One Billion Is Enough

Why wouldn't they NOT be involved in mass human extinction?

http://www.facts-are-facts.com/magaz...s-enough.ihtml

From About US @ Facts are Facts:

...it [FAF] differs from other magazines by basing the topics it publishes on the same spiritual-scientific laws whose rediscovery is the privilege of those living in the Aquarian Age. It does not ask questions of why and what, but presents facts that answer them. These include political events, the law of the vortex in nature, man's seven bodies and the true shape of the earth.

[Man's seven bodies??? The true shape of the earth???] And who are the "They" you are talking about?

Here's another article from FAF:
http://www.facts-are-facts.com/magaz...il-spill.ihtml

I need to start a "news" web site like that so I can profit from the credulousness of the populace. time to take advantage of Barnum's Law.

Your fun to play with Maxx. :D

ListVerse


Oakville Blobs


http://listverse.files.wordpress.com...pg?w=550&h=366
Q: What was the gelatinous substance that fell on Oakville, Washington in 1994?
On August 7, 1994, a bizarre gelatinous substance fell on the town of Oakville, which is a small logging community on the western edge of Washington State. Over a period of three weeks, the rain was spotted a total of six times, mostly in the middle of the night. By the afternoon of August 7, the residents of Oakville began to complain of a mysterious illness. They described having difficulty breathing, extreme vertigo, blurred vision, and an increased sense of nausea. One of the town’s residence Beverly Roberts was quoted as saying that everyone in town contracted a flu-like illness that lasted two to three months. Additionally, several cats and dogs that came into contact with the substance fell ill and died.
A sample of the substance was taken to a hospital and found to contain a large amount of human white blood cells, but nobody could identify how it came from the sky. The sample was then sent to the Washington State Department of Health for further study and determined to have two species of bacteria, one of which lives in the human digestive system. Because of the findings, the substance was initially speculated to be human waste from an airplane, but that was disproven. Evidence from the sample has supported the fact that the substance was alive.
Some people have linked the strange rain with a series of U.S. bombing runs that were carried out over the Pacific in August of 1994, while others are convinced that the town was used for a U.S. military experiment designed to test a new form of biological weapon. During the event, Oakville residents reported a significant, almost daily increase in the amount of slow-moving military aircraft in the skies over their town, but not much ground traffic was observed. Before the first rain was reported, a series of black helicopters were spotted in the area.
Some people have also connected the history of gelatinous rain with chemtrails in the United States. The chemtrail conspiracy holds that some trails left by streaking jets are actually chemical or biological agents deliberately sprayed at high altitudes for purposes undisclosed to the general public. There actually is a patent [[United States Patent 6,315,213) which describes a method for artificially modifying the weather by seeding rain clouds of a storm with suitable cross-linked aqueous polymer. However, the current benefit of such a process in unknown. Others have connected the Oakville blobs with the historic accounts of star jelly.

2

Question everything.

Believe nothing.

Believe everything.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_population_control

The means of controlling and regulating populations can be traced back to many cultures. "Infanticide, or the killing of infants and young children, has occurred since early times. In early Rome, the father was given complete power to kill, abandon, or even sell his child. In Greek legend, Odepus was doomed to death until he was rescued by a family retainer. In Hawaii, China, and Japan, many female or disabled children were killed to maintain a strong race without overpopulation. Infanticide was practiced for many reasons. Like the Hawaiians, Chinese, and Japanese, some cultures saw the practice of infanticide as a means of controlling and regulating the population so that society's resources could be expended on the strongest and most valuable [[Crosson, Cynthia)."

Present-day practice by countries
[edit] China

Main article: One-child policy
The most significant modern population control system is China's one-child policy, in which, with various exceptions, having more than one child is discouraged. Unauthorized births are punished by fines, although there have also been allegations of illegal forced abortions and forced sterilization.^[40]
The Chinese government introduced the policy in 1978 to alleviate the social and environmental problems of China.^[41] According to government officials, the policy has helped prevent 400 million births. The success of the policy has been questioned, and reduction in fertility has also been attributed to the modernization of China.^[42] The policy is controversial both within and outside of China because of the issues it raises, the manner in which the policy has been implemented and because of concerns about negative economic and social consequences.
[edit] India

Main article: Family planning in India
Only those with two or fewer children are eligible for election to a Gram panchayat, or local government.
We two, ours two [["Hum do, hamare do" in Hindi) is a slogan meaning one family, two children and is intended to reinforce the message of family planning thereby aiding population control.
[edit] Iran

Main article: Family planning in Iran
Iran has succeeded in sharply reducing its birth rate in recent years. Iran is the only country where mandatory contraceptive courses are required for both males and females before a marriage license can be obtained. The government emphasizes the benefits of smaller families and the use of contraception.^[43]
[edit] Singapore

Main article: Family planning in Singapore
[edit] United States

Enacted in 1970, Title X of the Public Health Service Act provides access to contraceptive services, supplies and information to those in need. Priority for services is given to people with low-incomes. The Title X Family Planning program is administered through the Office of Population Affairs under the Office of Public Health and Science. It is directed by the Office of Family Planning.^[44] In 2007, Congress appropriated roughly $283 million for family planning under Title X, at least 90 percent of which was used for services in family planning clinics.^[44] Title X is a vital source of funding for family planning clinics throughout the nation,^[45] which provide reproductive health care.
The education and services supplied by the Title X-funded clinics support young individuals and low-income families. The goals of developing healthy families are accomplished by helping individuals and couples decide whether to have children and when the appropriate time to do so would be.^[45]
Title X has made the prevention of unintended pregnancies possible.^[45] It has allowed millions of American women to receive necessary reproductive health care, plan their pregnancies and prevent abortions. Title X is dedicated exclusively to funding family planning and reproductive health care services.^[44]
Title X as a percentage of total public funding to family planning client services has steadily declined from 44% of total expenditures in 1980 to 12% in 2006. Medicaid has increased from 20% to 71% in the same time. In 2006, Medicaid contributed $1.3 billion to public family planning.^[46]

Iran has succeeded in sharply reducing its birth rate in recent years. Iran is the only country where mandatory contraceptive courses are required for both males and females before a marriage license can be obtained.

SORRY but this makes sense. There are people right here in the US that have no business having children.

Things gotta change folks or it will be forced change.

If 1 billion is enough, how do you propose dealing with the excess 6 billion who are already here? I definitely want a say in who goes.

If the author of the article is going to cite Gorbachev, then he should at least spell his name correctly.

So the subject of discussion appears to be Planned Parenthood and population control. But I can't tell where you stand. First you quote a conspiracy-mongering outlet which is hawking some crap about the Rockefellers, the "global elite", Planned Parenthood and WHO covering as many bases as possible. Then you quote reports on developing nations' attempts to control their populations. So just where do you stand? I don't think people should have more children than they can support. I think students should be taught responsible family planning and responsible sexual behavior. I know that some churches decry birth control as a form of genocide. A lot of religious groups seem to be trying to outpopulate their competition instead of reaching rational conclusions about the natural world and our place in it.

only one possible response to the last post:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0kJHQpvgB8