Originally Posted by
oladub
ghettopalmetto, I don't think of it as drastic. Consider cities that have neighborhoods separated by bodies of water, ravines, military bases, hills, industrial areas, etc.. that disrupt the inter-connectivity of neighborhoods. It usually isn't an issue. Sometimes a bridge is built. Life goes on.
I was thinking about it from a different perspective. If there is a gated community of whatever type and size, the residents would constantly be spilling out to go to work and spend at restaurants and other places outside of their community. They would be hiring people from outside of their community to teach, repair their cars, mail their packages, etc.. Compared with listening to crickets on a humid summer night, the inclusion of any such new community, with or without walls, would ramp up commerce and connect a new neighborhood with existing ones.
Smart growth planners are often hostile to cul-de-sacs for the inter-connectivity reason you mentioned. However, studies taken of cul-de-sac residents show above average satisfaction with the intimacy of their neighborhood. I can't figure out why something that provided satisfaction would cause planners such grief. Then they try to say its because the snow plow has a more difficult time turning around. It sounds like an excuse. If they wanted efficiency we would all have to live in barracks.