB Rosa Parks crossing the south service drive of 75 is probably the worst.

  22. #22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gvidas View Post
    I think by far my biggest complaint about driving around Detroit -- and there's plenty to complain about, from bizarre traffic signals to outrageously unaware drivers -- are the "Mad Max" intersections, where three lanes enter, and only two leave. WB Grand Blvd crossing Woodward is a serious contender [[4 in, 3 out, but the same idea). NB Rosa Parks crossing the south service drive of 75 is probably the worst.
    Rosa Parks at Grand is kind of like that. Some intersections in Detroit just do not make any sense and seemed to have been planned out by someone who either didn't care, or was definitely in the wrong field.

  23. #23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gvidas View Post
    I think by far my biggest complaint about driving around Detroit -- and there's plenty to complain about, from bizarre traffic signals to outrageously unaware drivers -- are the "Mad Max" intersections, where three lanes enter, and only two leave. WB Grand Blvd crossing Woodward is a serious contender [[4 in, 3 out, but the same idea). NB Rosa Parks crossing the south service drive of 75 is probably the worst.
    8 Mile and Gratiot was really bad.

    After re-paving the intersection a few years ago, the geniuses overseeing the project failed to put the lanes back within that center median of 8 Mile on Gratiot [[the part where traffic from eastbound 8 Mile would turn and stop to go on northbound Gratiot).

    So every time I would cross 8 Mile going either direction on Gratiot, there would be some fool who was too stupid to follow their lane and cross over into another lane, nearly causing an accident. It doesn't help either that DDOT's service stop is right there by the Dunkin Donuts/Baskin-Robbins, essentially eliminating a lane.

    Same thing would be the case when turning onto Gratiot from 8 Mile. It was an absolute clusterfuck as people would just get in where they fit in when turning instead of actually aligning with a lane.

  24. #24

    Default

    its not any better when they plan it out in advance with signs and paint .

    where woodward goes down to one/two lanes as you get closer to the roundabout.

    if someone in the right or left lane spots that their lane ends, it turns into a drag race to cut in front of you. the 'racetrack' being only 3-4 car lengths long.

    same with g blvd when it goes from divided highway to service drive near rosa parks.
    theres a huge lane of paint, but 90% of drivers in the service drive lane will gun it and cut you off instead of yielding.

    i cant imagine trying to bike around the busy streets in detroit. i'd stick to the sidewalks. lots of open empty streets to bike on though.

  25. #25

    Default

    Kercheval now has bike lanes from St. Jean to East Grand Blvd.
    Name:  Kercheval bike lanes.jpg
Views: 150
Size:  46.1 KB

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Instagram
BEST ONLINE FORUM FOR
DETROIT-BASED DISCUSSION
DetroitYES Awarded BEST OF DETROIT 2015 - Detroit MetroTimes - Best Online Forum for Detroit-based Discussion 2015

ENJOY DETROITYES?


AND HAVE ADS REMOVED DETAILS »





Welcome to DetroitYES! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
DetroitYES! is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to DetroitYES! [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.