No surprises there.
http://www.detnews.com/article/20100...th-molestation
Printable View
No surprises there.
http://www.detnews.com/article/20100...th-molestation
Following in his leader's footsteps?
Only if he get acquitted - remember, despite being destroyed by both the gossipmongers and the mainstream media Jackson was never convicted.Quote:
Originally Posted by Meddle
And Michael Jackson paid $22M to his 1993 accuser of childhood sexual abuse which is proof that he wasn't guilty of any criminal action.
And that then-child has since denied it happened and his [[money hungry) father has committed suicide.Quote:
Originally Posted by eno
Wealthy celebrities are easy targets for extortion.
Is the Detroit News trying to become the NY Post? Clearly him being a school bus driver is more relevant to the story than him moonlighting as a Michael Jackson impersonator.
Keepin' it real!
Neither was OJ in California.Quote:
Originally Posted by lilpup
The Pope hasn't been convicted either and probably never will be. Doesn't mean he isn't guilty of shuffle pedophiles around so they could prey on more victims.
Your only proof of that is Jermaine Jackson's statement. One could just as easily say the father's death was made to appear to be a suicide and the son is in hiding.Quote:
Originally Posted by lilpup
Wealthy people can do a lot of foolish things with their money.
It is important for all impersonators to remember that they only have to emulate the star on stage.
This MJ impersonator isn't rich enough to have an amusement park in his backyard, so once in awhile he goes down to Cedar Pointe and pretends it's his backyard. Or sometimes he goes to the Detroit Zoo and hangs out at the monkey cages...not to mention the ice cream and candy stands.
Get real, according to your theory he could have just as easily targeted Montel. Does the fact that MJ was a creepy swish not enter into your thinking?Quote:
Originally Posted by lilpup
For people who really follow the Michael Jackson case, it is generally believed he was guilty of bad judgment, guilty of being too innocent himself, but he was not guilty of child molestation.
So if a guy "swishes" he is a pedophile? Gee, homophobic much?Quote:
Originally Posted by LL Cool D
If he swishes and sleeps in the same bed with little boys who aren't related to him, then it's a pretty good indication.Quote:
Originally Posted by ferntruth
Let's put it this way: Would you allow your young son to sleep in Michael Jackson's bed? I sure as hell wouldn't.
That's what you call life imitating art - or artist, in this case.