Belanger Park River Rouge
ON THIS DATE IN DETROIT HISTORY - BELANGER PARK »



Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 95
  1. #1

    Default The Many Faces of Kavanaugh? What Other Faces Being REVEALED?

    Much has led up to this, with Feinstein holding back info for perfect timing. Ok, so it's boiling down the finish. Kavanaugh side said he did not do it -- he refuses to step aside. His rep is toast anyway per the mere accusation. One of Ms. Ford's people denies any knowledge of the event.

    However, Ford has expressed that she indeed has corroborating evidence.

    A few extremists are saying that this is the way of all men de rigueur: assault and rape, or lying about assaulting and raping.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/25/o...tion%2Fopinion
    Last edited by Zacha341; September-27-18 at 08:37 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    5,067

    Default

    Now we know why Dotard nominated Kavanaugh. They're like peas in a pod. Bet Dotard is upset he wasn't invited to those parties.

    Anyways, Kavanaugh can take a prison cell next to Cliff Huxtable. I'm sure Dotard can find some other ultra right-wing sycophant who isn't a serial rapist.

  3. #3

    Default

    "He's a good guy"...LOLOL. Who wants a bold face lying rapist on the supreme court for decades?....not I.

  4. #4

    Default

    ^^^ I hear that, so lets take it to the courts just like in the case of Cosby, beyond the court of j'accuse!

    What I want to know is how did he get this far as a sitting judge with this just coming out?
    Last edited by Zacha341; September-26-18 at 08:00 PM.

  5. #5

    Default

    ^ that’s been made clear,it’s because he was brought forward by Trump,you know the resist thing.

    But then again we are discussing a group of people that would have nominated Stormy Danials as the head of the morals committee under the previous Administration.

    Pretty good morals putting a porn star over a sitting judge.yey

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zacha341 View Post

    What I want to know is how did he get this far as a sitting judge with this just coming out?
    Just a guess, but probably because it never actually happened.



    This is the Democrat's favorite new play. Wait until the last second so the other side can't easily react, and throw a hail Mary of accusations of supposed sexual misbehaviors that are older than many voters. They don't care if the accusations are true or false, or if they can be proven or disproven. As long as they time it right, they get their base fired up, trigger a few copycat accusations and hopefully sway the election/confirmation. If it works, great. If it doesn't the public will forget about it days later and the only victim is the reputation of a man that took him a lifetime to build.




    Last edited by Johnnny5; September-26-18 at 03:06 PM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    5,067

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Richard View Post
    Pretty good morals putting a porn star over a sitting judge.yey
    Not sure what Melania has to do with the confirmation hearings. You sure you're posting to the right thread?

    This thread is about the mass sex assaulting clown in the White House apparently trying to ram a SC nomination through without any vetting, and now we find out his nominee practices mass sex assault too.

    Apparently they can't find any right-wing sycophants that aren't serial rapists?
    Last edited by Bham1982; September-26-18 at 03:07 PM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    5,067

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Johnnny5 View Post
    Just a guess, but probably because it never actually happened.
    What would be the basis of your supposition that "it never happened"?

    You believe all these women are all lying under oath, are lying in sworn depositions, and have dozens of liars corroborating their accounts and willing to testify under oath? For what purpose? And how do you explain the confirmed polygraph tests that show they're telling the truth?

    We already know Trump is the most lying public figure in history per Polifact, and we know his nominee is lying, as his claims directly contradict his documented history. We also know the nominee refuses to testify under oath.

    Yet you choose to believe serial liars with everything to gain while not believing normal citizens with nothing to gain. It's called cult worship, and your time is running out.





  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bham1982 View Post
    What would be the basis of your supposition that "it never happened"?

    You believe all these women are all lying under oath, are lying in sworn depositions, and have dozens of liars corroborating their accounts and willing to testify under oath? For what purpose? And how do you explain the confirmed polygraph tests that show they're telling the truth?



    Dr. Ford hasn't taken a sworn deposition under oath.
    Kavanaugh has.

    Dr. Ford doesn't know key details of the story she is telling like where the party happened and when and there is no collaborating evidence from so called close friends of hers that where supposedly there.

    Diane Frankenstein held this information till after the hearing because she couldn't challenge Kavanaugh on his record and by waiting didn't want to have to supply the scanty details of the letter that will be picked apart during a discovery session.

    This is a non provable he said she said but the 5th column mass media and the global socialists love this tactic.
    Well we expect no less from the new fascists.

    Mind control is next. Oh wait they don't have one.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    5,067

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GMan View Post
    This is a non provable he said she said but the 5th column mass media and the global socialists love this tactic.
    Well we expect no less from the new fascists.
    Wow, just wow.

    "I love the uneducated." Truer words were never spoken.

