Using that logic, isn't that a pretty good reason that he should have paid for his car? Just playing devil's advocate, Detroit.
Was the car promised to him as part of his compensation package?
Even so, I can see where this sends the wrong message to the public. Besides, as a retired GM executive, he should be able to get a pretty good deal on an SUV on his own.
Kind of bad form.
That 'option' does seem to emerge doesn't it?
Originally Posted by Detroitej...as a retired GM executive, he should be able to get a pretty good deal on an SUV on his own.
|
Bookmarks