Lock him up!

[Henry Whalley]

Just sayin’ it would be ironic.

[Wheels]

Just sayin’ it would be ironic.

Where was Nancy hiding today?

[Richard]

She is scared because when she personally contacted the Joint Chiefs to ask them to remove the nuclear codes from President Trump,she committed a seditious act.

Punishable by up to 20 years in prison.

Lock her up

Barbara Walters also got her pissed off when she asked her why she held up stimulus package for political reasons.

She cannot stand it when people question her actions.

[Detroit Stylin]

Where was Nancy hiding today?

More than likely far away from the MAGA crowd

[Richard]

^ from her own crowd,Biden had words with her.

If he does not get bi-partisan support his agenda goes nowhere,and everything gets bogged down quick if the same witch hunts and drama continues like it did for the last four years.

Also with this recent drama that they are trying to charge Trump with sets a precedent in the future.

Think about it,any politician that speaks in front of a crowd and one of their supporters goes and does something illegal,then the politicians can also be charged with it,which is what they are trying to do now.

She is continually creating all this vindictive drama against a man at any cost,some of her own party is beginning to tire from it.

I think we should push for federal sedation charges against her,as she said,nobody is above the law.

She personally tried to collude with the military to help her dictate with a sitting United States President,she had no authority to circumvent the chain of command and go directly to the military.

She acts like she is the president and can do as she pleases.

[Gistok]

^^ As 3rd in line to the presidency... and since #2 is spineless... she is trying to protect the country from a freak show that doesn't want to leave his office, because once he's out of office... he's going to be fair game for a lot of lawsuits both criminal and civil. Which ironically has always been his modus operani... to sue sue sue.

Once he's out of power... we can have one big helping of schadenfreude...

And even after he leaves office... if the senate finds 17 Republican supporters to convict for impeachment... that will bar him from ever holding office again. Probably a win-win for Republicans... and especially for the country and the world [[except for his bromance buddy Putin).

[Henry Whalley]

I think we should push for federal sedation charges against her...

Where were you on Day of Infamy 2021? Sedated?

[Meddle]

Whether he ever sees the inside of a jail cell, there is a very high likelyhood he will be charged with multiple crimes.

[Maof]

She is scared because when she personally contacted the Joint Chiefs to ask them to remove the nuclear codes from President Trump,she committed a seditious act.

Punishable by up to 20 years in prison.

Lock her up

Barbara Walters also got her pissed off when she asked her why she held up stimulus package for political reasons.

She cannot stand it when people question her actions.

It was Lesley Stahl. The question was asked and she answered correcting Stahl. Also, this thread is about Trump, stop deflecting.

[jcole]

They probably ALL should have stayed away from the Senate MAGA crowd; so far 2 congress people have tested positive for Covid after being stuck in a crowded room with Republicans who refused to wear masks.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/09/polit...rnd/index.html

More than likely far away from the MAGA crowd

[Richard]

It was Lesley Stahl. The question was asked and she answered correcting Stahl. Also, this thread is about Trump, stop deflecting.

The title reads lock HIM up,it does not say lock Trump up and leaves it open to interpretation.

In case you have not heard there are no more Hims or hers even though they have not figured out what we are supposed to be anymore.

My interpretation is it was referring to lock Biden up for his self admission of quid-pro-quo in the Ukraine while serving as Vice President,that is actually on video tape of him admitting it.

But then again it is probably better to wait until he becomes president then file impeachment proceedings against him.

Is it a race to see how many Trump sucks threads one can start?

She did not correct Stahl,she deflected and blamed it on the republicans as usual,you know as well as I do there was no way she was giving Trump a win with a stimulus package before the election.

She should have never pressed to give hundreds of millions to foreign countries pork in a United States stimulus package designed to help Americans.

It just shows her vindictiveness and how many Americans she is willing to throw under the bus for her personal agenda and power grabs.

The whole reference of lock him up,if referring to your president Tump and comparing to Hillary is two totally different circumstances,all the drama over something the Supreme Court has already ruled on in the past.

That basically says you cannot take a public speaker and twist their words into something they are are not.