    Cultists aren't gonna budge even when their Dear Leader reports to federal prison. It will all be "a Soros/Clinton/Obama Deep State conspiracy" or something.

  11. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bham1982 View Post
    What would be the basis of your supposition that "it never happened"?
    As a shortcut, read this blurb and mentally replace "Juanita Broaddrick" with "Christine Ford" and "Clinton" with "Kavanaugh"

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juanita_Broaddrick#Public_and_press_reactions

    I'm not saying it didn't happen, but politics is a dirty business.

  12. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bham1982 View Post
    Not sure what Melania has to do with the confirmation hearings. You sure you're posting to the right thread?

    This thread is about the mass sex assaulting clown in the White House apparently trying to ram a SC nomination through without any vetting, and now we find out his nominee practices mass sex assault too.

    Apparently they can't find any right-wing sycophants that aren't serial rapists?
    Lol,he has had a whole published career of vetting and 6 different back ground checks by the FBI.

    What more do you want?

    Ask the senators to reveal the list for the 15 million in payouts,but the left will not do that because it looks bad when you are playing at the higher moral ground game.

    I would pay good money to see you and Melania alone in a room while you call her a whore to her face,I bet she could whoop your but,without breaking a fingernail.

    That is pretty low though,but no surprise,I do not agree with you but I would never disrespect your family because of it.Zero class as they say.

    We will not even go into the Minnesota Democrat senator that just took her oath of office with her hand on the Koran,so all of this is pointless because 20 years down the road,women will be walking four steps behind and whipped back into the kitchen,which is what your goal is anyways.
    Last edited by Richard; September-26-18 at 03:57 PM.

  13. #13

    Default

    Bill Clinton survived because his 'time-and-place' was just ahead of the full-out social media largess [[inclusive of the Me Too movement).

    And enough women looked-over his actions, or worse, [[depending on who you believe) negated the women who brought forth allegations.

    It did buy him an impeachment, from which he rallied. So we shall see how things works out from the POSTUS down 2018 onward.

    Quote Originally Posted by JBMcB View Post
    As a shortcut, read this blurb and mentally replace "Juanita Broaddrick" with "Christine Ford" and "Clinton" with "Kavanaugh"

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juanita_Broaddrick#Public_and_press_reactions

    I'm not saying it didn't happen, but politics is a dirty business.
    Last edited by Zacha341; September-27-18 at 06:03 AM.

  14. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bham1982 View Post
    ...Apparently they can't find any right-wing sycophants that aren't serial rapists?
    Republicans hold their heads so high that they can't see the pants around their ankles.

  15. #15

    Default

    ^^^ Um, I think both side hold their heads high to push their ideology.

    Who's NOT pushing their program/ agenda/ ideology here? For one group it's morals, for the other it is ideology! After all in politics, parties are fighting to win, not LOSE.

    Both think they are right and own the moral high ground.

    I see little exclusivity here.

    What's going to be interesting is how some will turn themselves inside-out over this.

    Considering the actions of 'youths' in other contexts have been disregarded. History shows us that.

    Course there's now another woman who's come forward.

    So we shall see.
    Last edited by Zacha341; September-27-18 at 11:28 AM.

  16. #16

    Default

    I am waiting for a Democrat Santa to run for office, so I can say,when I was 6 [[52 years ago) he had me sit on his lap and asked me if I was naughty.

  17. #17

    Default

    Anyone going on that road may find their own pocket picked. Others too as we're at each others throats in some cases based only on accusations.

    It is going to be interesting how male and female interactions will proceed.

    I'm concerned that women will be taken less serious in legitimate cases, if accusers are discovered to be lying. Just the outcome needed!! Onward to the courts I say at this point, beyond the court-of-opinion.

    Quote Originally Posted by Johnnny5 View Post
    ...This is the Democrat's favorite new play. Wait until the last second so the other side can't easily react, and throw a hail Mary of accusations of supposed sexual misbehaviors that are older than many voters. They don't care if the accusations are true or false, or if they can be proven or disproven. As long as they time it right, they get their base fired up, trigger a few copycat accusations and hopefully sway the election/confirmation...

    Last edited by Zacha341; September-27-18 at 06:06 AM.

  18. #18

    Default

    Update:

    Kavanaugh denies two additional accusations to Senate Judiciary Committee

    https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/26/polit...ons/index.html
    Last edited by Zacha341; September-27-18 at 06:06 AM.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    5,067

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JBMcB View Post
    As a shortcut, read this blurb and mentally replace "Juanita Broaddrick" with "Christine Ford" and "Clinton" with "Kavanaugh"
    A. Bill Clinton isn't up for a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court, Kavanaugh is.

    B. We always knew Bill Clinton was a lady-chasing scoundrel, Kavanaugh claims he was a church-going virgin. Clinton got impeached for his lady-chasing; the worst Kavanaugh will suffer is not getting a lifetime appointment to the SC.

