Seems like we have heard this before, but then again what can you expect from a tabloid news channel?
http://m.www.yahoo.com/_ylt=AvVNGfGu...ws/ynews_ts988
Printable View
Seems like we have heard this before, but then again what can you expect from a tabloid news channel?
http://m.www.yahoo.com/_ylt=AvVNGfGu...ws/ynews_ts988
Stupid mistakes...they don't need to do it. Better fix it for good Fox.
Makes you wonder what other "technical mistakes" they make, and how often.
Funny how the "mistakes" always work to "enhance" support for their allegations, never the other way around. If they were merely incompetent, you would think it would be a 50/50 split...
Umm...no, it doesn't make you wonder that when you have rabid liberals in the white house dedicated to destroying Fox...they will not be missing anything.
So now the rabid liberals in the White House are vetting and fact-checking Fox's news reports? How inconvenient for Fox that somebody's actually paying attention to what they say. And for the White House--they have to suffer through watching all that crap.
And besides, it's only fair that the White House is dedicated to destroying Fox. Fox has been dedicated to destroying Obama since he started campaigning. They need to quit whining; if they're going to dish it out, they should be prepared to take it.
Assigned to do it...Her name is Anita Dunne...recently replaced after outed for being a fan of Mao.
According to you, if she was a fan of Mao, wouldn't she have been promoted?Quote:
Originally Posted by ccbatson
*shrug* Who she was a fan of is immaterial to this discussion. Yet another red herring.Quote:
Originally Posted by ccbatson
They'll find someone else to watch. And assigned or volunteer, the pertinant fact is that they're watching.
When conservatives have no defense, they attack the president and his staff.
Keep up the whining wing nuts, your making sure your party will remain on the fringes for the foreseeable future.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccbatson
yet again, bats shows he is only capable of parroting his wing-nut idols, as they are the only source of that comment
Destroying? Did you really use that word? Did Obama have his rabid liberal gestapo seize all their equipment, throw their editors in prison and burn down their building?Quote:
Originally Posted by ccbatson
They've [[finally) started calling Fox out on their repeated inaccuracies. That's called discourse, and it was long overdue.
I do understand why the Obama administration didn't waste the time or energy on it at first, because they've got much bigger things to worry about than a bunch of paranoid wingnuts yammering about nothing and inventing conspiracies. To engage with people like that is to stoop to their level. Obama would look like that poor, victimized, whiny Sarah Palin if he issued an angry tweet every time someone said something mean about him.
Not Obama, just some writers on the Daily Show caught it. They busted MSNBC [[they seem to be the liberal Fox now) as well.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sturge
My bad. Anita Dunn [[no "e") likened it to "the research arm of the Republican Party," without calling out any outright inaccuracies.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AEt180Wnls
The Daily Show was the one that caught the misused Tea Party footage at Bachmann's anti-health care rally.
"Dunn," no e.Quote:
Originally Posted by ccbatson
Here's more on the "fan of Mao" thing, which was a "huge controversy!!!!!" manufactured by your favorite courageous inventor of conspiracies, the Beckster. By the way, how can you be "outed" on something when it was taken from a speech you gave to a crowd? Usually "outing" someone means revealing their deep, dark secret. But I digress. Bats' choice of words never ceases to amuse.
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/10/...unn/index.html
If you read the article, you'll notice that she got the quote from Lee Atwater, and that other Republicans [[Karl Rove, Newt Gingrich) have quoted Mao in the past. I'm sure Beck left that out of his rant, though.
Here's the excerpt from the actual speech:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWbX_vsAGd4
except msnbc actually has shows by republicans as well [[joe scarborough), and their news shows don't run fake footage, like fox doesQuote:
Originally Posted by sturge
Alan Combs is on Fox...he is a lib.
Newsflash, its no longer Hannity & Colms, now just Hannity's own spin on events.
How's it feel to see your trusted news source caught red handed manipulating footage?
And Combs has his own show...Newsflash back at ya.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccbatson
That has absolutely NOTHING to do with the topic at hand......
You are losing your touch CC. You used to throw out better red herrings than that....
??? A precise response to Detroitej72 misunderstanding in #17 Detroit Stylin. How is that "not" the topic at hand?
Not to Defend Fox for their fuck up, but I'm sure if you review all the footage from any other station throughout the years, you will find similar gaffes. Big deal.
BTW, the Daily Show pointing it out was actually pretty funny.