OMG!
We're full on wikipedia now everyone!
Heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeehaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!
OMG!
We're full on wikipedia now everyone!
Heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeehaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!
So long as we're posting YT links.......
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QQroHLhDXM
....always a voice of reason IMO
snf=pown'd
SammyS=pown'd
I Stand with Barron Trump; he's gone through so much. Looks most fitting to assume the role of Ceasar and supposed wiz of the Internet. He's exploitoed like his mother but that is expected in Trumplandia:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZ4CyYMHEkA
snf = pown'd, on my trophy wall
SammyS = pown'd, on my trophy wall
Trumpeteers = punk'd, pown'd and right next to "Uncle Ted" on my stupid bitches trophy wall.
Does pown'd mean owned? :confused::rolleyes: Whatever, anyway, here's some background as to how Hillary lost it. You see, she conspired and thought she can play us all for fools. May have gotten away with it in the past but not this time.
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/i...rican-history/
Quote:
Clinton called this her “pied piper” strategy, that intentionally cultivated extreme right-wing presidential candidates and that would turn the Republicans away from their more moderate candidates. This enlisted mainstream media who then focused to Trump and raise him above all others assuming that would help Hillary for who would vote for Trump. This was a deliberate strategy all designed to propel Hillary to the White House.
Obviously, she underestimated the charismatic skills of a marketing genius.
Probably could have pulled it off with the other candidates but not The Donald.Quote:
The Clinton strategy was all about manipulating the Republicans to nominate the worst candidate. Clinton called for forcing “all Republican candidates to lock themselves into extreme conservative positions that will hurt them in a general election.”
It was not Putin trying to rig the elections, it was Hillary. Clinton saw the Republican field as crowded and she viewed as “positive” for her. “Many of the lesser known can serve as a cudgel to move the more established candidates further to the right.” Clinton then took the strategic position saying “we don’t want to marginalize the more extreme candidates, but make them more ‘Pied Piper’ candidates who actually represent the mainstream of the Republican Party.”
Her manipulative strategy was to have the press build up Donald Trump, Sen. Ted Cruz and Ben Carson. “We need to be elevating the Pied Piper candidates so that they are leaders of the pack and tell the press to them seriously.”
Quote:
This is by far the WORST campaign in history and it was all orchestrated by Hillary to be intentionally divisive for the nation all to win the presidency at all costs. She has torched the constitution and the country. No wonder Hillary could not go to the stage to thank her supporters. She never counted on them and saw the people as fools. The entire strategy was to take the White House with a manipulation of the entire election process. Just unbelievable.
.....AT ALL COSTS. I'll say it again, very untrustworthy and if I may add, miscalculating.
SammyS = pown'd, on my trophy wall, with a special ribbon that states "First in Class Bullshit Category".
And i donts minds if I puts that in bolds, y'all. Where's ma drink. Fuckin` don't gits all up in ma skirts, Bobbie Richie is a playin`, and I'm ah feeling reeeel cuntry rights abouts now.
[[that's right, I said cunt but at least least I didn't say "grab some pussy/cunt" I've got a little bit of class and that's for the President to say)
Post Withdrawn.
This thread has given me a preview of how truly awkward Thanksgiving is going to be.
Lowell, please lock this puppy up. It's got out of hand......:[[
Don't discuss politics or one may end up in throes of scene 2:30....:eek:....!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbXr-h_oz9I
Miscalculating for sure. A good outworking of this mess is that the black vote going forth can not be so assumed by the democrats. For decades they've felt they could put any democratic candidate before us and be guaranteed full-out allegiance, no questions asked. Umm, no.
I think more and more black voters are starting to realize, the democratic party, has played them like a fiddle over the years, and that's what helped Hillary lose the election. She didn't get nearly the black vote that Obama did. She concentrated on the black vote, and millennials and overlooked the white rural and mainstream ones.
For the purpose of discussion: if racism isn't a dirty word, then we can safely say that the division of voting blocks is a normal recurrence in the electorate. How can we claim, and I include Canada in this, that there is no such thing as a Society divided by ethnicity. In Canada, Harper's two terms in office came from disenchantment by immigrant groups traditionally beholdened to the Liberal agenda on multiculturalism. You can never take your so-called base for granted.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...mepage%2Fstory
Look it up. That is not just about numbers.
Why don't you name one of these "several untrue things". Please detail my "misinformation, exaggerations and hyperbole", please.
Not my fault you have your dates all wrong. Trump Tower Chicago [[which was a huuuge failure, BTW) was a development dating from the 1990's. It was repeatedly delayed and didn't break ground until after 9-11, but is, at this point, a 20 or 25 year old project.
And that failure is the last Trump project, anywhere. He hasn't built a thing since. In NYC, he hasn't built anything since the early 1990's, when he completed Trump Palace [[which I think was finally completed in '92).
Excepting TT Chicago [[which was such a turkey it STILL has extensive never-occupied space), everything you see "built" with the Trump name in the past quarter century is due to him licensing his name to developers. He has spent the last quarter century as a reality TV star, and living off proceeds from licensing his name to products and other developers.
Trump is such a joke in the development industry, because he has been toxic to banks and lenders for 30-40 years now. He was basically blackballed by the industry because he doesn't keep his promises, and doesn't pay his bills.
He has been a running joke in the NYC development world since the 80's, as a fraduluent "builder", who doesn't actually build much of anything, but now the joke is on the American people.
TT Chicago, BTW, might be the biggest buyer "disaster" as Trump would say, in modern U.S. skyscraper development. The hotel condo units that sold for $1,500 a foot can resell for less than $400 a foot. The project still has empty space, with no takers, and I believe they still have 100% vacancy on the retail space.
And Trump didn't really manage anything with TT Chicago. It was almost entirely Ivanka [[who is whip-smart and sane, BTW) and Eric Trump [[who is an idiot). I've met both, BTW, and actually know Ivanka and her husband [[J. Kushner).
Another flop is TT in Toronto. The promoters wanted to take The Rump's name down, a whole bunch of lawyerly folks on that one. Smells bad all around.
---The Rump. In case you missed it.
Yeh, I don't know about that.
http://www.chicagocondofinder.com/tr...wer-condos.php
Which is why Hillary received the vast majority of the black vote, and about the same % as Obama?
Black voter participation was down, probably because everyone thought the election was done-deal, but blacks aren't going to be voting for a know-nothing racist clown like Trump. Will never happen.
That's another failure, but in this case it isn't really a Trump property.
TT Toronto is one of the scam Trump-licensed properties, by an unrelated developer. Developers used to pay Trump to use his name, back when his name connoted "tacky luxury" to nouveaux riche third world types. That day is long gone.
And Trump stopped building stuff 20 years ago, when he became a reality star and licensed his name to Trump Steaks, Trump U, Trump Water and the like. He also had no choice, as banks/lenders cut off Trump Organization back in the 1990's.
Trump won on momentum specifically from those earning <$30k pa, hispanics and blacks. Hillarys feminist platform on the other hand won her a mere 1% over Obama. That's a pretty bad result from a negative and divisive campaign
https://youtu.be/yhUXSX3ZnpE
So the problem wasn't anything about the Democratic Party. It was all about what's wrong with Trump. Keep thinking that, Bham. Brilliant. But do not consider that you may be wrong -- or that there are other ideas about how to deal with issues.
I think its also worth noting that a non-trivial number of blacks DID VOTE FOR TRUMP. Are they stupid, too?
Something is going on, but with luck you won't notice it, and will justify it away. Yeah, it was the low turnout among people who think like me. Nothing about my ideas at all. I'm right.