Belanger Park River Rouge
ON THIS DATE IN DETROIT HISTORY - BELANGER PARK »



Page 1 of 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 256

Thread: 713,000

  1. #1

    Default 713,000

    That's the official number, according to Channel 7.
    Last edited by BrushStart; March-22-11 at 11:09 AM.

  2. #2

    Default

    Nasty, so now we're the 17th largest city in the country and the 4th largest city in the midwest.

  3. #3

    Default

    Pitiful. Absolutely pitiful. Down from just under 2m in fifty years.

  4. #4

    Default

    That's astounding.

  5. #5
    Vox Guest

    Default

    I was pretty close, only off by 9000 or so. On the other thread, that is.

  6. #6

    Default

    I await the other numbers for the metro, as they'll have much more important information. We knew this number was going to be psychologically important. Let's get down to the real nitty-gritty and soon.

  7. #7
    Vox Guest

    Default

    Why wait? Oakland county 2000 census 1,194,156 in 2010 1,202,362. Macomb County 2000 census 788,149 in 2010 840,978. Wayne County 2000 census 2,061,161 in 2010, 1,820,584

  8. #8

  9. #9
    bartock Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vox View Post
    Why wait? Oakland county 2000 census 1,194,156 in 2010 1,202,362. Macomb County 2000 census 788,149 in 2010 840,978. Wayne County 2000 census 2,061,161 in 2010, 1,820,584
    So, it appears that roughly 80% of Wayne County's loss between 2000-2010 was Detroit population loss. Not sure how that will be taken, but it may be good for inner-ring burbs and the prospects of redeveloping the core.


    I believe the official Metro Detroit includes St. Clair, Lapeer and Livingston Counties. Totalled up, 4,296,250 by 2010 census figures.

  10. #10

    Default

    The kicker here is the increase in Macomb and Oakland Coutny is directly correlated with the decline in Wayne County [[Detroit). The region didn't actually grow, in fact the tri-country decreased by 140k. So yeah, and the beat goes on...

  11. #11

    Default

    So, despite modest gains for Oakland and Macomb counties, the region as a whole has shrunk. Yes?

  12. #12

    Default

    This is preposterous. I hope they challenge that figure. I feel that is extremely low.

  13. #13

    Default

    And if this is all true about the Metro's numbers, that means we're going to fall from the 11th largest metro area in the country to the 14th largest [[behind Phoenix and San Francisco).

  14. #14
    bartock Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Detroitnerd View Post
    So, despite modest gains for Oakland and Macomb counties, the region as a whole has shrunk. Yes?
    Region's population has shrunk, demographics in a lot of places have changed and are changing.

  15. #15
    Vox Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rbdetsport View Post
    This is preposterous. I hope they challenge that figure. I feel that is extremely low.
    Spot on, in my opinion. Consider the whole picture, not just Midtown and some neighborhoods that have people in them. I guess that if there is an undercount, I would blame the citizens of Detroit for not being cooperative with the census takers.

  16. #16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 313WX View Post
    And if this is all true about the Metro's numbers, that means we're going to fall from the 11th largest metro area in the country to the 14th largest [[behind Phoenix and San Francisco).
    Probably 15th... Behind the Inland Empire, California.

  17. #17

    Default

    So even despite the sharp decline, in hindsight this is a good thing for Detroit for the fact that the suburbs can't claim they're doing just fine without the city when they're declining as a whole also.

  18. #18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 313WX View Post
    So even despite the sharp decline, in hindsight this is a good thing for Detroit for the fact that the suburbs can't claim they're doing just fine without the city when they're declining as a whole also.
    I don't think that's something worth gloating about. But clearly this should change the course of the discussion. This isn't just a Detroit problem.

  19. #19

    Default

    Way lower than I expected

  20. #20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rbdetsport View Post
    This is preposterous. I hope they challenge that figure. I feel that is extremely low.
    I don't know, there are a lot of areas that were much fuller in 2000 than they are today. And look at how many former Detroiters now reside in Harper Woods, Eastpointe, Warren, Hazel Park, Madison heights, Ferndale, Oak Park, Southfield, Farmington Hills, West Bloomfield, Canton, etc. There has been a massive outflow that's been confirmed by property managers I've spoken to.

  21. #21
    bartock Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by iheartthed View Post
    I don't think that's something worth gloating about. But clearly this should change the course of the discussion. This isn't just a Detroit problem.
    See, now you just went and blew my statement about disagreeing with you out of the water. Agree 100%.

  22. #22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bartock View Post
    See, now you just went and blew my statement about disagreeing with you out of the water. Agree 100%.
    Well, if it's any consolation, this has pretty much been my position all along. I just happen to think that Detroit is more essential to righting the regional trajectory than any individual suburb [[or suburban county). That's why my positions tend to be Detroit-centric...

  23. #23

    Default

    The inner and middle ring suburban numbers will be interesting. In 2000 all suburbs touching Detroit and the entire Woodward corridor of towns running to Pontiac lost population with the exception of Southfield [a small gain due to middle-class Afro-Am emigration] and Dearborn which grew 10% due to Arab-Am immigration. The inurb of Hamtramck also grew.

    The middle rings were flat in 2000 and IMO there numbers will be most telling for our whole community.

    Even more important for all will be the economic data. We already know about Sterling Heights having the steepest decline in per capita income, over $20K per year. These trends need to be examined. Decline in population combined with increase in income [This happened in downtown] is different from decline in both or increase in population and decline in income.

  24. #24
    Buy American Guest

    Default

    Here's the bottom line:

    "The losses that we have are completely – or primarily – linked to the decline in the auto industry and in manufacturing in general,” said Professor Lyke Thompson, director of The Center for Urban Studies at Wayne State."

    What did anyone expect?

    WHAT YOU DRIVE, DRIVES AMERICA.
    OUT OF A JOB YET? KEEP BUYING FOREIGN.

  25. #25

    Default

    “This speaks volumes and is very disappointing,” said Oakland County Executive L. Brooks Patterson, who was born and grew up in Detroit. “We’re seeing what happens when there’s a total collapse of city services. Detroit is in desperate straits.”
    Oakland County gained a little less than 15,000 in population and stands at 1,202,362, according to the Census figures.
    “We probably would have had a higher population number, but we have an unemployment rate of 15%. We took a huge drubbing with the automotiveindustry collapse,” Patterson said. “A lot of those guys and gals left the state, so the fact that we only gained 15,000 … I think we did alright, given what we’re up against.”
    Ohh Brooksie, you dumb motherflukker.

Page 1 of 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Instagram
BEST ONLINE FORUM FOR
DETROIT-BASED DISCUSSION
DetroitYES Awarded BEST OF DETROIT 2015 - Detroit MetroTimes - Best Online Forum for Detroit-based Discussion 2015

ENJOY DETROITYES?


AND HAVE ADS REMOVED DETAILS »





Welcome to DetroitYES! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
DetroitYES! is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to DetroitYES! [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.