Belanger Park River Rouge
ON THIS DATE IN DETROIT HISTORY - DOWNTOWN PONTIAC »



Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1

    Default U.S. co. involved in Egypt's communication shutdown

    from Save the Internet.com:

    Egypt's Mubarak regime today shut down Internet and cell phone communications before launching a violent crackdown against protesters.
    Free Press has just discovered that one American company — Boeing-owned Narus of Sunnyvale, Calif. — has sold Egypt "Deep Packet Inspection" [[DPI) equipment that can be used by the regime to track, target and crush political dissent over the Internet and mobile phones.1
    Egyptian security forces have already arrested leading opposition figures for speaking out online. At such a crucial moment of democratic upheaval, it’s shocking that an American company would help Egypt repress its people.
    Since the 2009 crackdown in Iran, Free Press has raised the alarm over the abuse of this technology. Today, we’re calling on Congress to investigate global trafficking in DPI technology by American firms.


    Lawmakers of both parties seem to agree that democracy everywhere is at risk when you let repressive regimes block open networks.


    "Internet Censorship is a real challenge, and not one any particular industry — much less any single company — can tackle on its own," California Rep. Mary Bono Mack wrote in 2009. "Efforts to promote freedom of expression and to limit the impact of censorship require both private and public sector engagement."


    Yesterday, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton urged Egypt's government "not to prevent peaceful protests or block communications, including on social media."
    The power to control the Internet and the resulting harm to democracy are so disturbing that the threshold for using DPI must be set very high. That’s why, before DPI becomes more widely used around the world and at home, the U.S. government must establish clear and legitimate criteria for governing the use of such surveillance and control technologies.

  2. #2

    Default

    Is this a different Hillary Clinton than the one that threatened networks that don't actively assist the government in shutting down Wikileaks? Good for the US government to use as their powerful feel fit, but bad for other governments to use as their powerful feel fit?

    Techies, or hackers, as our corporate-political elite label them, will soon enough find a way around this tactic's use in the future. The Feds will be lucky to get a useless bill out of committee before then. Keep government out of this. They are the ones that created this oppressive technology. Once again, more federal government is the problem, not the solution.

  3. #3

    Default

    LOL! Yes. Just imagine the damage a government agency like DARPA would do if they became involved in all of our gloriously incompatible networks. They'd probably invent something like an internet to prevent us from even discussing this topic.

    Oops.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Instagram
BEST ONLINE FORUM FOR
DETROIT-BASED DISCUSSION
DetroitYES Awarded BEST OF DETROIT 2015 - Detroit MetroTimes - Best Online Forum for Detroit-based Discussion 2015

ENJOY DETROITYES?


AND HAVE ADS REMOVED DETAILS »





Welcome to DetroitYES! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
DetroitYES! is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to DetroitYES! [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.