TPP - The Trans-Pacific Partnership’s glaring double standard

[Zacha341]

The Trans-Pacific Partnership’s glaring double standard

http://www.salon.com/2015/06/28/the_trans_pacific_partnershipis_a_plutocrats_dream _partner/

Obama's new pact provides legal rights to corporations that it does not extend to unions and public interest groups

From article:

In promoting a proposed trade pact covering 12 Pacific Rim nations, President Obama has cast the initiative as an instrument of equity. The Trans-Pacific Partnership would, in his words, “level the playing field” and “give our workers a fair shot.” But critics argue that within the hundreds of pages of esoteric provisions, the deal — like similar ones before it — includes a glaring double standard: It provides legal rights to corporations and investors that it does not extend to unions, public interest groups and individuals.

Recently leaked drafts of the agreement show the pact includes the kind of “Investor-State Dispute Settlement” [[ISDS) provisions written into most major trade deals passed since the North American Free Trade Agreement. Those provisions allow companies to use secretive international tribunals to sue sovereign governments for damages when those governments pass public-interest policies that threaten to cut into a corporation’s profits or seize a company’s property.

But also like past trade deals, the TPP is not expected to allow unions and public-interest groups to bring their own suits in the same tribunals to compel governments to enforce labor, environmental and human rights laws.

[jiminnm]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...ould-you-care/

[Bobl]

"Obama's new pact provides legal rights to corporations that it does not extend to unions and public interest groups..."
While this is a huge mistake by the President, I would not call this his new pact. He is simply joining with many republicans and democrats. The agreement is written by, and for the benefit of, multinational corporations. It is not written for the benefit of employees or consumers, union members or not. The President would seem to know better than to muddy his legacy like this, but when one follows the money it is understood. Follow the money. Lots of money.

[det313grrl]

Zacha341, thanks for posting this. Good to see not everyone has their head in the sand.