I thought I explained it? There is less chance of having any power or equality for wives in a plural marriage. There is a reason it died out. Not practical or easily workable. Where is the demand for plural marriage? I haven't seen it except among certain religious cults in this country.Don't mean to be confrontational, but I've found in conversations with feminists, that plural marriage is a deal breaker, but gay marriage is not. I've also found that being sensitive to the various sexual orientations seems to come to a halt when plural marriage is introduced to the discussion. I don't know why that is, why being liberal is demanded on one hand but squashed on the other.
Extending the same rights straight couples have to gay couples is simple fairness. I don't think it takes much "liberalism" at all to grasp that.
Bookmarks