Trayvon Martin: Amazed no one has posted this....

[Johnnny5]

Sure they do. Simple logic. Is it self defense when YOUR actions caused another person to feel he had to defend himself? If they don't make that argument in the closing, they don't want to win this case.

If I was following you - i'm a very big person and some people think I can look pretty scary - would you feel you had the right to defend yourself against me? That is EXACTLY the case we have here. Zimmerman was the aggressor. Or do you dispute that he was following Martin [[who had every right to be where he was) around?

Again, you can't legally attack someone just because they are following you. We had this exact same discussion here last year, so I don't see a need to do so again.




Below is a link to an interview with former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani [[And a long time former prosecutor) who is discussing the case.




http://m.soundcloud.com/seanhannitys...sses-zimmerman

[rb336]

Again, you can't legally attack someone just because they are following you. We had this exact same discussion here last year, so I don't see a need to do so again.

but you are allowed to shoot the person who confronts you for following them. frankly, I fully buy that Martin confronted the much bigger Zimmerman. then he got the better of him. Then come the FACT that there was NOT A SINGLE TRACE of Martin on the gun. If it happened as Z said, when M was on top of him, M's blood would be on it. Z got pissed, having been bested by a small guy, and shot him. That scenario fits ALL of the evidence

and i don't give a damn what one right-wing jackass says on another right -wing jackass' show

[firstandten]

and i don't give a damn what one right-wing jackass says on another right -wing jackass' show

I do have some respect for Rudy "one trick pony" Giuliani but Hannity its tough to take anything he says or does seriously

[noise]

Again, you can't legally attack someone just because they are following you. We had this exact same discussion here last year, so I don't see a need to do so again.

That's true.

There is, however, a difference between what's right/wrong and what's legal. It would be nice if the pro-Zimmerman crowd would drop the righteous indignation and just accept the fact that the guy killed a lone kid walking home from the store. It's Zimmermans' actions that led to this situation.