This is the second time in the past two days I have seen the phrase "taxation without representation" used incorrectly by angry suburban folk so I'm going to set the record straight.
"Taxation without representation" was the phrase used by the colonists as a protest against their lack of sending a representative to Parliament, despite paying taxes to the crown. They could elect local councils, but had no representative in the supreme legislative house of their country. Last I checked, you can vote for all your legislators, as well as executives as a bonus, so, you are being represented. Your tax dollars at work, homie.
Secondly, the irony with your statement is that not only did you have representation in the DIA millage, you had direct representation. You were the one to cast the vote, not your elected representative [[let alone no one). Then you go and imply that you had no say in the matter. Well, sorry it didn't go the way you liked, that's democracy.
The proposal was also printed on the ballot in approved language. So none of this nonsense about it said something it didn't do. That's frankly not true. If you don't like upcoming millage proposals, fill in the oval next to the NO completely, using black ink. Easy and fun.
And yes, you all have a stake. You all get to visit for free, as the millage stated. Times 4 million people means those 4 million people all get to visit for free as well.
NEXT!
Bookmarks