I think some people are looking back on Tiger Stadium's design with some slightly rose-colored glasses. People are absolutely correct that the majority of the upper deck seats at TS were the BEST seats in baseball bar none. However, in order to get those seats, there were thousands of the WORST seats in baseball in the lower deck.
I sat in the upper deck for every game except one at Tiger Stadium. My last game was in Sept of 99 when seats were very hard to come by as everyone wanted one last trip to the ballpark before it closed. Our seats were in the lower deck WAY back. It was great to have one last trip there, but from a fan viewing perspective, it was very disappointing.
If the ball got more than ten feet in the air, I couldn't see it and I had to follow the movement of the players to track the play. It was dark, it was dank. I had a brand new ball cap ruined by a greasy liquid of some sort dripping down from the upper deck. Not exactly a positive fan experience.
The difference between CP and TS are this. TS was designed so either you had the best seats or the worst seats with little in between. CP, with its open design and sight lines offers very few of the best seats, very few worst seats, and a lot of good to OK seats.
I like both parks. I think there were many great things about Tiger Stadium and I think there are many great things about Comerica Park. And for the people saying you need binoculars at Comerica Park, I suggest you schedule a visit to your optometrist rather than the ball park. I've sat in the very last row of CP and, while not the best seats, I saw everything just fine.
Bookmarks