Members of a House Committee are NOT public servants--they are elected political figures.I find it best to ignore sensationalist sentences such as the bolded above. The blame game is not serving us well. The public servants on this committee I trust are doing their best to represent the public, and balance competing needs in economically difficult times.
BUREAUCRATS--the professionals with technical know-how, analytical skills, and an agenda of objectivity--are public servants.
Hardy har har. We get it--you hate gubmint "just because". So you'll denigrate the thousands of:
lawyers
geologists
engineers
accountants
doctors
technicians
archeologists
scientists
historians
park rangers
meteorologists
and others who serve YOU
as incompentent simply because you have a political axe to grind.
How hilarious.
Unfortunately, the ratio of competence to deadwood is pretty low. I was a supervisory engineer [[GM-15) working for the federal government and the number of zombies I had to surmount to get anything done was appalling. There are too many high graded people that are high graded because of bureaucratic infighting skills rather than technical or professional competence.Hardy har har. We get it--you hate gubmint "just because". So you'll denigrate the thousands of:
lawyers
geologists
engineers
accountants
doctors
technicians
archeologists
scientists
historians
park rangers
meteorologists
and others who serve YOU
as incompentent simply because you have a political axe to grind.
How hilarious.
So how is that different from any private-sector outfit?Unfortunately, the ratio of competence to deadwood is pretty low. I was a supervisory engineer [[GM-15) working for the federal government and the number of zombies I had to surmount to get anything done was appalling. There are too many high graded people that are high graded because of bureaucratic infighting skills rather than technical or professional competence.
|
Bookmarks