What does this have to do with the initial post? You just trolling?
Printable View
You're a real piece of work. I think you also need psychological help instead of drinking too much. You're trying to silence real issues by calling me a moron instead of debating with facts and research? What does that make you? I never said the average veteran is limbless, crazy and homeless. You're putting words in my mouth now. I cited a government statistic plus offered an anecdote and you inferred "average" and feel that gives you the right to call me names? THAT is a moronic response.
And since you don't have the the IQ to understand an analogy I use again you attack my character. I'm using an analogy to show how some people like to pretend that real issues don't exist because it never happened in their backyard yet, which is ignorance. But, go ahead and personally attack me, Heir Goebbels, for raising facts.
You need to go back to a real school instead of talking about your degree from a diploma mill like the University of Phoenix. If you're gonna argue, argue the points with facts instead of personally attacking people who bring up facts or leave.
The "government statistic" you produced was from 2008, Merlin.
I also didn't attack you, I said the posts were ignorant and moronic. I guess you were too busy playing sports at community college to learn reading comprehension.
Oh, now I see, you pretty much do this in every thread you post in. Getting high and mighty based on your posting history is quite hilarious, but not as hilarious as talking about someone dropping out of kindergarten, then spelling curriculum incorrectly. lololol
Why is a statistic invalid if it's from 2008? Where's the rest of YOUR argument?
You're calling me "Merlin" now? I guess you're comparing me to one of the best and most successful WWII aircraft engines built by one of the world's best carmakers, Rolls Royce. So, you're calling me "the best"? Thanks, I'll take that as a compliment.
You said that I'm the one who made a moronic statement instead of refuting the argument. That's an attack.
You tell me to formulate cogent thoughts, yet you don't offer up any cogent thoughts in response except attacking me. That's not showing any analytical skills whatsoever. That's not debating the merits.
Ya, you know someone really sucks at debating when their only response to an argument is an old typo from another thread made a long, long time ago.
Your posting history speaks for itself. Get back on your meds, Merlin.