Big difference in smashing evidence with a hammer,you should try that and see what happens to you.

You and I would be buried under the jail.

[Richard]

^^ As 3rd in line to the presidency... and since #2 is spineless... she is trying to protect the country from a freak show that doesn't want to leave his office, because once he's out of office... he's going to be fair game for a lot of lawsuits both criminal and civil. Which ironically has always been his modus operani... to sue sue sue.

Once he's out of power... we can have one big helping of schadenfreude...

And even after he leaves office... if the senate finds 17 Republican supporters to convict for impeachment... that will bar him from ever holding office again. Probably a win-win for Republicans... and especially for the country and the world [[except for his bromance buddy Putin).

So you are justifying democrats being above the law and using any means necessary including trying to use a military coup in order to unseat a United States president.

Then mention Putin while making assumptions based on speculation.

So based on that we can now call up the military in order to remove President elect Biden from office now,because he may or may not step down in 2024.

Do not forget in your haste of scorch and burn in order to remove those who you do not agree with in society.

It sets a precedent to be used against those beyond party lines.

Lower the standards and weaponize the process and it can be used against you just as well.

So she is doing the exact same thing she is accusing others and then saying she is trying to protect the country,so it is acceptable or now justified for politicians to break the laws in order to save the country in their eyes or by their definition?

[Gistok]

So you are justifying democrats being above the law and using any means necessary including trying to use a military coup in order to unseat a United States president.

Then mention Putin while making assumptions based on speculation.

So based on that we can now call up the military in order to remove President elect Biden from office now,because he may or may not step down in 2024.

Do not forget in your haste of scorch and burn in order to remove those who you do not agree with in society.

It sets a precedent to be used against those beyond party lines.

Lower the standards and weaponize the process and it can be used against you just as well.

So she is doing the exact same thing she is accusing others and then saying she is trying to protect the country,so it is acceptable or now justified for politicians to break the laws in order to save the country in their eyes or by their definition?

Nice use of a Slippery Slope logic fallacy there Richard... you're getting more creative in your defense of Trump....

In a slippery slope argument, a course of action is rejected because, with little or no evidence, one insists that it will lead to a chain reaction resulting in an undesirable end or ends. The slippery slope involves an acceptance of a succession of events without direct evidence that this course of events will happen.

[Richard]

Nice use of a Slippery Slope logic fallacy there Richard... you're getting more creative in your defense of Trump....

In a slippery slope argument, a course of action is rejected because, with little or no evidence, one insists that it will lead to a chain reaction resulting in an undesirable end or ends. The slippery slope involves an acceptance of a succession of events without direct evidence that this course of events will happen.

You should read that carefully,then show me where I referenced Trump.

I pointed out the hypocrisy of a party that thinks everything they do is above approach,the evidence is portrayed on the news 24/7 and by the actions.

Nothing to do with a slippery slope,which is what you are trying to do.

Are you actually denying that Pelosi did not call the joint chiefs and ask them to remove the nuclear codes from President Trump,which is illegal to do as President Trump is still the commander in chief.

That was illegal and beyond her scope of power and by your parties very definition attempting to use the military to unsurp a sitting United States president.

Which translates into an attempted military coup by the speaker of the house.

You can try and divert with slippery slopes all you want,it still does not change the facts and nobody is above the law.

Why are you trying to defend your parties actions of trying to overthrow the US government by use of the military but turn around and claim the same charges when a group of protesters enter a building and trash it,no different then what has been happening for the last year,outside of the burning it to the ground.

What do you call it when people were allowed to take over city blocks,while armed and call it their sovereign territory for months on end,disgruntled citizens?

As long as we are posting definitions,let me help you out with one.

Hypocrisy is the practice of engaging in the same behavior or activity for which one criticizes another or the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform. In moral psychology, it is the failure to follow one's own expressed moral rules and principles.

