Belanger Park River Rouge
NFL DRAFT THONGS DOWNTOWN DETROIT »



Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 37

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Default Electoral College next in the crosshairs?


  2. #2

    Default

    I think we should get rid of the Electoral College in all states. Presidents be picked by country-wide popular vote.

    Does anyone see any negatives in that?

  3. #3

    Default

    I called this a couple days ago in another thread. Can't win elections fair and square? Too chickenshit to stand up the psychopaths, misogynists, and racists that make up what's left of your party? Manipulate the system till you win!

    Hell, why not just abolish the Constitution and declare martial law? Whatever it takes, right?

    I'm not impressed. They still lost the popular vote pretty handily. This blatant politicking isn't going to get them any fans. Plutocracy, racism, and religious fanaticism only have so many proponents.

  4. #4
    JVB Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 48091 View Post
    I think we should get rid of the Electoral College in all states. Presidents be picked by country-wide popular vote.

    Does anyone see any negatives in that?
    There are several issues with that approach. Population centers are heavily concentrated in a handful of states, leaving the vast majority of the country underrepresented in a popular vote. That may not seem like a problem to you if you live in one of those population centers, but you would view it differently if you didn't. In order to keep a cohesive federal system, all states need to feel like they have a say in the process or they will have no reason to remain part of that federal system.

    I know it's popular on this board to call all conservatives racists, but that's not any more correct than calling all black people criminals, or all liberals homosexual, or any other vast number of stupid generalities I see posted on here and other places.

    So a large part of this country is conservative and has different values than those in urban centers, but their beliefs need to be given weight or we could have another Civil War on our hands. I'm not speaking with hyperbole either, I could easily see a number of conservative states presenting quite a problem for the federal government if their populace feels that their states rights are being ignored.

    Also remember that this country is not a Democracy - it is a Republic. A Republic means that each state is allowed to control its own laws for the most part, and that the federal government is only permitted to infringe on that in certain cases that violate federal law as called out by the Constitution. The Constitution is a contract between the federal government and the states, and if that contract is broken by either side then the contract is invalid.

    Majority rule [[Democracy) can be a dangerous thing. Minorities should understand that better than anyone. There have to be provisions in law that protect minority viewpoints, and the electoral college is the system that was developed to protect states with a minority of the population.

    Finally, the President is NOT your representative. Over the years we have begun to treat the office of the president as if he were King and that he represents us, but that's not what the office was meant for. The President is simply the head the Executive branch of Government and Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces. Our actual representatives are in Congress - they are the ones that represent out interests, not the President. That's not his job. His job is to run the administrative business of the country and defend the country, not to represent the people of the country. We already have a branch of government that does that.
    Last edited by JVB; December-18-12 at 01:15 PM. Reason: misspellings and shitty grammar

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JVB View Post
    There are several issues with that approach. Population centers are heavily concentrated in a handful of states, leaving the vast majority of the country underrepresented in a popular vote. That may not seem like a problem to you if you live in one of those population centers, but you would view it differently if you didn't. In order to keep a cohesive federal system, all states need to feel like they have a say in the process or they will have no reason to remain part of that system.
    As opposed to the system now where the whole election is decided by a handful of swing states? In this past election, your presidential vote was basically irrelevant unless you lived in Ohio, Florida, Virginia, or Colorado. There's a pretty big chunk of the country being "underrepresented" in this system too, no?

  6. #6
    JVB Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by antongast View Post
    As opposed to the system now where the whole election is decided by a handful of swing states? In this past election, your presidential vote was basically irrelevant unless you lived in Ohio, Florida, Virginia, or Colorado. There's a pretty big chunk of the country being "underrepresented" in this system too, no?
    Without the electoral college we wouldn't even have swing states, we would have swing cities. The electoral system isn't perfect, but it at least attempts to make the views of the most amount of people as relevant as possible, without being too unfair to the views of the majority.

    Besides, like I said the President is not your representative. That's not his job.

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JVB View Post
    Without the electoral college we wouldn't even have swing states, we would have swing cities.
    No, we would have cities that vote Democratic and rural areas that vote Republican, just like we do now. In the electoral college system, the redness or blueness of most states is basically determined by whether they get more votes in cities or rural areas. Illinois is a blue state because it has Chicago in it. Indiana is a red state because it doesn't have Chicago in it. Ohio is a swing state because the rural Republican areas roughly balance out the urban Democratic areas.