    C. Brodderick denied the assault ever occured, under sworn deposition. These women have confirmed the assaults occured, under sworn deposition.

    D. Whataboutism is the last refuge of those who have no argument. The topic is Kavanaugh, not some public figure from 30 years ago.
    Last edited by Bham1982; September-27-18 at 06:38 AM.

  20. #20

    Default

    Why did Trump pick Kavanaugh [[beyond the birds of a feather response)? There was the option of vetting Amy Barret?

    If this thing blows up that Kavanaugh is indeed guilty of all he's being accused of the repub-ba party will be set back decades. Women will never vote for a republican again. For most centrist and indies life will go on as we tend to not be overly obliged to endorse either, right or wrong. But watch for the extreme agendas within the dem party, ushering forth their morality.

    Worse will be the scorning of those claiming certain incorrect morals -- fevered-pitched. I say take it upon your own council to keep ones hands clean. You'll do best not require edicts of such from the either party!

    And for those so poised celebrate the downfall of Kava [[and for some that extends to all men), check closets for skeletons, very thoroughly.
    Last edited by Zacha341; September-27-18 at 09:04 PM.

  21. #21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zacha341 View Post
    Why did Trump pick Kavanaugh [[beyond the birds of feather response)?...
    IMHO, because Trump wants a judge who believes that a president is immune from criminal investigation or prosecution while in office.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    5,067

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimaz View Post
    IMHO, because Trump wants a judge who believes that a president is immune from criminal investigation or prosecution while in office.
    This. Kavanaugh has been outspoken in his belief that a President cannot be prosecuted. Trump needs Kavanaugh for when the s--- hits the fan re. the Mueller investigation.

  23. #23

    Default

    Goodness let it all be over while we're young! Hah.

  24. #24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bham1982 View Post
    This. Kavanaugh has been outspoken in his belief that a President cannot be prosecuted. Trump needs Kavanaugh for when the s--- hits the fan re. the Mueller investigation.
    Actually he has been outspoken in his belief that a sitting president should be able to forgo prosecution until after leaving office.

    That was in 2009 and there was a law in place that expired,so it became a moot point.

    It was in reference while serving under then president Bush and priorities,should a president face charges or accusations while in the process of dealing with a country emergency,such as like in the middle of 9-11 when it came up.

    Anyways it would be on Congress to institute actions and another court,the only time it would be in front of Kavanagh should he be appointed would be in the appeals process.

    You guys make it out like it is Trump then Kavanagh in the chain,Kavanagh would not even be in the picture until the appeals process up to 5 years down the road and after all the other court systems were exhausted.

    Even at that there are what 5 other judges on the panel? So he is not Trumps little get out of jail card.

    But he is appointed by a sitting president,which is and has been the prerogative of every president ever elected.

    Then president Kennedy appointed 68 different judges into various positions,so did that mean he was stacking the deck in favor of democrats at the time?
    Last edited by Richard; September-27-18 at 03:40 PM.

  25. #25

    Default

    The GOP really crapped the bed hugely on this one. Beyond the allegations, the optics of what went down today are horrendous for the Repubs.

    They could have had an FBI investigation and let them ask all the tough ugly questions out of the public eye first. The accuser even asked for it. But, of course, that would've slowed down their big bum's rush to push Kavanaugh through [[although I sure don't remember them being in such a hurry to even hold hearings for a recent legitimate nominee of a president who was elected with wide popular majorities, twice), and would have given the Democratic stooge confused girlie's charges some official standing. So, no go.

    Instead, they decided to try to publicly take apart a highly educated and articulate woman, talking about a painful and difficult personal experience she clearly had not wished to talk about, who really had no reason to lie. And they did it by cowardly and cynically hiding behind a random female prosecutor they had hired to try to do their hatchet work for them. It looked like they literally thought that if they just used their inquisitor to intimidate her that the little girlie would crack. It is an indicator of the deeply ingrained and entitled sexism of these clueless old Republican farts that they thought this would be a good moment for them.

    Now, whether they can still shove Kavanaugh down our unwilling throats or they give up on him, they have shown themselves up before the country for who they really are. They have made a martyr, a heroine, and a cause celebre out of Dr. Blasey Ford, and most likely the other accusers as well, for decades to come, and they have done even more to set their party back with women voters for goodness knows how long.

    Really a breathtaking performance overall.

Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Instagram
BEST ONLINE FORUM FOR
DETROIT-BASED DISCUSSION
DetroitYES Awarded BEST OF DETROIT 2015 - Detroit MetroTimes - Best Online Forum for Detroit-based Discussion 2015

ENJOY DETROITYES?


AND HAVE ADS REMOVED DETAILS »





Welcome to DetroitYES! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
DetroitYES! is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to DetroitYES! [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.