[Bong-Man]

I enjoyed Trump's Twitter shut-down. After coming out 30 hours later with a video showing a different tone, my first thought was we've been here before. Sure enough, he privately regretted the statement, and waited to the next day to start the same cycle of garbage all over again, just like Charlottesville and so many times before. Twitter deservedly shut that trash down quick. They are well within their rights as every Republican including Richard knows. Yet Nunes & crew are on the air crying like little children about the unfairness of it all, just like Richie is here. Go start your own chatroom website. Then you can lie & lie together in one place. Think how Twitter saved us all from the Antifa tweet, today's claim of "very appropriate" activity, etc... Thanks again Twitter. Much appreciated !

Donald Trump deserves to be impeached twice, and I could care less if they left the actual trial in limbo forever, or even if he beats the charges. He, his family, and his enablers deserve as much. A nice stain for history, and a political trivia question for every grade school child for hopefully hundreds of years. Just the ego scratch he deserves.

Now horned Mr. Q-anon is crying from prison he needs organic food. My heart melts. Can we give him some hay to chew on ?

[jcole]

It's not even slippery slope; it's a total misrepresentation of what happened. No one tried to remove Trump from office by coup; Trump attempted a coup after a certified election had occurred. And of course Biden should be removed if he
a. Refuses to accept the results of a certified election and says he will not leave at the end of his term
b. If he incites his followers to a non peaceful riot. [[Which in fact would be hilarious knowing what would probably happen. We'd try to bore them to death with speeches.
)

Nice use of a Slippery Slope logic fallacy there Richard... you're getting more creative in your defense of Trump....

In a slippery slope argument, a course of action is rejected because, with little or no evidence, one insists that it will lead to a chain reaction resulting in an undesirable end or ends. The slippery slope involves an acceptance of a succession of events without direct evidence that this course of events will happen.

[Honky Tonk]

Where was Nancy hiding today?

She's at Love's Furniture shopping for a new office chair.

[Richard]

California Congresswoman Maxine Waters. Back in 2018, Waters told her supporters that if they come across an ally of President Donald Trump in public, “you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them, and you tell them they're not welcome anymore, anywhere.”

Kamala Harris says that the riots are not going to stop, ever, and to BEWARE. With a smile on her face.

“Everyone beware,” Harris exclaimed. “They’re not gonna stop before election day in November, and they’re not gonna stop after election day. They’re not gonna let up and they should not.”

Ocasio-Cortez released a video in which she accused people of being hypocritical if they called for an end to the violence without giving into protesters’ demands.

“If you are calling for an end to this unrest, and if you are a calling for an end to all of this, but you are not calling for the end of the conditions that created the unrest, you are a hypocrite,” she said in the video.

So if you’re out here calling for the end of unrest,” she continued, “then you better be calling for health care as a human right, you better be calling for accountability in our policing, you better be supporting community review boards, you better be supporting the end of housing discrimination … Because if you don’t call for those things and you’re asking for the end of unrest, all you’re asking for is the continuation of quiet oppression.”


Later in the summer, amid the wanton destruction of numerous public statutes across the country, Pelosi seemed to metaphorically shrug when asked about the mobs ripping down public monuments across the country, including in her hometown of Baltimore, where a Christopher Columbus statute was thrown into Baltimore’s Inner Harbor.

While acknowledging that “from a safety standpoint, it would be a good idea to have it taken down if the community doesn’t want it,” Pelosi nevertheless said of the destruction of statutes: “People will do what they do.”

On June 4 of last year, meanwhile, Booker was far more circumspect about the deadly violence that for a week had swept major American cities and seen the killing of well over a dozen people, the burning of at least one police station, major arson events, looting, vandalism and assault.

“I think that there’s an overemphasis, for one, on rioters and looters,” he told New York Magazine, calling those individuals “such a small fraction relative to peaceful protesters and activists.”


I’d like to publicly thank Kamala Harris for telling Americans that the protests [[aka riots) need to continue … and hold her personally responsible for the violence and the medical bills … and yes, the deaths, too,” tweeted Christian author Daniel Bobinski.
“
I lay this at the feet of Congressional Democrats,” he added.
Voters should remember her comments “when you see cities on fire and people attacked,” tweeted Robby Starbuck, a Cuban-American director and producer.

So how many of those democrats are we going to charge with supporting and encouraging and insurrection?