    If we abolished the electoral college, Republicans would win by appealing to rural voters nationwide, and Democrats would win by appealing to urban voters nationwide, and both parties would try to peel off as many moderate suburban voters as possible. Right now, Republicans in upstate New York or inland California and Democrats in Austin or St. Louis are completely ignored by presidential campaigns, because their home regions happen to be included in states whose mix of voters is tilted strongly against them, and elections get decided by idiosyncratic local issues in states that happen to have swingable mixes of voters.
    Last edited by antongast; December-18-12 at 01:37 PM.

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JVB View Post
    ...
    Also remember that this country is not a Democracy - it is a Republic. ...
    Fine post. Minority rights are important. The rush to popular vote for President needs to be very carefully thought through. I see flaws in the EC, but it does work to limit popular mood swings. In this, it is a better tool than campaign finance reform. It keeps more power in the political machine... and thus encourages the machine to respond to voters.

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JVB View Post
    There are several issues with that approach. Population centers are heavily concentrated in a handful of states, leaving the vast majority of the country underrepresented in a popular vote. That may not seem like a problem to you if you live in one of those population centers, but you would view it differently if you didn't. In order to keep a cohesive federal system, all states need to feel like they have a say in the process or they will have no reason to remain part of that federal system.

    I know it's popular on this board to call all conservatives racists, but that's not any more correct than calling all black people criminals, or all liberals homosexual, or any other vast number of stupid generalities I see posted on here and other places.

    So a large part of this country is conservative and has different values than those in urban centers, but their beliefs need to be given weight or we could have another Civil War on our hands. I'm not speaking with hyperbole either, I could easily see a number of conservative states presenting quite a problem for the federal government if their populace feels that their states rights are being ignored.

    Also remember that this country is not a Democracy - it is a Republic. A Republic means that each state is allowed to control its own laws for the most part, and that the federal government is only permitted to infringe on that in certain cases that violate federal law as called out by the Constitution. The Constitution is a contract between the federal government and the states, and if that contract is broken by either side then the contract is invalid.

    Majority rule [[Democracy) can be a dangerous thing. Minorities should understand that better than anyone. There have to be provisions in law that protect minority viewpoints, and the electoral college is the system that was developed to protect states with a minority of the population.

    Finally, the President is NOT your representative. Over the years we have begun to treat the office of the president as if he were King and that he represents us, but that's not what the office was meant for. The President is simply the head the Executive branch of Government and Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces. Our actual representatives are in Congress - they are the ones that represent out interests, not the President. That's not his job. His job is to run the administrative business of the country and defend the country, not to represent the people of the country. We already have a branch of government that does that.

    Not only is it popular, but its been my experience that its true. EVERY CONSERVATIVE I have known or know does display rascist behavior to some degree. There is a reason why the GOP is so popular with those sorts.

    And your comments about abother civil war are just hyperbole. Its only conservatives who piss and moan about leaving the Union when things dont go there way - please please please let them try.

  10. #10
    JVB Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by leapfrog View Post
    Not only is it popular, but its been my experience that its true. EVERY CONSERVATIVE I have known or know does display rascist behavior to some degree. There is a reason why the GOP is so popular with those sorts.
    I'm not sure where to start with such an idiotic comment. Maybe you should start by researching some notable black conservatives then tell us all how racist they are. Based on your comment, I'll assume you're not bright enough to do the research yourself so here's a few to get you started:
    Politicians



    United States judges



    Talk show hosts



    [[to be cont...)

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,040

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 48091 View Post
    I think we should get rid of the Electoral College in all states. Presidents be picked by country-wide popular vote.
    I agree 100%. If the people are supposed to elect our leaders, they should eliminate this Electoral College garbage.
    Last edited by Papasito; December-19-12 at 01:31 PM.

  12. #12

    Default

    "With the frustration of the current system—and the fact that almost everyone would agree proportional or CD is more representative and maybe more fair than the current winner-take-all—Republicans have a strong, righteous argument," Anuzis said. "However, the motivation would be viewed as being purely political since it hasn’t been done before."
    No, "the motivation would be viewed as being purely political" because you're only doing it in blue states. There are plenty of Democratic voters in, say, Atlanta or New Orleans or the Mississippi Delta who would probably like their presidential votes to count too. If this system is fairer than winner-take-all, why not implement it nationwide?

