This is patently false and reveals an overwhelming ignorance across the board. It's clear you have very little engagement with higher education.Higher education has always been about job attainment,unless you are under a socialist system where a doctor makes the same as a general labor,kinda like in Cuba where you can get a lawyer that is hooking for the night because she needs a little extra money to remodel her apartment that has no window glass.
But reading the rest of your post, ignorance appears to be your MO.
With your fingers in your ears and your eyes closed, I'm surprised you're able to even respond to my posts.
But maybe I'm one of the few privileged folks who can readily admit that I have benefited tremendously in multiple aspects of my life with almost zero effort.
Okay you are a socialist. See I agree with you.
That is a pretty vague statement,are you saying that you are doing well because of your education,you can work smarter and not harder or that you have figured out how to work the system so everybody else pays your way?
Or maybe an inheritance?
TMI but when my parents passed and everything went to probate the judge gave my younger sisters 3 million a piece,they allready had the highest education one can achieve in thier field of study,a new house paid for and a new car paid for and they never worked a day in thier life by age 35,he gave me $10,000,$5000 towards lawyer fees and $5000 because I caught the probate lawyers padding the fees.
The judges reason behind this? Because my sisters were dependent on the money and because I had paid my own way in life I was not dependent on the funds.
That was a liberal Minnesota judge that believes it is better to take care of those who choose not to take care of themselves.
Most religions are based on compassion for others,with the exception of radical Muslims where you just kill everybody that you do not agree with,but it was Mrs Roosevelt that implemented the time based hand up verses the life long commitment which encourages some to choose not to excel to their abilities,that is where the way was lost.
When it comes to the disabled,mentality ill,handicapped,elderly,I do not believe that there is any religion based in this country that advocates throwing them in the street.
Last edited by Richard; July-13-17 at 01:52 PM.
If you don't know what I meant in 2017, you're not willing to acknowledge the truth.That is a pretty vague statement,are you saying that you are doing well because of your education,you can work smarter and not harder or that you have figured out how to work the system so everybody else pays your way?
Or maybe an inheritance?
TMI but when my parents passed and everything went to probate the judge gave my younger sisters 3 million a piece,they allready had the highest education one can achieve in thier field of study,a new house paid for and a new car paid for and they never worked a day in thier life by age 35,he gave me $10,000,$5000 towards lawyer fees and $5000 because I caught the probate lawyers padding the fees.
The judges reason behind this? Because my sisters were dependent on the money and because I had paid my own way in life I was not dependent on the funds.
That was a liberal Minnesota judge that believes it is better to take care of those who choose not to take care of themselves.
Most religions are based on compassion for others,with the exception of radical Muslims where you just kill everybody that you do not agree with,but it was Mrs Roosevelt that implemented the time based hand up verses the life long commitment which encourages some to choose not to excel to their abilities,that is where the way was lost.
When it comes to the disabled,mentality ill,handicapped,elderly,I do not believe that there is any religion based in this country that advocates throwing them in the street.
|
Bookmarks