Belanger Park River Rouge
ON THIS DATE IN DETROIT HISTORY - DOWNTOWN PONTIAC »



Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 8
Results 176 to 178 of 178
  1. #176

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ghettopalmetto View Post
    When your transit "system" is as half-assed as DDOT and SMART, *of course* it's going to be the means of last resort. If you go to New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, Boston, DC--you know, cities that consciously *invest money in transit*--you'll find people of all stripes riding transit...
    Agreed. In the Chicago office I worked at, a very large percentage of people from all levels of the company rode the buses and trains to work. Many also owned very nice cars but chose transit for the savings vs fuel usage. Many rode more than 20 miles one way too. They had nothing but good things to say about it.

  2. #177

    Default

    Use of public transit for commuting

    Such transit must be safe, convenient, and not too much longer than auto commuting.
    Such transit must also have extended hours for when you have to be in the office early or have to work late.

  3. #178

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 48307 View Post
    Sure! Hopefully this won't sound condescending.

    Cars and trucks both use the same roads. The roads are designed to accommodate both types of vehicles.

    Trucks move goods.

    Cars move people.

    If our region invests heavily in mass transit, and people started favoring using mass transit instead of cars, then less people would use cars.

    If less people use cars, then that means that less people are using freeways and streets, or at the very least using them more efficiently.

    When there is less demand for our road network, then it doesn't need to be so robust and wide.


    So, mass transit means less cars, less cars means the need for less freeways. We can get rid of some the redundant freeways, while still providing freeways for trucks to move goods. Many of the freeways in Detroit are very redundant, the trucks don't need that kind of redundancy because their goals are more long term, and the convenience of I-96 vs I-94 doesn't matter as long as it can get them to Chicago and beyond.
    Nice try, but here's what we really want to happen.

    1) More mass transit means Detroit becomes more vital.

    2) More vitality results in increased demand for Detroit, and more traffic.

    3) Mass transit fills to capacity and riders demonstrate against the State for withholding funds,

    4) Freeway use goes up because Detroit's the place to be, and drivers recall state legislators who refuse to spend the excess income tax revenue money created by Detroit's increased economy on roads.

Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 8

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Instagram
BEST ONLINE FORUM FOR
DETROIT-BASED DISCUSSION
DetroitYES Awarded BEST OF DETROIT 2015 - Detroit MetroTimes - Best Online Forum for Detroit-based Discussion 2015

ENJOY DETROITYES?


AND HAVE ADS REMOVED DETAILS »





Welcome to DetroitYES! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
DetroitYES! is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to DetroitYES! [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.