  13. #13

    Default

    Can someone move this to non-Detroit?

  14. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DetroitPlanner View Post
    Can someone move this to non-Detroit?
    A topic about a measure specifically designed to lessen Detroit's voting power?

  15. #15

    Default

    We need to remember that this EC works both ways. People were upset and wanted to do away [[Dems mostly) with the EC when Gore lost and he actually won the popular vote so unlike Mitt he actually had a beef. Look the Obama people ran a brilliant campaign. They targeted the swing states down to the county. The Repubs are looking for quick fix solutions so they don't have to address systemic problems within their party and platform.

  16. #16
    JVB Guest

    Default

    Columnists



    Athletes and entertainers





    Others










    As offensive [[and obviously wrong) as it is to call all conservatives racist, I guess its OK for me to now retort by calling all liberals retarded. Well, not all liberals, but any liberals that agree with your offensive statement are obviously retarded.

    Once you get done calling all of the notable black conservatives I posted above "Uncle Tom's", head on over to the National Black Republicans site and educate yourself about them. Not all Republicans are conservative of course, but you get the idea. You're an idiot.

  17. #17

    Default

    I see the Snyder is back on his false neutrality platform again.

    The sheeps clothes are off homie. The people of this state already see you for what you are, please stop playing humble nice guy moderate role.

    Fucking ..........

  18. #18

    Default

    JVB - the mere fact that you can essentially list "prominent black republicans" in a short space does more to support the argument than dispel it, especially when you include so many that are based on off-hand comments

  19. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JVB View Post
    As offensive [[and obviously wrong) as it is to call all conservatives racist, I guess its OK for me to now retort by calling all liberals retarded. Well, not all liberals, but any liberals that agree with your offensive statement are obviously retarded.
    Interesting that you'd be equally offended by a literal characterization and a pejorative slur.

  20. #20

    Default

    Republicans are looking for any angle they can to try to sit back in the big chair. It's disgusting.

  21. #21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cincinnati_Kid View Post
    Republicans are looking for any angle they can to try to sit back in the big chair. It's disgusting.
    How do you figure? Obama won the popular vote both elections. If I recall, when Bush won, that is when the outcry came to get rid of the electoral college.

    If you want to know whats disgusting, just take a look at the lying f@ck that is president now. He's for the middle class! LIAR! Hes done squat for me or anyone else that is middle class. Hell, he even took money out of my paycheck this year. For me, its about $130 a month. My wife and child couldn't use that money, he decided that he has a better use for it.

  22. #22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jerrytimes View Post
    How do you figure? Obama won the popular vote both elections. If I recall, when Bush won, that is when the outcry came to get rid of the electoral college.

    If you want to know whats disgusting, just take a look at the lying f@ck that is president now. He's for the middle class! LIAR! Hes done squat for me or anyone else that is middle class. Hell, he even took money out of my paycheck this year. For me, its about $130 a month. My wife and child couldn't use that money, he decided that he has a better use for it.
    For the record, I'm middle class and I'm way better off under this President than the previous. I'm not a fan of him in any way, but I'd like to counter the hysterics from partisans.

  23. #23

    Default

    I voted for Obama in the 2012 election, but I have to admit that Michigan's current system of allocating all of our votes to one candidate is inherently unfair. If Mitt Romney had won Michigan by just 10 votes and Michigan had given all 16 of her Electoral College votes to Romney many here would have been screaming bloody murder.

    That being said, I think this is a dirty strategic play by Republicans in Lansing and it's not right to change the rules in the middle of the game. The current system favors Democratic candidates, but 20 years from now the same system may very well benefit Republicans. Even though it's not a totally fair system I say it should stay as it is.

  24. #24

    Default

    Nebraska and Maine have awarded electors' votes like this for years. If I remember correctly, electors for the House districts are awarded based on how each House district voted and the two electors for Senators are awarded based on the state wide popular vote.

  25. #25

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Instagram
BEST ONLINE FORUM FOR
DETROIT-BASED DISCUSSION
DetroitYES Awarded BEST OF DETROIT 2015 - Detroit MetroTimes - Best Online Forum for Detroit-based Discussion 2015

ENJOY DETROITYES?


AND HAVE ADS REMOVED DETAILS »





Welcome to DetroitYES! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
DetroitYES! is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to DetroitYES! [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.