Did Charles Pugh slap Gary Brown in the face by saying that the money won during the whistleblower lawsuite should be paid back to the city?
Printable View
Did Charles Pugh slap Gary Brown in the face by saying that the money won during the whistleblower lawsuite should be paid back to the city?
Do you have any citation of Pugh making that statement?
Based on their joint appearance and responses on the PBS show "Am I Right?" a week ago Friday, I would venture to guess that the 2 top vote getters are going to be allies on the council.
Here is the link to that episode of Let It Rip. http://www.myfoxdetroit.com/dpp/news/let-it-rip-091112
There is no mention of Gary Brown returning any money to the City. What was talked about at the very end of the episode was the possibility of Michael Stefani having to pay a judgment against him for violating the confidentiality agreement. That money would go to the City. This is why you should cite the statements you claim are being made so we can check the veracity of what is claimed.
Where would the 2 million dollars come from. Stefani doesn't have it.
Sigh... "you wanna be startin' somethin'"...
In fact, not only shouldn't Councilman-elect Brown pay back a dime, the city better get ready for the late Tamara Greene's family to perhaps get justice someday. The fallout from the last administration is by no means over.
So you'll admit that there was no mention of Gary Brown by Charles Pugh in the Let It Rip episode you claimed.
There is no connection between Gary Brown and Mike Stefani in the confidentiality agreement lawsuit brought by Kwame.
Whatever affects Stefani has no bearing on Browns lawsuit award. It's been done, it's over with. While they are investigating Stefani, seems to me they should be going after thug KK's lawyers, City attorneys and anyone else who blatently lied while under oath during the lawsuit.
Mr. Stefani most likely represented Mr. Brown on a contingency basis [[i.e., no fee unless he collected a judgement). The standard rates for attorneys in such cases would be 1/3 of the judgement plus his expenses.
Mr. Brown collected a sizable judgement. Therefore, Mr. Stefani presumably has a sizable chunk of change.