Berkley takes the next step in gender neutral

[Richard]

Well it is official,it is no longer a manhole cover,it is a maintenance hole cover.

"Bondsman" will now be "bonds-person," "firemen" and "firewomen" will now both be referred to as "firefighters," and "manpower" will be replaced with "human effort" or "workforce." Sororities and fraternities will now go by "Collegiate Greek system residence" and a pregnant woman will be referred to as a "pregnant employee."

Notice a pregnant woman is referred to as a pregnant employee.

Think of the ramifications of that,and they say words have meaning.

Right there they are implying that women can only be employees.

To highlight a few.

You no longer have a brother or sister,it will be sibling.

Makes sense why would you want to upset the tiny percentage of those who do not know if they are a man or woman,it is easier to force millions of others to comply.

I guess no more woman’s movement or woman’s soccer team,no more woman’s underwear,ladies it will now be boxers or briefs,cannot even say lady really.

What about the last names from the past?

like Johnson which was dirived from the son of John?

So you cannot call a woman a woman anymore or a she.

You can do catcalls when a woman walks by because she is not longer a woman so you are not disrespectful to her because of her gender,because she has no gender.

No more extra woman’s rights,no more woman owned businesses receiving contracts based on being a woman owned business.

Politicians can no longer claim that we need more women in office,because they are not women any more,just considered another gender that needs to attempt like all the other genders.

Nobody can say that businesses need to have more women as CEOs because they are not women anymore.

This could get really interesting.

What about women’s current names? Can Pam still be considered a woman or does she need to change her name to a more gender neutral name?

What happens to the women that are proud of being a woman they now become just another gender,nothing special.

Its a slippery slope when you choose to remove self identity from a population,it’s kinda like producing a bunch of machines that are easy to control.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/berkele...r-and-firemen/

I guess in theory it is okay for women to walk around topless,they are not women anymore just another gender with extra bits,it’s only fair because the other gender walks around with no shirt on,how exactly does one produce a gender neutral bra,might as well ditch them also.

No more “woman’s rights” because in the world of gender neutral they cannot form a gender specific campaign.

California,as much as you try,to us old school folks a woman will always be a woman and if we wanted to spend time with a non specific,no identity object we would buy a blow up doll,so stick your all imposing regulations up your maintenance hole and leave the rest of the country out of your silliness.