Belanger Park River Rouge
NFL DRAFT THONGS DOWNTOWN DETROIT »



Results 1 to 25 of 178

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wheels View Post
    Can you please explain what mass transit has to do with moving truck traffic?
    Sure! Hopefully this won't sound condescending.

    Cars and trucks both use the same roads. The roads are designed to accommodate both types of vehicles.

    Trucks move goods.

    Cars move people.

    If our region invests heavily in mass transit, and people started favoring using mass transit instead of cars, then less people would use cars.

    If less people use cars, then that means that less people are using freeways and streets, or at the very least using them more efficiently.

    When there is less demand for our road network, then it doesn't need to be so robust and wide.


    So, mass transit means less cars, less cars means the need for less freeways. We can get rid of some the redundant freeways, while still providing freeways for trucks to move goods. Many of the freeways in Detroit are very redundant, the trucks don't need that kind of redundancy because their goals are more long term, and the convenience of I-96 vs I-94 doesn't matter as long as it can get them to Chicago and beyond.

  2. #2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 48307 View Post
    Sure! Hopefully this won't sound condescending.

    Cars and trucks both use the same roads. The roads are designed to accommodate both types of vehicles.

    Trucks move goods.

    Cars move people.

    If our region invests heavily in mass transit, and people started favoring using mass transit instead of cars, then less people would use cars.

    If less people use cars, then that means that less people are using freeways and streets, or at the very least using them more efficiently.

    When there is less demand for our road network, then it doesn't need to be so robust and wide.


    So, mass transit means less cars, less cars means the need for less freeways. We can get rid of some the redundant freeways, while still providing freeways for trucks to move goods. Many of the freeways in Detroit are very redundant, the trucks don't need that kind of redundancy because their goals are more long term, and the convenience of I-96 vs I-94 doesn't matter as long as it can get them to Chicago and beyond.
    Nice try, but here's what we really want to happen.

    1) More mass transit means Detroit becomes more vital.

    2) More vitality results in increased demand for Detroit, and more traffic.

    3) Mass transit fills to capacity and riders demonstrate against the State for withholding funds,

    4) Freeway use goes up because Detroit's the place to be, and drivers recall state legislators who refuse to spend the excess income tax revenue money created by Detroit's increased economy on roads.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Instagram
BEST ONLINE FORUM FOR
DETROIT-BASED DISCUSSION
DetroitYES Awarded BEST OF DETROIT 2015 - Detroit MetroTimes - Best Online Forum for Detroit-based Discussion 2015

ENJOY DETROITYES?


AND HAVE ADS REMOVED DETAILS »





Welcome to DetroitYES! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
DetroitYES! is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to DetroitYES! [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.