Belanger Park River Rouge
NFL DRAFT THONGS DOWNTOWN DETROIT »



Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 53
  1. #26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TexasT View Post
    Is 80K a requirement? Because as recently as '04, the Olympic Stadium has held around 70K [[Athens). Ford Field holds 65K and can be expanded.
    If they use Ford Field, they need to remove that dome or make it retractable. Adding more innovating, creative design to the boring form of Ford Field...among other things

  2. #27
    Shollin Guest

    Default

    For one, Ford Field is a dome. Second, it is a football stadium. A track is larger than a football field so you would have to remove seats on the lower bowl to configure it into an olympic stadium. Ford Field would be perfect for non track events like gymnastics and things like that.

  3. #28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by iheartthed View Post
    Note my saying that "they already have one".

    Anyway, there are plenty of arguments against whether Detroit could host the Olympics. Lack of stadium venue is not one of them.
    So what are the issue in hosting the Olympics in Detroit...none right?

  4. #29

    Default

    UM Stadiums field is not big enough for a track.

  5. #30

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by iheartthed View Post
    Anyway, there are plenty of arguments against whether Detroit could host the Olympics. Lack of stadium venue is not one of them.
    Exactly. Most cities just throw up a temporary one anyways. Chicago was going to put one in Grant Park.

    The city needs strong governance before anything like the Olympics can come to town. Detroit and the surrounding areas would just be the venue and you get a lot of help from outside sources, including the USOC, but you need to have a competent local government, which we do not have. The USOC needs to choose a city in two years or so, and I don't think even if we get it right starting from today, and we'd have a positive enough track record for the USOC to feel comfortable putting it in our hands.

    FWIW, not living in Detroit or ever having visited at the time, I remember people considering Detroit's handling of the Super Bowl to be pretty good; I get this and that are apples and oranges. I assume people scoffed at the idea initially as well?

  6. #31
    Shollin Guest

    Default

    Only one city has put up a temporary staidum and that was London last year. It still costs just as much to throw up a temporary statdium as a fixed stadiums

  7. #32

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TexasT View Post
    The city needs strong governance before anything like the Olympics can come to town. Detroit and the surrounding areas would just be the venue and you get a lot of help from outside sources, including the USOC, but you need to have a competent local government, which we do not have. The USOC needs to choose a city in two years or so, and I don't think even if we get it right starting from today, and we'd have a positive enough track record for the USOC to feel comfortable putting it in our hands.

    FWIW, not living in Detroit or ever having visited at the time, I remember people considering Detroit's handling of the Super Bowl to be pretty good; I get this and that are apples and oranges. I assume people scoffed at the idea initially as well?
    Yeah, a city that is on the verge of bankruptcy will probably have a hard time convincing the USOC of its management skills. However, Detroit has about 5 years to right the ship... the 2020 city has to be chosen first.

  8. #33

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shollin View Post
    Only one city has put up a temporary staidum and that was London last year. It still costs just as much to throw up a temporary statdium as a fixed stadiums
    Several cities have thrown up new venues and repurposed them afterwards. And yes, London's was completely temporary, so it's been done [[Chicago planned to build on in Grant Park). Stadium venue really isn't a problem, provided you have the space to build one or something that can be converted. A lot can be done with $2-3B.

  9. #34

    Default

    Well, the city has a whole host of sprinters who could complete. Gotta run pretty fast in town to keep breathing.


    Aside from that, would anybody come? Or would it be the lowest attendance ever recorded?

  10. #35

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Meddle View Post
    Well, the city has a whole host of sprinters who could complete. Gotta run pretty fast in town to keep breathing.


    Aside from that, would anybody come? Or would it be the lowest attendance ever recorded?
    They've already established that you couldn't hold the Track And Field events in Detroit.
    Last edited by Honky Tonk; February-22-13 at 03:25 PM.

  11. #36

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Meddle View Post
    Aside from that, would anybody come? Or would it be the lowest attendance ever recorded?
    Completely my opinion, but I think the Olympics is its own draw and I don't think it being in Detroit would scare people away from attending, assuming Detroit makes the changes that most host cities make [[security, public transit, hiding the poor, cleaning up town albeit artificially).

    Detroit is certainly not as sexy as most other places that have hosted recently [[although perhaps on par with Atlanta, which I'm not sure has much international appeal - at least Detroit is the home of the American car and techno music!). The IOC would market it though. Everyone loves a comeback story - Detroit would be the ultimate one.

    Anyways, it's fun playing Detroit Sim City in my head...now back to the real world.

  12. #37
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    5,067

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TexasT View Post
    Exactly. Most cities just throw up a temporary one anyways. Chicago was going to put one in Grant Park.
    I'm not aware of any temporary Olympic stadia.

    Atlanta was the closest, because they demolished a portion of it, and remade it into Turner Field [[for the Braves), but this is very different from a completely temporary venue.

    London's stadium is supposedly being retrofitted for soccer. Besides that, pretty much all the other recent stadia are just rotting away as white elephants [[London's might too, because they have had problems finding a team willing to take the stadium).

  13. #38

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bham1982 View Post
    I'm not aware of any temporary Olympic stadia.

