To me, Mickelson comes across as kind of disingenuous. It's common knowledge that he is a big gambler. Not that it makes any difference, he can well afford the losses. It's just belies that aw shucks, gee wizz persona he tries to project.
That still doesn't justify why the writer needed to bring up something from the distant past. It was disingenuous. I don't blame him for not wanting to come back.
Welcome to DetroitYES! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
DetroitYES! is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit. Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to DetroitYES! [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
Bookmarks