rb336: Where, exactly, do I even imply two wrongs make a right?
Your two most recent examples:

" There is a large amount of precedence for sending troops into action that does not constitute war, and thus falls under the sole aegis of the President."

"Presidents have been doing far more than that since the early 19th century"

Congress didn't send troops, Bush did. by stating such, you have, yet again, displayed a skewed and historically wrong impression of the constitution.
"The war in Afghanistan was authorized when Congress passed and President Bush signed an authorization of use of military force.

Specifically it provided:
"That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons." -http://tammybaldwin.house.gov/issues/iraq-afghanistan.shtml

Note that Congress didn't authorize nation building.

All of those you cite are ideologues, I am not. North being against it pretty much enhances the rightness of the action.
Kucinich, Nader, Chomsky are ideologues but you aren't ? Even Ollie North has come around somewhat but you are still supporting executive fiat bombings of other nation's capitals from your basement or wherever.

AQ are opportunists. Libya provided refuge for allegedly "reformed" AQ members and contributed to the same activities the Saudis have. The difference between Libya & the house of saud is that the libyans blew up an American jet.
The British burned down Washington, maybe we should bomb London too? Taking down that jet was reprehensible but that was a long time ago. Libya already got bombed for that. How about bombing Libya again 30 years from now for good measure? Since then, Libya even voluntarily ended its nuclear program. Obama's attack on Libya has so far resulted in the massacre and torture of black workers living in Libya and the expansion of Al Queda in Libya. To be sure, these are probably the unintended consequences of our peace prize winning community organizer and constitutional scholar who might be in over his head.