It wasn't a leak, but fine, call it a leak. Call it whatever you want. That doesn't change the fact that it wasn't part of the DNC email release that
Gman suggested Seth Rich was responsible for. Seth Rich obviously did not hack John Podesta's emails even if you want to suggest that he did leak the DNC emails. Go back and read the original post of mine and the subsequent replies. He said the leaks stopped after Rich died. That was false, because there was only one leak [[the DNC email dump to wikileaks). So then the goal posts got moved by
Pam to "what about the Podesta emails?" Only someone who is truly insane would think that Seth Rich spear-phished John Podesta, because to imply that that was one of the "leaks" that stopped after Rich died would be to imply that Rich was somehow involved in the Podesta hack.
The simple fact is, there WAS NO ongoing leaks at the DNC. There was one release of information to Wikileaks, which may have been a leak from an insider or may have been hacking from an outside entity. If there were multiple releases of info from inside the DNC taking place over an extended period of time, that would point to an insider leaking information and not a outside hacking attack. That wasn't the case though. So Gman was wrong [[there weren't multiple leaks at the DNC) and Pam was wrong to suggest that the Podesta email hack proved that there was. Changing the word "hack" to the word "leak" doesn't change any of that.
For the record, it was the conclusion of the Department of Homeland Security and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence that the DNC emails were stolen by Russian hackers. This was the same conclusion come to by all of the top private cyber-security firms as well, including
CrowdStrike,
Fidelis Cybersecurity,
Mandiant,
SecureWorks, and
ThreatConnect. But I get it, you guys think that all of that is "fake news." Obviously, super spy Seth Rich not only leaked the DNC emails but also hacked John Podesta and then was murdered on the orders of Hillary Clinton.