Q’antanamo Bay detention camp

**Henry Whalley** · January-13-21, 02:03 AM

There are several hundred empty cages available for warehousing domestic terrorists at Guantanamo. Hardly enough room for all the crazies. We’ll probably need another penitentiary or two. We really need an American Siberia or Botany Bay.

**oladub** · January-13-21, 09:18 AM

Originally Posted by Henry Whalley

There are several hundred empty cages available for warehousing domestic terrorists at Guantanamo. Hardly enough room for all the crazies. We’ll probably need another penitentiary or two. We really need an American Siberia or Botany Bay.

Now emboldened, Democrats across the Country are censoring, canceling, erecting financial barriers and otherwise basking in schadenfreude. Their masks are coming off. Thank you for your example.

What's your plan for segregating the 400 or so Capitol rioters from the thousands of antifa rioters who have been rioting for seven months across the country?

**Honky Tonk** · January-13-21, 09:44 AM

Careful oladub, two guys in a Uber will show up in the middle of the night and tell you to get in the back seat.

**Zacha341** · January-13-21, 09:53 AM

^ Lyft tends to be faster from my experience...

**Zacha341** · January-13-21, 09:55 AM

Don't segregate them! Then we'll really see how the 'mobs are not all equal' really plays out...

...

Originally Posted by oladub

What's your plan for segregating the 400 or so Capitol rioters from the thousands of antifa rioters who have been rioting for seven months across the country?

**Henry Whalley** · January-13-21, 11:29 AM

Originally Posted by oladub

What's your plan for segregating the 400 or so Capitol rioters from the thousands of antifa rioters...across the country?

I was being facetious. But they aren't in same judicial system, i.e., state v. federal courts, riots v. sedition, state v. federal penitentiaries. It's not complicated, Cupcake.

**Richard** · January-13-21, 01:53 PM

^ actually it is complicated,you actually listed every instance that makes it complicated in finding out what charges to bring and who can bring them.

You are forgetting about that whole transfer to the Federal charges in cases that may be called racially motivated,2 years and they have not been able to charge anybody under the federal hate crime act and have it stick,or very few cases.

They can print all kinds of charges that they like to see people receive,but at the end of the day it is a judge and jury that determines things like intent and circumstances etc.

So why have you not pushed to have the ones that took over a city while armed and declared that land thier sovereign territory,would that not be considered a act of war?

You guys threw the whole Democratic socialist aspect in the trash and went straight to the socialist take over of the United States by force.

But that is considered acceptable?

They did not just storm a federal building,they burnt the federal buildings to the ground and took over a city by force,while being armed.

With the blessings of the democrats.

So they can approve of a armed occupation of a United States city and deny those with in it excess to their own property under the threat of death,but then turn around and show fake fear because they actually experienced what American citizens that have been forced to hide in fear all summer long?

How come they encouraged it all summer long and did nothing,until it came knocking on their doorstep,then it becomes dispicable.

So their message is,you can terrorize anybody you want in this country,just not me.

What in your eyes would you call that?

They have been stirring the pot and stoking the flames with encouragement and justification all summer long and had no problem until it came to them.

They do not give a crap that it was in the capital building,they got scared and they did not like it,now they know what it is like for many Americans living in the hood every day of their life and have been for the last 50 years.

**Henry Whalley** · January-13-21, 03:03 PM

Originally Posted by Richard

actually it is complicated...

Which federal buildings?

**Richard** · January-13-21, 03:23 PM

Originally Posted by Henry Whalley

Which federal buildings?

Protesters in Portland marched to a government building Tuesday night, smashing windows and setting an office ablaze in what authorities called a riot.

https://nypost.com/2020/08/19/protes...t-in-portland/

Not to even mention the federal post office buildings that were burned to the ground in Minneapolis.

In one week the insurance claims totaled 2 billion dollars,more then an entire summer of riots in the 1960s.

And that does not include the small businesses that had no insurance or the amount of people with property that was destroyed that also had no insurance.

I guess most were sleeping all summer.

**oladub** · January-13-21, 03:36 PM

Originally Posted by Henry Whalley

I was being facetious. But they aren't in same judicial system, i.e., state v. federal courts, riots v. sedition, state v. federal penitentiaries. It's not complicated, Cupcake.

Trespassing, breaking windows and violence at the Capitol building as well as BLM/antifa's burning down of two Minneapolis post offices and firebomb attacks on Portland's federal building were federal crimes. Almost all the other rioting over the last seven months was done by BLM/antifa protestors. Caveat: 93% of BLM protests were peaceful as were most BLM protesters. But you are partly right. All those state violators would self segregate because leftists did almost all of the non-federal damage and killings in all the states.

