Global warming; facts getting in the way of progress.

[ccbatson]

Releasing emails made available by the British FOI laws is neither lying, nor thievery.

On the other hand, the deceptions exposed...now that is lying and thievery on a massive scale.

News organizations do not determine scientific facts and conclusions...never have, and never will.

[rb336]

Tons....Horner's books AND THE REFERENCES, the 1000+ emails detailing the corruption on the alarmists side, and the links on the site I pointed out [[there are dozens, maybe hundreds, more if you like)

1000+ emails are referenced in Horner's book? as for those links, I already checked and debunked all of the ones you've ever posted-- none hold any water. there was one by an actual scientist, but he is notoriously, um, nuts

[elganned]

Releasing emails made available by the British FOI laws is neither lying, nor thievery.

Then why is it continually stated that the emails were made available via a hacking? Making up facts to fit your assertion will not further your argument.

[ccbatson]

LOL...stated by whom?.....wait for it....now, big AHA, and Ohhh, now the big "I get it moment" for the libs.

[elganned]

Stated by every credible news source. Where did you hear it was a FOI request?

[rb336]

obviously he heard it from the mindless right-wing hacks he follows around like a puppy, sniffing and gobbling up every bit of waste that spews from their orifices as if it were nektar from the gods

[ccbatson]

http://foisa.blogspot.com/2009/12/we...ails.html#more

Wow!! do a web search under "british freedom of information act climategate" A PLETHORA of solid hits...way too many to list.

[Jimaz]

I've pulled pranks like this. Too funny: Twitter bot argues with climate change deniers

Debating a stubborn opponent can be an exhausting task, unless, of course, your entire argument is automated.

A software developer has created a Twitter bot that automatically discovers and responds to tweets that are skeptical of global warming.

Nigel Leck's chatbot @AI_AGW, who goes by the name "Turing Test," scans Twitter every five minutes in search of hundreds of terms and phrases that tend to be used by those who think global warming is not occurring or that humans are not responsible for it.

Once the bot finds such a phrase, it tweets a relevant 140 character response.

The bot chooses a response from a database of hundreds of pre-written rebuttals, which often include links to information and videos.

According to Leck, the database originally was just a collection of responses he had written himself, but now the responses include arguments culled from a university source whom he cannot divulge.

Many of those who receive a tweet from @AI_AGW do not realize it is a bot and try to start an argument with it, Leck says....

Go ahead! Rage against the machine if you think it will get you anywhere. LOL!

[Bearinabox]

I've pulled pranks like this. Too funny: Twitter bot argues with climate change deniersGo ahead! Rage against the machine if you think it will get you anywhere. LOL!

This reminds me of a few posters on DetroitYes.

[maxx]

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics...0110622?page=2
"...Nine of the 10 hottest years in history have occurred in the last 13 years. The past decade was the hottest ever measured, even though half of that decade represented a "solar minimum" — the low ebb in the natural cycle of solar energy emanating from the sun..."