    Atlanta was the closest, because they demolished a portion of it, and remade it into Turner Field [[for the Braves), but this is very different from a completely temporary venue.

    London's stadium is supposedly being retrofitted for soccer. Besides that, pretty much all the other recent stadia are just rotting away as white elephants [[London's might too, because they have had problems finding a team willing to take the stadium).
    I think the larger point, probably being lost here, is that not having an 80K open air stadium at the time of bidding hasn't kept other cities from successfully hosting the Olympics. There's always a way to work around it. At least one city converted a large college stadium, other ones build new venues that were turned into something else later on or demolished. Chicago planned to build a temporary stadium and tear it down afterwards.

  14. #39

    Default

    Combine it with Windsor to make it the first international city Olympics bid tapping both federal governments. Bring in and dock cruise liners in the straits for use as the Olympic Village and even guest hotel space [Could be a cheap solutions in view the decline the cruise liner industry in the wake of the Carnival Triumph breakdown and Costa Concordia sinking.]

  15. #40

    Default

    Detroit has come closer to being an Olympic host than any other American city that has not hosted the games - including Chicago. Detroit finished second in the voting for the 1964 and 1968 games, and third for 1960.

    However, something tells me that this may not quite be the time for an Olympic bid.

  16. #41

    Default

    The bureaucrats that make up the IOC will not award Detroit an olympic games . I'd love it if they did ! Keep in mind for some reason the free world like to single us out to bash , most likely to take away attention from their own problems . The IOC have taken away baseball , and have thought about taking away women's hockey because Canada and the U.S. have dominated the sport , and have now taken away wrestling [[an original olympic sport) in favor of an '' edge of your seat '' sport of golfing , and have also kept another edge of your seat sport of equestrian [[which is the only olympic sport that uses an animal) and has a fan base of less than a checkers match . Personally I think hosting an olympic games is too costly

  17. #42

    Default

    I thought Detroiters have had enough with corruption and now you want to invite the IOC to town?

  18. #43

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 401don View Post
    I thought Detroiters have had enough with corruption and now you want to invite the IOC to town?

    I was on the edge of my seat for a while, to say what you said 401don. I wouldnt wish an Olympics on Detroit on top of everything else it needs to address. What a costly free-for-all these olympics are. The only way Detroit can "get" games is by having a concerted regional push to fix the city and amalgate. Even then, I wouldnt wish it on Detroit.

  19. #44

    Default

    Detroit will NEVER get the olympic games in 2084!

  20. #45

    Default

    As my user name implies, I was born in 1936. What happens in 2024 is of absolutely no concern to me.

  21. #46

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ray1936 View Post
    As my user name implies, I was born in 1936. What happens in 2024 is of absolutely no concern to me.
    Nonsense. 88 is the new 75!

  22. #47

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lowell View Post
    Combine it with Windsor to make it the first international city Olympics bid tapping both federal governments. Bring in and dock cruise liners in the straits for use as the Olympic Village and even guest hotel space [Could be a cheap solutions in view the decline the cruise liner industry in the wake of the Carnival Triumph breakdown and Costa Concordia sinking.]
    This is easy, and Lowell has given it an awesome start. It would be easy to put in event trains between Detroit [[where some events would be held), Windsor [[ditto) and Ann Arbor [[natch). Detroit has always done a good job with major events. Look at the NCAA tourney and the Super Bowl [[am I allowed to say that?).

    All of the bummer type problems so many have mentioned are easily fixed, and certainly the state and province, as well as private sector benefactors [[Gilbert, Penske, local foundations, the usual crowd) would help.

    Think positive kids, this is not a pipe dream.

  23. #48

    Default

    It's really gonna smart when we get beat out by Mexico City again.

  24. #49
    Shollin Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TexasT View Post
    I think the larger point, probably being lost here, is that not having an 80K open air stadium at the time of bidding hasn't kept other cities from successfully hosting the Olympics. There's always a way to work around it. At least one city converted a large college stadium, other ones build new venues that were turned into something else later on or demolished. Chicago planned to build a temporary stadium and tear it down afterwards.
    What is being lost is the cities that did not have a stadium had the means to build one. Chicago wasn't the first choice to host for the US. San Francisco was the first choice but they're failure to secure a stadium deal made the USOC turn to Chicago. The stadium Chicago designed was not going to be completely demolished. It was going to be shrunk down to a 7500 seat stadium. Los Angeles did not convert a college stadium. The coliseum was originally built to host the olympics. It was converted into a college stadium.
    Last edited by Shollin; February-24-13 at 06:16 PM.

  25. #50
    Shollin Guest

    Default

    Also, why the hell would Canada jump into this with Windsor? Toronto is perfectly capable of hosting and a much better option than some Detroit-Windsor abomination. Toronto has been making a bid but has been coming up short.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Instagram
BEST ONLINE FORUM FOR
DETROIT-BASED DISCUSSION
DetroitYES Awarded BEST OF DETROIT 2015 - Detroit MetroTimes - Best Online Forum for Detroit-based Discussion 2015

ENJOY DETROITYES?


AND HAVE ADS REMOVED DETAILS »





Welcome to DetroitYES! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
DetroitYES! is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to DetroitYES! [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.