That is a good point to add. My issue however [[beyond the mismanagement by the city and the worthlessness of the Program Manager brought in) is that it is represented as if the state if just writing a check to keep the city afloat.
Granted papers thrive on outrage but they need to clarify that the state is withholding the city's bond money [[that the city is on the hook for), not just cutting a bail out check to the city. Accuracy in reporting on such a simple but critical differentiation should be expected.
Bookmarks