Originally Posted by
Richard
Pennsylvania has a high level of abandonment in its big cities,every major city does.
I moved to Orlando in 1980,the downtown was abandoned,South Beach in Miami was a strip of apartments and motels/hotels that not that long ago the rat pack used to hang out at,all became widowless scrapped out hulks,that was abandoned,crackheads and hookers were the only ones hanging out there.
I left Minneapolis in the late 70s,at that time you could buy whatever you wanted from the city for $1 because there was so much abandonment.
I am not saying Detroit does not have its share of abandonment,but nobody can hold it against the city because 20-30 years ago,just about every major city looked the same way.
Like I posted before,the only thing Detroit is guilty of is being a late bloomer,it does have its advantages though,because you can draw off of what worked and what did not in the other cities.
A lot of cities that claim to be something that Detroit should strive for,would have never been rebuilt had it not been for natural disasters that brought millions in fed funds.
Charleston is sought after,but even in the 90s you could not give away historical mansions downtown and they were all chopped up into rental units,you would not want to be caught out on the streets after dark.
Hurricane blew through,fed rebuilding funds flowed,those same mansions are now in the $4-$6 million range.
Detroit does have a lot of catching up to do and it will get there,but the cities that people keep comparing her to,were just as bad not that long ago.