Obamas nomination of Sotomayor

[vetalalumni]

Senate confirmation hearings are set to begin tomorrow morning. Senator John Cornyn [[R-TX) will press Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor [[on her record) during the proceedings, and promises not to be nasty. http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/...n/6526169.html

[Detroitej72]

I love how the right is making a big deal that 60% of her rulings were overturned by the Supreme Court. They use this as proof of her "activist" rulings.

What they forget to mention is that she only had something like 6 cases go to the S.C. and that Samuel Alito had 100%[[4) of his cases overturned before becoming a justice. Was he being an activist?

[ccbatson]

How and why they were turned over is important.

[Lorax]

The only activist judges on the Supreme Court are the Rethuglicans, who are taking up the issue of corporations again wanting to be given the same rights as individuals. Roberts agreed to hear it yet again.

[ccbatson]

Again, a pejorative from Lorax without even one example. For Sotamayor, the most recent example...the NJ fireman/Ricci case....ball's in your court Lorax.

[Detroitej72]

The Ricci case was a unanimous ruling by all the judges, and was based on past precedence. If you examine all her rulings, you see that the are very much middle of the road, hardly far left as the ditto heads would have you believe.

Most liberals feel she is too conservative and want a left's version of Scalia to balance things out.

[ccbatson]

Until she got a hold of it and suppressed the minority opinion from customary publication.

[vetalalumni]

Brilliant compound reverse racism.

• Reverse racism is misused terminology.
• Two or more what?

Any counters?

[ccbatson]

Misused how?

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/racism

Seems to be used quite correctly to me.

[vetalalumni]

ccbatson, for future reference, please understand if I neglect to engage in any real discussion with you. Let me say this, I've sometimes enjoyed reading your views. You are not on my automated 'Ignore List' because it sort of breaks the discussion flow.

[Lorax]

Again, a pejorative from Lorax without even one example. For Sotamayor, the most recent example...the NJ fireman/Ricci case....ball's in your court Lorax.

She only agreed with the lower court's decision, she herself did not preside over it. Stop carpetbombing the dialogue with non-issues.

[ccbatson]

She did pass judgement, she did suppress the dissenting opinion from being published, and HER DECISION was reversed and criticized by the supreme court.

How is it that the Supreme court would act as such, naming Sotamayor specifically, if she "only agreed with the lower court's decision"? Answer, she did much more than what you claim.

[Lorax]

She did pass judgement, she did suppress the dissenting opinion from being published, and HER DECISION was reversed and criticized by the supreme court.

How is it that the Supreme court would act as such, naming Sotamayor specifically, if she "only agreed with the lower court's decision"? Answer, she did much more than what you claim.

What planet are you living on? Sotomayor DID NOT RULE on this case. She merely sided with the municipality. No smoking gun, here, Sparky, just you feverish imagination.

[ccbatson]

Why did the Supreme Court specifically rebuff her then?

[vetalalumni]

The Supreme Court begins its new term Monday.

New term and new justice for nation's higher court
By MARK SHERMAN
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON [[AP) -- Justice David Souter never danced the salsa in public. Justice John Paul Stevens doesn't sing in karaoke bars. And Chief Justice John Roberts hasn't thrown out the first pitch at Yankee Stadium.

But that was yesterday's Supreme Court. The newest justice, Sonia Sotomayor, has done all three of those things - in the less than two months since she replaced Souter on the court.

While the Supreme Court is all about the law, personalities matter. As the court begins its new term Monday, the justices will be dealing not only with the cases in front of them but with a wild card: how Sotomayor and her effervescence may change things.

"It's like when you were little and a new kid joined the class," said Stephen Wermiel, a constitutional law professor at American University. "There was always a little air of excitement or anticipation because you didn't know how it would change the dynamic."

The earliest indications are that she is unlikely to affect the outcome or alter the terms of debate in two of the high-profile cases that probably will dominate the term: a challenge to limits on corporate spending in political campaigns and a lawsuit seeking to strike down local handgun bans in the Chicago area.

In both cases, conservative majorities that prevailed in earlier cases appear solid. Sotomayor probably will side with the court's liberals in dissent from decisions in favor of gun rights and loosening campaign finance restrictions, as the now-retired Souter did.

But other disputes loom and, to cite just one area, Sotomayor will be watched closely to see whether her past as a prosecutor makes her more sympathetic to law enforcement in criminal cases. Unlike her colleagues, Sotomayor also has experience as a trial judge.

The criminal docket includes challenges to handing out life sentences with no chance of parole to people younger than age 18. These cases follow the court's recent decision to bar the execution of people who committed murder as juveniles.

The court has scheduled arguments in First Amendment cases over the separation of church and state involving a cross in the Mojave National Preserve in California that serves as a World War I memorial, and free speech issues in the government's efforts to criminalize the production of videos of dog fights and other acts of animal cruelty.

The justices themselves say any change in the court matters.

"It's a new court. When I was trying jury cases, which is usually 12, if a juror had to be replaced because one was ill or something ... it's just a different dynamic. It was a different jury. And it's the same way here. This will be a very different court," Justice Anthony Kennedy said in an interview for C-SPAN's new documentary on the court.

Sotomayor is the third new justice on the court since 2005, when Roberts was confirmed as the first of President George W. Bush's two nominees. Justice Samuel Alito came on board early in 2006.

For the moment, Roberts and the other conservatives - Alito and Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas - continue to appear ascendant, joined by Kennedy, a swing voter who sides more often than not with the conservatives in cases with a clear ideological division.

Their biggest show of strength could come in the campaign finance case. It could result in the reversal of decades-old restrictions on corporate and union spending in elections and demonstrate the political importance of Bush's appointments.

"It's an enormous test for Chief Justice Roberts and the conservatives on the court. Dramatic changes in the law are being urged upon them," said Doug Kendall, leader of the liberal-leaning Constitutional Accountability Center public interest group that closely follows the court.

Indications are that more change in the makeup of the court could come soon. Justice John Paul Stevens, who turns 90 in April, acknowledged last month that he has so far hired fewer law clerks than usual for next year, a move widely considered to be a signal that he is at least contemplating retiring.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 76, appears well after her surgery for pancreatic cancer in February and has said she plans to serve into her early 80s. But the long-term prognosis for pancreatic cancer is poor.

The retirement of either justice would give President Barack Obama, who named Sotomayor, another nominee, although the ideological balance of the court probably would not change. For that to happen, one of the conservatives would have to leave during Obama's presidency. None of the current conservative justice has even hinted at retirement.

Deanne Maynard, a Supreme Court advocate at the Morrison and Foerster law firm and herself a former high court law clerk, said any short list of prospective nominees would include women, even if Stevens and not Ginsburg retires first.

"It's very intriguing, to me at least, that there'd be three women on the court," Maynard said.

---

On the Net:

Supreme Court: http://www.supremecourtus.gov/

[ccbatson]

Replacing another liberal is slightly reassuring...if we can just hold out until 2012 and Obama's exit.

[vetalalumni]

The Supreme Court: Home To America's Highest Court on c-span --> http://supremecourt.c-span.org/

Beginning Sunday October 4 at 9pm and continuing through that entire week--each night at 9pm -- C-SPAN will present groundbreaking and unique programs on the Supreme Court. Featuring our original documentary production "The Supreme Court: Home to America's Highest Court" as well as an unprecedented collection of original interviews with all 11 living current and former Supreme Court Justices, Supreme Court week will offer viewers a rare window into the Supreme Court and those that serve there. Here's our line-up of programs:

"The Supreme Court: Home To America's Highest Court"

[ccbatson]

Remember what the majority ideology is...for now, thankfully.