Belanger Park River Rouge
ON THIS DATE IN DETROIT HISTORY - DOWNTOWN PONTIAC »



Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 26 to 44 of 44
  1. #26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hortonz View Post
    Detroit will never be the city it was a generation ago when it became a magnet for the best and brightest as well as thousands of unskilled and semi-skilled workers looking for a shot at the American dream. Even Windsor will never be what it once was back when the auto industry was booming and folks were flocking here in droves for a chance to work in the car factories. However, both cities face the same problems and together they can help each other rebuild and diversify their economies for a more sustainable future. Maybe Pittsburgh should be Detroit's model.

    They will both weather things out and reclaim their rightful place.

  2. #27

    Default

    Detroit has one important advantage going into the future that will set it apart from cities like Toronto, Los Angeles and New York. It's already been downsized, or "right-sized" to use James Howard Kunstler's words, so when the long economic contraction of the 21st century hits it's peak the city won't be left with a lot of excess office, retail and residential capacity. A city full of 50-storey condo towers won't function very well in a future of scarce natural resources and punishing climate change.

  3. #28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hortonz View Post
    Detroit has one important advantage going into the future that will set it apart from cities like Toronto, Los Angeles and New York. It's already been downsized, or "right-sized" to use James Howard Kunstler's words, so when the long economic contraction of the 21st century hits it's peak the city won't be left with a lot of excess office, retail and residential capacity. A city full of 50-storey condo towers won't function very well in a future of scarce natural resources and punishing climate change.
    "Detroit, no longer the Motor City, is the now the Post-Apacalyptic City", yeah that's something to hang our hat on.

  4. #29

    Default

    Unless Detroit becomes the main military manufacturer of the world, I don't believe that Detroit will reach the level of wealth that it once had. however it is important to remember that Detroit was still a major city before it became the motor city, so with that in mind, I do think that the city can become fairly big again

  5. #30

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 401don View Post
    "Detroit, no longer the Motor City, is the now the Post-Apacalyptic City", yeah that's something to hang our hat on.
    We'll see how well all those "wonderful" urban experiments like Vancouver, Seattle and Manhattan function in a future where everything from capital for new construction to manufactured building components to oil and natural gas become scarce or non-existent and the aging electricity grid begins to wobble and fail. Rome went from being the administrative capital of a giant empire with a population of one million in the first century AD to an agricultural backwater of 15,000 by the 15th century,

  6. #31

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hortonz View Post
    We'll see how well all those "wonderful" urban experiments like Vancouver, Seattle and Manhattan function in a future where everything from capital for new construction to manufactured building components to oil and natural gas become scarce or non-existent and the aging electricity grid begins to wobble and fail. Rome went from being the administrative capital of a giant empire with a population of one million in the first century AD to an agricultural backwater of 15,000 by the 15th century,
    Predicting the demise of well-functioning cities in 1,500 years? Sounds like sour grapes to me.

    Right now, yes, those urban experiments are wonderful, and what differs from Rome is that there's a lot of intelligent people attempting to resolve the scarcity issue rather than living like unsustained gluttons.

    When Detroit actually has the wherewithall to implement a curbside recycling program, as a start, then you can start throwing stones.

  7. #32

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by michimoby View Post
    When Detroit actually has the wherewithall to implement a curbside recycling program, as a start, then you can start throwing stones.
    Detroit does have a curbside recycling program, at least in some neighborhoods.

  8. #33

    Default

    Predicting the end of Vancouver, Seattle, and Manhattan is probably premature. Not to mention that even when the availability of materials and energy become low, all three cities have the eco-systems to adapt to changing environments...something we in Detroit could use a little more of.

    We do have curbside recycling, but it's not offered by the city. $15/mo. not too shabby, though, and I'm glad to support a new business here.

  9. #34

    Default

    That's right. A friend lives in the Curtis/ Livernois area and they have had Reclying for about a year now.

    Quote Originally Posted by mwilbert View Post
    Detroit does have a curbside recycling program, at least in some neighborhoods.

  10. #35

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by michimoby View Post
    When Detroit actually has the wherewithall to implement a curbside recycling program, as a start, then you can start throwing stones.
    If you're environmentally concious, you can always drop off your recyclables here: http://www.recyclehere.net/ They're open several days a week, it's free, a great bunch of people, and you're helping a small Detroit-based business. [[and the environment).

  11. #36

    Default no other way

    Quote Originally Posted by dtowncitylover View Post
    Of course not as racist right?

    I'd love to see an integrated Detroit. American cities still to this day [[Cleveland, Boston, Chicago, New York) still have their "white", "black", and "immigrant" neighborhoods. I'd love to see a Detroit where integration is key to our success.
    Moral sentiments aside, there is no other way. Otherwise, racial fear and polarization will continue to kill and diminish not just the City of Detroit, but the entire metropolitan area.

  12. #37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Honky Tonk View Post
    If you're environmentally concious, you can always drop off your recyclables here: http://www.recyclehere.net/ They're open several days a week, it's free, a great bunch of people, and you're helping a small Detroit-based business. [[and the environment).
    Yes, I know Matt Naimi and the outstanding program he undertakes.

