Belanger Park River Rouge
ON THIS DATE IN DETROIT HISTORY - DOWNTOWN PONTIAC »



Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 28
  1. #1

    Default New Railroad Tracks on Mt. Elliott

    It looks like GM and/or some other business in the area is rerouting the railroad tracks that used to circle the north side of the Poletown plant. Mt. Elliott is now closed from I-94 to Conant to install new tracks across from the Poletown plant to the other steel/metal works businesses on the east side of the street. There are detours posted that loop you around the plant to E. Grand Blvd. to get around it. I don't know who's putting these in, but I wish I knew how long it might take. Anyone have any additional information?

  2. #2

    Default

    Are they connecting those to the tracks that go across 94 by the Packard Plant? Looks like that could be a connection point across Mt. Elliot, although I think others on here have mentioned that those tracks are out of commission. Possibly a connection to the scrap steel yard over there?

  3. #3

    Default

    Nah, these are for that secret underground government facility across the street from the Poletown plant. Who's going to have money to install rail lines? Not scrap yards...

  4. #4

    Default

    This is a part of the trackwork that is necessary in order for the "MI train" to operate, the commuter rail that SEMCOG has been talking about for years and years. One of the two big things holding that project up is that the freight railways demanded improvements to the track setup in midtown so that more frequent passenger trains won't delay freight movements.

    Note that "MI train" is a completely different animal than "M1 Rail".

  5. #5

    Default

    Try this! I believe the CN[[Canadian National) is no longer interested in dealing with GM. The track work may be under way so CONRAIL can access the GM assembly plant. The plant probably can use rail access so this is what may be happening. CONRAIL had access to the Plymouth assembly plant and hauled many cars from the plant in the 60's and 70's.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stinger4me View Post
    CONRAIL had access to the Plymouth assembly plant and hauled many cars from the plant in the 60's and 70's.
    Actually, Conrail was only created in 1976. So it might have been Penn Central or the New York Central that served the assembly plant in the 1960's.

  7. #7

    Default

    I had posted previously that when GM announced they would spend about
    45 million to establish a logistic center at Hamtramck Assembly, they also
    announced they would spend about three million to reestablish rail connections
    to the Hamtramck Assembly plant. They are now producing Volts, Ampuras,
    and Malibus at Hamtramck. I presume that the construction on Mount
    Elliott is to tie Hamtramck into the national rail network once again.

  8. #8

    Default

    This is my usual entry point into Hamtown coming from points east, and yeah, it's kind of an unexpected headache.

    It never struck me as being all that difficult to get from Milwaukee Junc to the Yard under the Mound / Mt. Elliot overpass, [[which is officially named????) as the tracks that run the south side of Veterans Park [[and both viaducts) link the two together. And what if CN owns the spur leading into the north side of the plant? They can't share? But what do I know about RR track rights?

    Unless they need extra tracks [[one in and one out) to link to the east yard?

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hamtragedy View Post
    And what if CN owns the spur leading into the north side of the plant? They can't share?
    Yes, CN does own that spur and the reason why it's not used any more:

    Quote Originally Posted by Stinger4me View Post
    Try this! I believe the CN[[Canadian National) is no longer interested in dealing with GM.
    I think this is also why the short spur from Pontiac north to the Orion plant [[this particular track passes to the east of Great Lakes Crossing) is no longer used.

  10. #10

    Default

    Well, I guess it answers my question as I read before. But I should be inconvenienced why? Because two conglomerates don't want to get along? And who's paying for this? Because I don't know.

    I mean, we can have a rail crossing installed on Mt. Elliot, but we can't have streetlights?

  11. #11

    Default

    It's a new route for the Polar Express

  12. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hamtragedy View Post
    Well, I guess it answers my question as I read before. But I should be inconvenienced why? Because two conglomerates don't want to get along? And who's paying for this? Because I don't know.

    I mean, we can have a rail crossing installed on Mt. Elliot, but we can't have streetlights?
    Buy a flashlight.