I have a video for you that seems to go along with your OP comments.: "The Persecution and Assassination of Jean-Paul Marat as Performed by the Inmates of the Asylum of Charenton Under the Direction of the Marquis de Sade". [[long title)

Roger Ebert wrote, "The actors are superb. When we first see the Marquis [[Patrick Magee), he looks steadily into the camera for half a minute and the full terror of his perversion becomes clearer than any dialog can make it. Glenda Jackson, as Marat's assassin Charlotte Corday, weaves back and forth between the melancholy of her mental illness and the fire of the role she plays. Ian Richardson, as Marat, still advocates violence and revolution even though thousands have died and nothing has been accomplished." [[wikipedia) Just like the BLM/antifa riots and Democrats having spent years on Russiagate and impeachments to perpetrate a coup. I am neither a sadist nor masochist so I very seldom vote for Democrats

**Henry Whalley** · January-13-21, 03:42 PM

Originally Posted by Richard

Protesters in Portland marched to a government building Tuesday night, smashing windows and setting an office ablaze in what authorities called a riot.

Thanks but that was a county building. Hence the charges would be state charges not federal. Also the building wasn't burned to the ground. Terrible though. Not to be condoned.

**Henry Whalley** · January-13-21, 03:55 PM

We don't have a Siberia or Botany Bay. But when Guantanamo is fully booked the rest of insurrectionists could be put to work on chain gangs building the border wall in the Chihuahuan Desert. Also, a good job for convict tRump.

**Richard** · January-13-21, 05:34 PM

Originally Posted by Henry Whalley

Thanks but that was a county building. Hence the charges would be state charges not federal. Also the building wasn't burned to the ground. Terrible though. Not to be condoned.

The Times neglected to report that the Portland protests had been violent, vandalizing a federal courthouse and attempting to set it on fire. Several federal law enforcement officers were also injured after being attacked by demonstrators. Federal officers are not attempting to “put down nightly protests,” but to protect federal buildings local officials will not defend.

You can do a search of federal buildings damage and burned during the riots of 2020.

The question still stands,why was it perfectly acceptable for Democratic leaders to encourage and support the exact same thing that they want to charge republicans with now.

Even more so after they interpreted meaning as to what it was not,when in their case,they literally told people it was okay to attack and rioting was justified?

So why are we not finding charges for their actions and why do they hold everybody else accountable for their actions but feel they are exempt from the very same laws that they are charging others with breaking?

Because nobody is above the law,but me,according to them.

Local democrat officials gave a rats ass about federal buildings when it was their arm of violence destroying them,but let anybody else do something and they are in shock.

Bunch of fake people,then they whine all day about Trump while pretending to take the higher moral ground.

**Meddle** · January-13-21, 07:54 PM

None of which is breeching security lines, beating Capital police officers, threatening US Congress members while in session, theft of secure Government equipment and files .....

**Honky Tonk** · January-14-21, 12:06 AM

Originally Posted by Meddle

None of which is breeching security lines, beating Capital police officers, threatening US Congress members while in session, theft of secure Government equipment and files .....

So it's ok to beat certain Officers but not others? It's acceptable to torch certain level Government buildings but not others? It's fine to hold civilians hostage for five weeks in a make believe city, denying them medical attention and causing death? It's ok to murder certain unarmed civilians but others get a free pass? And who is empowered with making those distinctions, is there a book with guidelines?

**Gistok** · January-14-21, 02:53 AM

The toughening of the laws since last summers rioting are going to be fully used against the Capitol rioters. I bet they didn't see that coming.

**Henry Whalley** · January-14-21, 06:38 AM

Originally Posted by Richard

The Times neglected to report that the Portland protests had been violent...

Which Times?

**Zacha341** · January-14-21, 07:48 AM

^ New York, probably.

Already they are calling the second impeachment:

‘The most bipartisan impeachment’

Was it that bipartisan?

**jcole** · January-14-21, 08:04 AM

Could be London...

Originally Posted by Zacha341

^ New York, probably.

**Henry Whalley** · January-15-21, 05:23 AM

The Rat Islands in the Aleutians might be a good place to put the insurrectionists. Escape would not be easy.

**jcole** · January-15-21, 09:36 AM

Yeah, but Putin could pluck his favorites out of there easier

Originally Posted by Henry Whalley

The Rat Islands in the Aleutians might be a good place to put the insurrectionists. Escape would not be easy.

**Henry Whalley** · January-15-21, 11:24 AM

Originally Posted by jcole

Yeah, but Putin could pluck his favorites out of there easier

Putin can have them all. It would be a less costly solution to deport them all to a measly autocracy.

**Wheels** · January-15-21, 01:42 PM

President Butthead just said we are a country of law not of the people! Is this your president?

They are getting his gitmo cell ready right now!

**Wheels** · January-15-21, 01:57 PM

Some interesting reading here especially for you lefties! Call bullshit all you want the truth is coming out!

https://linktr.ee/kagbabe

**Zacha341** · January-15-21, 02:04 PM

Will my 'puter implode, or will I find myself on some weird list if I click on of those eh, blue links?!

I mean I'll do zerohedge.com once in a while but ......