Fascist neo-Nazi, right wing nut job, commie, terrorist, fundamentalist, whackos

[oladub]

Sorry, didn't see any "brownshirt" incident.

When it comes to the security of the president, there are no civil liberties, sorry.

He was out of the cordon, fine, we all know that. If he was within it, he would have had his weapon confiscated and been detained.

Funny how a priest gives him permission to have a gun on church ground- shows you how lost religion really is in this country, and how politics of personal destruction is now engaged in by the so-called Christian churches.

You must have missed the post. here it is again. Note the Obama thug acting like a fascist in his [[literally) brown shirt trying to provoke the guy with the gun. He should be hard to miss.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUxjahek0f8

Sure, if he was in it, he would have been removed. But he wasn't. End of story. Its in your utopia where there are no civil liberties.

The State of New Hampshire allows open carry. The priest gave permission for a law abiding citizen to stand on the lawn. Big deal. Priests have been known to give sanctuary to lawbreakers too. How does that fit into your theory? After seeing the video, do you still think the priest is more evil than the Obama thug? Was the priest or the thug more 'involved in the politics of personal destruction'?

[ccbatson]

I must agree with the opposition here...guns have no place anywhere near the location of our President [[much as I disagree with him, and as much as he despises this country).

[Lorax]

No one despises American more than the Reich, which would include the dynamic duo of Oldschlub and Batmaster.

Given that fact, I guess hiding behind a priest's frock is typical for those who support aiding and abetting criminals.

Don't start me on the Catholic church's hiding pedophiles behind the 'cloak of secrecy' which is the organized church of today. This is no excuse for breaking the law, and clergy are not above it, or immune to it.

I could care less what New Hampshire feels about open-carry laws. It's a security issue, period. Those rights are recinded when the proximity to the president is the issue.

[oladub]

No one despises American more than the Reich, which would include the dynamic duo of Oldschlub and Batmaster.

Given that fact, I guess hiding behind a priest's frock is typical for those who support aiding and abetting criminals.

Don't start me on the Catholic church's hiding pedophiles behind the 'cloak of secrecy' which is the organized church of today. This is no excuse for breaking the law, and clergy are not above it, or immune to it.

I could care less what New Hampshire feels about open-carry laws. It's a security issue, period. Those rights are recinded when the proximity to the president is the issue.

The Secret Service had already set up a security perimeter to assure the safety of the President. This guy was not in it. The priest was not a Catholic priest. Bad guess. You don't seem to care about about the rule of law in general. Your expressed frothing hatred and intolerance of Republicans, southern whites, fiscal conservatives, religious folks, and others seems to have you imagining things and expressing inner reich fantasies of despotic socialist rule.

Still no comments on the Obama brownshirt trying to provoke the gun owner? Doesn't his action jive with your narrative?
more Obama thugs - this time beating up a black conservative
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yBdbTVUeay8

I realize that the overwhelming majority of Democrats are decent law observing citizens. Some even vote for peace candidates like Kucinich. But, hey, as much as you like to portray the other side as fascists, neither party has a lock on the title as evidenced in these two videos.

~
"If you get hit, we will punch back twice as hard"
-White House Deputy Chief of Staff Jim Messina 8/5/09
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0809/25891.html

[ccbatson]

He/they may not have been in the perimeter, but the intent is clear and inappropriate. That is not an effective way to oppose Obama, if anything, it strengthens the liberal arguments.