Quote Originally Posted by softailrider View Post
To me, Mickelson comes across as kind of disingenuous. It's common knowledge that he is a big gambler. Not that it makes any difference, he can well afford the losses. It's just belies that aw shucks, gee wizz persona he tries to project.
That still doesn't justify why the writer needed to bring up something from the distant past. It was disingenuous. I don't blame him for not wanting to come back.