But the people you claim are irrational are the very people parenting the children you are not worried about.
So how can irrational adults give rational guidance to children?
You still make no sense.
They can't, heaping propaganda on top of the misdirection or these parents is not going to make a difference. For that matter, only good and rational parenting makes a real difference. By analogy, the radical ideas conveyed in the Midrasa's in the middle east [[or wherever) do not make the children of radicals, radical, nor would teaching the opposite overturn the parental influence. It is barking up the wrong tree.
As defined by you.So you submit that regardless of what a child learns in school it cannot negate or overturn what that child learns at home from his/her parents?Quote:
makes a real difference. By analogy, the radical ideas conveyed in the Midrasa's in the middle east [[or wherever) do not make the children of radicals, radical, nor would teaching the opposite overturn the parental influence.?
Is that your position?
If the parents are doing a good job, yes.
Former First Lady Bush indicated recently her support for a President speaking to schoolkids. Then we learn that her husband was to speak to schoolkids in Arlington, Texas.
"A President" Maybe? A radical socialist who happens to be the POTUS? Not so much.
#205 speaks of GWB [[not a radical socialist) talking to school kids, held in contrast to Obama [[a definite radical socialist).
My post therefore directly addresses the immediately foregoing comment Elganned.
So to what does "not so much" relate?
That a radical socialist President speaking to schoolchildren is not being done for innocent purposes.
I'd sooner listen to a socialist radical President than an insane libertarian message board runner.
Yet here you are....
Objectivist btw, not libertarian.
I hate trolls.
Watch out! You might get snitched on.
Actually, Elganned has it close to correct there, not the derogatory part, but the part where an important distinction is present...twice tonight Elganned has hit close to the target, kudos.
Thanks. I live for your approval.
Just because you're wrong doesn't mean you should be mischaracterized.
Darn, I didn't want to encourage you.
Do you need anything more compelling to tell you that you have no concept of the meaning of the words you use than your use of the phrase "radical fascist"?
Your merciless slaughter of the language to suit your right-wing dogma isn't the discussion here, though it has been in the past.
You continually misuse the dictionary definition of words to suit your fascist propaganda.
We've had this discussion before, learn the meaning of words first, then you won't be pilloried by nearly everyone on this forum.
Unbelievable ignorance Lorax.
He [[Obama) is a fairly proficient deceiver...but the truth is slowly being revealed TO ALL.