    And I apologize for my previous comment, because I said it knowing full well about this program. But I was attempting to offer up a comparison point: every one of the cities that the commenter mentioned -- Vancouver, Seattle, and NYC -- has waste management and resource preservation ingrained in its citizens' minds [[NYC a little less so, but still). Detroit isn't there, and even Recycle Here has its resource limitations.

    My understanding is that the only curbside program in Detroit, at the moment, is in the Detroit Works Demo Area 1.

  13. #38

    Default

    It all depends on many factors. Essential in the argument is whether we restore a fairly dense urban core, or just continue to attempt to make the city as another member here so eloquently put it "another shitty suburb."

    The idea that major urban centers are unsustainable due to a scarcity of resources is fairly ridiculous. The scarcity of resources is much more likely to destroy inefficient single dwellings and cripple individual fossil fuel transportation than multi-resident buildings and mass transit. It may be true that living in a rural bunker provides the best option for survival no matter whether we run out of everything, an asteroid crashes into us or zombies start eating people... but the likelihood is that you'll just be living a solitary life and die sheltered and alone.

    I personally feel the more Detroit would concentrate on building walkable neighborhoods with mass transit options the healthier it will be. We can already see what drivable neighborhoods with individual homes offers.

  14. #39

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by michimoby View Post

    My understanding is that the only curbside program in Detroit, at the moment, is in the Detroit Works Demo Area 1.
    That is certainly plausible; the only places I know it is happening are in Demo area 1.

  15. #40

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jtf1972 View Post
    The idea that major urban centers are unsustainable due to a scarcity of resources is fairly ridiculous. The scarcity of resources is much more likely to destroy inefficient single dwellings and cripple individual fossil fuel transportation than multi-resident buildings and mass transit.
    I agree with your entire comment, but especially this part. What sets Detroit apart from "functioning" cities is that functioning cities manage their resources much more efficiently, whether it be land, energy or transportation. New York is one of the most efficient cities in the country, if not the entire western world. Efficient use of resources doesn't seem to have ever been part of Detroit's ideology...
    Last edited by iheartthed; May-01-13 at 09:59 AM.

  16. #41

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by michimoby View Post
    Yes, I know Matt Naimi and the outstanding program he undertakes.

    And I apologize for my previous comment, because I said it knowing full well about this program. But I was attempting to offer up a comparison point: every one of the cities that the commenter mentioned -- Vancouver, Seattle, and NYC -- has waste management and resource preservation ingrained in its citizens' minds [[NYC a little less so, but still). Detroit isn't there, and even Recycle Here has its resource limitations.

    My understanding is that the only curbside program in Detroit, at the moment, is in the Detroit Works Demo Area 1.
    Honestly? And I hope I don't offend you, [[or anyone else for that matter), Detroit has some SERIOUS issues, and recycling isn't one of them. Funding City services is. Until some some cash flow gets going, and it truly becomes a place where established people with money would consider moving to, everyone is just blowing smoke with these pie-in-the-sky ideas and discussions. Why doesn't the City provide multiple colored recepticles, so all I have to do is look @ them and know what goes where?????

  17. #42

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Honky Tonk View Post
    Honestly? And I hope I don't offend you, [[or anyone else for that matter), Detroit has some SERIOUS issues, and recycling isn't one of them. Funding City services is. Until some some cash flow gets going, and it truly becomes a place where established people with money would consider moving to, everyone is just blowing smoke with these pie-in-the-sky ideas and discussions. Why doesn't the City provide multiple colored recepticles, so all I have to do is look @ them and know what goes where?????
    No offense taken, HT -- the discussion around recycling is a subset of the "city resource utilization" discussion we're having, I think. Cities with more effective resource management can find a lot of wins wrt cost reduction; recycling is one of many programs part of that effort.

    It's tangential, sure, but not orthogonal to the topic at hand.

  18. #43

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Danny View Post
    If 50 percent of white middle class folks remained in Detroit more regionalization will come. It worked in New York City.

    If 50 percent of black middle class folks remained in Detroit regionalization will still come. It worked in Altanta.

    If 50 percent of middle class hispanic remained in Detroit still more regionalization will come. It worked in Los Angeles.


    Detroit lost its middle class base long time ago. All we see is its ancient fossils dating back to 1910. The best we could do its cope, rebuild and hope.
    Atlanta doesn't qualify. It has more sprawl than Detroit. Nobody lives in the central city anymore, and you have to drive damn near everywhere to get to anything.

  19. #44

    Default

    One real positive Detroit has is that there is a name recognition that is worldwide. You say "Detroit" and people want to know more. If Detroit ever gets itself together the world will notice. You can't say that about every city down on its luck.

    In fact, it's odd that outside of Detroit there tends to be more positivity about Detroit than in this area. I dare say that the biggest hurdle Detroit must overcome is entirely centered in and around the city itself.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Instagram
BEST ONLINE FORUM FOR
DETROIT-BASED DISCUSSION
DetroitYES Awarded BEST OF DETROIT 2015 - Detroit MetroTimes - Best Online Forum for Detroit-based Discussion 2015

ENJOY DETROITYES?


AND HAVE ADS REMOVED DETAILS »





Welcome to DetroitYES! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
DetroitYES! is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to DetroitYES! [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.