Lee Plaza Restoration
LEE PLAZA RESTORATION »



Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1

    Default Why should we care if buildings in disrepair burn?

    Some of you may have heard about South Fulton, TN. Its city-funded fire department provides services to city residents and provides services to Obion county residents who pay subscription fee.

    This set up is common in rural areas where the outlying municipalities can't afford to fund a fire department. If a non-subscription paying county resident calls the fire department, the fire department will respond to make sure no human life is in danger. Then they let the house burn. [[If the neighbor is a subscription paying resident, the fire department will protect the neighbor's house from the fire spreading).

    Detroit should do something similar. If a condemned house [[or some other criteria, like delinquent property taxes?) structure is on fire, other than saving human life and protecting non-condemned structures, the DFD should let the structure burn. Thoughts?

  2. #2

    Default

    I was under the impression that that is the current policy. It was announced a few months ago and it created a lot of controversy.

  3. #3

    Default

    The policy here is to let a clearly abandoned house burn when the chief at the scene determines there is no danger to surrounding buildings.

    I can't see how that policy described by jolla would work in a big city. How do you determine if a house has delinquent property taxes while a fire is raging and people could be inside? Detroit has a huge problem with public safety response, and that problem is likely to grow more severe as cuts are made to fix the finances. But I'm not sure that's even a partial solution.

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by azafran View Post
    How do you determine if a house has delinquent property taxes while a fire is raging and people could be inside?
    How does South Fulton, TN do it?
    Last edited by jolla; January-20-12 at 12:50 PM. Reason: fixed quote tag

  5. #5

    Default

    The real question is why would Detroit follow the lead of South Fulton, TN?

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by iheartthed View Post
    The real question is why would Detroit follow the lead of South Fulton, TN?
    You're right; Detroit has it all figured out. Why improve on perfection?

    Abandonded, run-down houses are bad for the city. They provide places for criminal activity, they are set on fire, they pose a danger to kids, and they lower property values of the occupied houses. And really, they just make Detroit look like a craphole where no one [[who has other options) would want to live.

    Detroit needs money. Lower taxes on existing occupied homes and deterring people from moving in is NOT the way to go.

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jolla View Post
    You're right; Detroit has it all figured out. Why improve on perfection?
    Don't be dense. The question isn't "why would Detroit look to other places for solutions to its problems," the question is "what reason do we have to think that the problems of Detroit and the problems of some random small town in the rural South are remotely comparable?"

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jolla View Post
    You're right; Detroit has it all figured out. Why improve on perfection?
    Now you're putting words in my mouth.

    Quote Originally Posted by jolla View Post
    Abandonded, run-down houses are bad for the city. They provide places for criminal activity, they are set on fire, they pose a danger to kids, and they lower property values of the occupied houses. And really, they just make Detroit look like a craphole where no one [[who has other options) would want to live.
    Yet, burnt out carcasses of houses and buildings is supposed to do the opposite?

    Quote Originally Posted by jolla View Post
    Detroit needs money. Lower taxes on existing occupied homes and deterring people from moving in is NOT the way to go.
    Which assumes that taxes are the reason people are leaving Detroit in droves...

  9. #9

    Default

    Why should a city as big as Detroit follow the lead of a city that had 2,517 people living in it's 3.1 square miles in 2000? Detroit has around 700,000 people living in a city that has 139 square miles.

  10. #10

    Default

    We should secure and rehabilitate abandoned buildings, not destroy them or allow them to be destroyed.

  11. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 1953 View Post
    We should secure and rehabilitate abandoned buildings, not destroy them or allow them to be destroyed.
    The ones that aren't too far gone, yes.

  12. #12

    Default

    If they took away the tax loophole and went after the speculators and enforced the laws already on the books would this even be an issue ? Proactive or reactive which one is less costly.

  13. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 1953 View Post
    We should secure and rehabilitate abandoned buildings, not destroy them or allow them to be destroyed.
    In this particular city, in this economic climate, that's a pipe dream.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Instagram
BEST ONLINE FORUM FOR
DETROIT-BASED DISCUSSION
DetroitYES Awarded BEST OF DETROIT 2015 - Detroit MetroTimes - Best Online Forum for Detroit-based Discussion 2015

ENJOY DETROITYES?


AND HAVE ADS REMOVED DETAILS »





Welcome to DetroitYES! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
DetroitYES! is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to DetroitYES! [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.