Belanger Park River Rouge
ON THIS DATE IN DETROIT HISTORY - BELANGER PARK »



Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1

    Default ...and now MDOT sues DIBC!!!

    This is gonna get ugly.

    MDOT sues bridge firm over 'illegal' facilities in Ambassador Bridge project

    Tom Greenwood / The Detroit News

    MDOT filed a lawsuit Wednesday afternoon demanding that the Detroit International Bridge Co. be required to tear out numerous facilities it has "illegally" installed near the span as its part of the Ambassador Bridge Gateway project.

    The disputed facilities include custom booths, filling stations for cars and trucks as well as a duty free shop. If required to do so, the removal of the structures could cost the DIBC tens of millions of dollars.
    According to MDOT, the DIBC breached its contract by making changes to the original construction plan without consulting the state agency, including:
    • The illegal confiscation of 23rd Street running north from Fort Street.
    • Failure to build an elevated roadway over 23rd Street which would have given the public access to 23rd Street.
    • Failure to build a two-lane road leading to the land-locked Lafayette Bait Shop at Lafayette and 23rd.
    • Failure to build a two-lane truck road and the construction of Pier 19.
    • Failure to reimburse MDOT $500,000 the state spent to acquire property needed by the DIBC for its portion of the Gateway Project.
    "When we ask them what they were doing they told us not to worry, that they were building on their own property. We asked for plans and they only sent partial prints."
    Kratofil said the DIBC built their facilities on property owned by Detroit, and then asked the city to vacate that property. The issue went before the Detroit City Council and they said "no."

  2. #2
    Stosh Guest

    Default

    Now that's playing hardball. Good for MDOT.

  3. #3
    Lorax Guest

    Default

    Bravo MDOT!

    You need to grow a pair to fight billionaire fascists like the Matted Moron.

    A little humility might suit DIBC better.

  4. #4

    Default

    Boy oh boy is Maroun ever getting hurt without his boy Kwame. Might as well just sell the bridge adn train station and reinvest in New Orleans if Carolyn and Jenny lose their jobs.

  5. #5

    Default

    Way to go MDOT Tony!!
    You are the "MAN"!

  6. #6
    LodgeDodger Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stosh View Post
    Now that's playing hardball. Good for MDOT.
    I'm actually amazed MDOT stood up to DIBC. Talk about a huge waste of money on the DBIC's part.

  7. #7
    Stosh Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LodgeDodger View Post
    I'm actually amazed MDOT stood up to DIBC. Talk about a huge waste of money on the DBIC's part.
    I've seen this strategy before. It's the [[play on the Field of Dreams, sorry ) "first you build it, then act dumb" strategy. It's like, "it's already there, what are you going to do, make us tear it down?"

    Yep. And it's the state, not your councilpeople.

  8. #8
    MIRepublic Guest

    Default

    Good on MDOT, and I, too, was surprised.

    So, what's this, two suits by two different parties, now [[i.e. Coast Guard & MDOT)? Now, we just need the municipal governments to bring the weight of the law down on them and have the third one be the charm.

  9. #9

    Default

    The excellent highway gossip site www.tollroadsnews.com has posted the entire 35-page complaint by Mike Cox on behalf of MDOT against the Ambassador Bridge. It sounds like if the court agrees with MDOT, Matty Moroun could be on the hook for building his part of the Gateway project, or his bond issuer owes the state $35 million. That would make one pissed-off insurance company. And failing construction of the project as agreed with USDOT, Moroun would get a bill for the $135 million that the state might have to pay back to Washington.

    This is gonna be fun . . .

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MIRepublic View Post
    Good on MDOT, and I, too, was surprised.

    So, what's this, two suits by two different parties, now [[i.e. Coast Guard & MDOT)? Now, we just need the municipal governments to bring the weight of the law down on them and have the third one be the charm.
    The city has already brought a couple lawsuits against the DIBC for the Illegal seizure of 23rd street and Illegal occupation if the riverside park extension.... So all three forms of government have filed suit....

  11. #11

    Default

    Just when I was missing the drama of Kwame and the prospects of a drawn out Monica Conyers trial looked dim.... MDOT and the DBIC step up to the plate!!

    This really is the city that keeps on giving...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Instagram
BEST ONLINE FORUM FOR
DETROIT-BASED DISCUSSION
DetroitYES Awarded BEST OF DETROIT 2015 - Detroit MetroTimes - Best Online Forum for Detroit-based Discussion 2015

ENJOY DETROITYES?


AND HAVE ADS REMOVED DETAILS »





Welcome to DetroitYES! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
DetroitYES! is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to DetroitYES! [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.