    Streetlights are a convenience, paid for by taxes.

    Rail lines feed our industries that feed our people. That provide jobs.

    New investment by industry in Detroit isn't something to complain about in any way. Celebration is called for.

    Oh¸and if you encourage industry you will get taxes and you'll get your lights fixed and can sell your flashlight on ebay.

  13. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wesley Mouch View Post
    Buy a flashlight.

    Streetlights are a convenience, paid for by taxes.

    Rail lines feed our industries that feed our people. That provide jobs.

    New investment by industry in Detroit isn't something to complain about in any way. Celebration is called for.

    Oh¸and if you encourage industry you will get taxes and you'll get your lights fixed and can sell your flashlight on ebay.
    I agree that the rail is good, streetlights are not connected. However, Google "Poletown Plant Tax Breaks"... they got tax breaks to build it, the land for free, and got another $2Million + from Detroit and Hamtramck for the latest round of upgrades.

  14. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cramerro View Post
    I agree that the rail is good, streetlights are not connected. However, Google "Poletown Plant Tax Breaks"... they got tax breaks to build it, the land for free, and got another $2Million + from Detroit and Hamtramck for the latest round of upgrades.
    Google: "Economic viability of Hamtramack without the plant". You'll get no results.

  15. #15

    Default

    Didn't GM buy the land where Hamtramck Assembly is located? To be sure,
    the city and state used their authority to remove residents from the
    area and helped to assemble the land. However, I thought that GM
    paid for the land. Maybe I am mistaken about that. I think GM has
    invested almost 300 million in that plant since their bankruptcy.

  16. #16

    Default

    Selective tax breaks should be banned, along with political redistricting. But they are the lifeblood of politicians -- so don't expect to see that happen anytime soon.

    Although tax breaks are evil and bad policy, I'm glad that our cities and state are playing the game. If we don't -- we become a less-desirable place to operate a business. Sad, but sometimes we do things that are distasteful.

    Whether or not we paid GM $2m in tax credits doesn't matter. GM and their rail friends needed the line. It would have happened anyway. Withholding that $2m would not have stopped the rail investment. GM just takes the breaks because they can. And if they don't, they're fools because I'll bet Ford, Chrysler, and Tesla take any breaks they can. We are the fools for offering something and thinking that it really changes corporate action.

    Bravo, GP for Life... most succinct post of the month. I strive to be succinct. I fail.

  17. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wesley Mouch View Post
    If we don't -- we become a less-desirable place to operate a business.

    Bravo, GP for Life... most succinct post of the month. I strive to be succinct. I fail.
    Thank you.

    However, the fact that places have to make selective accommodations to producers illustrates to me one gleaming ray of sunshine that literally warms my soul and replenishes my diminished faith in society. The looters still need the producers and they haven't forgotten it.

  18. #18

    Default

    "selective accommodations" = corporate welfare

  19. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Novine View Post
    "selective accommodations" = corporate welfare
    I share your distaste -- but I don't see how it is corporate welfare.

    In general, Corporate Tax Exemptions aren't given to needy corporations. They benefit larger rich companies that should be making their decisions for other reasons -- like locating in States with strong RTW laws that protect employees from predatory unions.

    I've never understood why some law like the Equal Protection clause in the constitution can't be used to stop cities and states from giving away tax favors.

  20. #20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wesley Mouch View Post
    I've never understood why some law like the Equal Protection clause in the constitution can't be used to stop cities and states from giving away tax favors.
    Tenth Amendment.

    You might be able to get away with it under the interstate commerce clause, if and only if, whatever law limited it to companies that didn't do business across state lines.

  21. #21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GP For Life View Post
    Google: "Economic viability of Hamtramack without the plant". You'll get no results.
    I [[honestly) wonder how the tax benefits of the affected properties [[1,400 homes and 140 businesses) compare to what the plant generates. Industrial taxes are high [[due to high value of the property and machinery), so I'm pretty sure it wouldn't even compare. On the other hand, it is difficult to place a value on a vibrant neighborhood, and the plant certainly isn't keeping city residents employed [[Ham or Det).