[pjbear05]

Now horned Mr. Q-anon is crying from prison he needs organic food. My heart melts. Can we give him some hay to chew on ?

Early in his confinement at the Florence, CO Supermax, Terry Nichols complained the prison diet was giving him diarrhea. Too bad to both of you, don't associate with murdering bombers or seditious idiots.

[Danny]

The Trump Train will make its last stop to put Trump and supporters into prison.

[Henry Whalley]

The Trump Train will make its last stop to put Trump and supporters into prison.

So true.

[Richard]

One of President Trump’s newest allies in the House said Wednesday night that she will file articles of impeachment against President-elect Joseph R. Biden on Jan. 21, his first day in office, for “abuse of power.”
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, Georgia Republican, cited Mr. Biden’s alleged family business connections with China and Ukraine.
“We have to make sure that our leaders are held accountable, we cannot have a president of the United States that is willing to abuse the power of the office of the presidency and be easily bought off by foreign governments … Chinese energy companies, Ukrainian energy companies,” she said on Newsmax. “So on January 21, I will be filing articles of impeachment on Joe Biden.”

Sense the left has made the decision to continue down the path of division,I applaud this.

Next up we need to have hearings on Pelosi and Shumer for their roles in the Russian conspiracy and the false flag of impeaching a sitting President during the Ukrainian witch hunt.

Let’s make the next 4 years just like the last.

[Henry Whalley]

...she will file articles of impeachment against President-elect Joseph R. Biden on Jan. 21...

yawn

[Zacha341]

OK, so Trumps going to the cornfield, hard. Got that. Bye.

Yet, Biden has his own problems, as this quick-turn, end of term impeachment of Trump will serve as a reminder that he best 'do as told' or find himself on the short end.

[Richard]

yawn

You may yawn now but pay attention to what is going on.

The problem with the left politically weaponizing the impeachment process is it can come back and bite them.

So now they impeached again based on their interpretation on words used.

They held court while trying and convicting without providing due process to the accused,he had a constitutional right to stand before his accused with an attorney present,call witnesses and defend himself.

They made the decision to just say,impeachment because we said so.

It has lowered the bar for future impeachment’s.

Then to make it worse,the senate is out of session until the 19th,so now they want to continue the process after the 20th,posthumously.

If they push to impeach presidents after their term ends then it opens the door to impeach any president from the past.

So impeachment hearings can then be brought up against Obama for also standing by while Americans were getting killed in Benghazi,when he had a sworn duty to protect Americans.

How about somebody just makes a claim about you and they just pick you up and throw you in jail for 20 years,with no ability to use the due process as provided under the constitution?

That is what you are yawning about.

By the standards now set out by the Democratic Party regarding impeachment.

Binden gets impeached for his quid-pro-qou in the Ukraine

Kamala Harris gets impeached for her actions for encouraging and raising funds to support the riots of 2019 that caused billions in property damage,over 1000 police officers to be hurt and the deaths of American citizens.

Talib gets removed from office and charged with inciting violence during the administration by standing up screaming,impeach the MFR. in order to whip up the crowds.

Any politician that pushed the conspiracy theory of Russian collusion based on zero evidence and any attorney that represented anybody in the process gets disbarred.

Shumer gets removed for his role for instigating an impeachment process in order to remove a sitting President based on a whistleblower that never existed and statements from that supposed whistleblower that was actually 3rd party hearsay.

Jerry Nadler is removed for his role in asking for and receiving from then president Bill Clinton a pardon for two women that were tried and convicted and received 50 year prison sentences.

Because they were caught with 27 pounds of dynamite as they were headed to the White House with the intent to blow it up.

Pelosi gets removed for abuse of power for holding impeachment proceedings for political gain and by going directly to the joint chief of staff attempting to remove the nuclear codes from a sitting President in order to usurp him.

That is the standard that has been set and based on the past weeks events,how exactly do you think that whole concept of let’s move on in unity, going to work out?

Thats like punching somebody in the face and then saying sorry,let’s be friends.

Actualy a case could probably be made that the Democratic Party used the guise of trying to remove a sitting President for the last 4 years solely to encourage violence from the far right party in order to create a divided country.