  22. #22

    Default

    Sorry for trying to derail this tread, pun intended, but does anyone have any info on the West Detroit Connection. This project laid intended to put in a seperate rail line from the Dearborn terminal to the Detroit terminal to seperate the passanger traffic from the freight traffic. It was announced several times in the paper that this project was funded and it would start in early 2013. Consulted the semcog site but I found no updates. Any info would be greatly appreciated.

  23. #23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mtburb View Post
    I think this is also why the short spur from Pontiac north to the Orion plant [[this particular track passes to the east of Great Lakes Crossing) is no longer used.
    That spur from Pontiac to the Orion plant is what remains of the Pontiac, Oxford, and Northern RR which once ran from Pontiac, north through Oxford, through the "thumb", to a terminus at Caseville on Lake Huron. It came under Grand Trunk [[CN) control and was abandoned [[except for the part servicing the Orion plant) in the late 50s. I saw a photo spread on it once. It was a typical little rural rail line.

  24. #24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cramerro View Post
    I [[honestly) wonder how the tax benefits of the affected properties [[1,400 homes and 140 businesses) compare to what the plant generates. Industrial taxes are high [[due to high value of the property and machinery), so I'm pretty sure it wouldn't even compare. On the other hand, it is difficult to place a value on a vibrant neighborhood, and the plant certainly isn't keeping city residents employed [[Ham or Det).
    Let's put direct property tax aside, and look briefly at the payroll taxes generated.

    How many jobs at Detroit-Hamtramck Assembly? Well, I don't know. Let's guess 800 to be safe. Average UAW hourly wage w/ benefits? About $50. Let's use $30. Hours worked per year, about 2,000. So 800x30x2000 = $48m paid annually to workers in our area without thinking about spinoff [[companies that mow the lawn, gas stations that fill trucks...)

    So we can either have $48 million annually in our community, or we can ask for $2m less in tax exemptions that while repulsive, are nothing next to the cash directed at greater Detroit.

    Yeah, UAW members mostly don't live in Detroit or Hamtramck. UAW are paid above average wages, thus they can afford above average homes. The plant may not be directly hiring immediate local residents. But they are contributing taxpaying residents of metro Detroit.

  25. #25

    Default

    Word has it that when GM took the plunge as the economy tanked in 08/09 CN took a pretty big hit with it, and when the govt came in to help GM out, CN was put in a really bad position, creating much distaste between the two. CN still pulls GMs from some plants, but not as many as before. They removed their switch from Milwaukee Junction into the BOC [[Hamtramck Assembly) Yard [[which stands for Buick-Oldsmobile-Cadillac, since that's what they first built there). Conrail's Shared Assets mainline parallels the CN line at Milwaukee Jct. on the north side, but I could see CN being very unfriendly to Conrail jobs trying to cross their line to get into a plant they used to switch, so Conrail is building their own access line along an old right-of-way across Mt. Elliot just north of 94 to gain access to the east side of the plant. I believe the state is paying for this new rail spur to be built. Complain all you want about tax money - state money built the old CN spur into the plant decades ago, too.

    If you read this thread [[link below) you can see some photos and get some interesting insights from railroaders and railfans about the Hamtramck plant and BOC Yard, construction, and operation. I for one am glad to see the BOC yard will be back in use again!

    http://members4.boardhost.com/OtherM...387042908.html

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Instagram
BEST ONLINE FORUM FOR
DETROIT-BASED DISCUSSION
DetroitYES Awarded BEST OF DETROIT 2015 - Detroit MetroTimes - Best Online Forum for Detroit-based Discussion 2015

ENJOY DETROITYES?


AND HAVE ADS REMOVED DETAILS »





Welcome to DetroitYES! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
DetroitYES! is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to DetroitYES! [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.