Belanger Park River Rouge
NFL DRAFT THONGS DOWNTOWN DETROIT »



Results 1 to 24 of 24

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Default

    Detroit; good enough for a warehouse, not good enough for a store, apparently.

  2. #2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by K-slice View Post
    Detroit; good enough for a warehouse, not good enough for a store, apparently.
    Politics. Purely Politics. There is plenty of land near the downtown area to open a Target store. Bedrock could had allowed a City Target in one of it's empty storefronts. I could had seen a Target opening in one of the strip malls along Jefferson

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by K-slice View Post
    Detroit; good enough for a warehouse, not good enough for a store, apparently.
    It probably is good practice to have a warehouse in order to stock the store and there would no reason to have a warehouse unless there are multiple stores.

    Unless the city of Detroit only has room for one store,then it would not be economically feasible to put it there in the first place.

    I see it a heck of a lot more positive then negative,it’s Target and kinda like M&Ms you cannot just have one.

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Richard View Post
    It probably is good practice to have a warehouse in order to stock the store and there would no reason to have a warehouse unless there are multiple stores.

    Unless the city of Detroit only has room for one store,then it would not be economically feasible to put it there in the first place.

    I see it a heck of a lot more positive then negative,it’s Target and kinda like M&Ms you cannot just have one.
    I don't follow your point. The warehouse is inside the city limits at 8 mile. It's located where it is, as I said, because it allows city employees easy access to get there and because it is central to many of its suburban store locations. Locating one or more stores inside the city would also be convenient to this location.

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 401don View Post
    I don't follow your point. The warehouse is inside the city limits at 8 mile. It's located where it is, as I said, because it allows city employees easy access to get there and because it is central to many of its suburban store locations. Locating one or more stores inside the city would also be convenient to this location.
    What?

    You did not follow my point but you reworded it and presented it.

    It is located where it is because it was incentivize to locate there and they would not be building it unless they were planning future expansion of multiple stores which translates into a higher possibility that the city will not only see one store but multiple stores in the future,the near future.

    How employees get to work is not their problem,but the fairgrounds does have a transportation hub for rail and bus so ot would be on the city to provide transportation alternatives for city residents in order to get there.

    There are a lot of warehouses,tech centers and other businesses planned for the future there but if the region cannot figure out a way to come up with some transportation options then it will be to their detriment.

    It’s not on the locating business to provide or care about how people get there,buy a car and drive there if you want a job.

    But that is also what most cities take into account when they are promoting open for business incentives,it is not for the business,transportation is for the ease of residents to find employment.

    Factories in the south are located out in the middle of nowhere,if you want a job there,you figure out a way to get there.

    In an urban setting with high unemployment,it is usually on the city to help those residents increase their standard of living by helping them get to the work centers by providing mass transit.

    If a city is not interested in investing in its citizens future how can you expect a company to?

    When all of those businesses left the city and located to the suburbs,they did not do it to be closer or make it easier for employees to get there,actually made it worse because if you did not have a car you walked or rode a bike,there was no buses or established transit options that were already in place in the city.

    They left the city for the same reason everybody else did at the time.

    On top of everything else the burbs offered cheaper tax rates and land costs.

    People in California ride mass transit trains into the city because they can only afford a house further out,sometimes 2 hours each way,the employer are not saying gee let me move my company out closer to you in order to make it easier on your transportation needs.

    That short lived movement of employees dictating to employers on under what conditions they will work or they will join in the great resignation,is over with,most of those people have gone back to their old jobs.

    Because the bills came due.

    You cannot base a trend that happens in a small window in time and think that that is how it is going to be for ever.

    We have had the luxury of a rolling economy for 7 years now,it will not last forever,1970s 80s 90s 2000s all had recessions like clockwork every 8 -10 years,they have to happen in order to keep things in check,the country actually needs one now in order to lower the cost of living that is out f control.

    When that happens nobody is going to be placing demands on business looking to locate and provide jobs,cities will be begging for them because jobs will become scarce.

    That’s why it is on the city to prepare for that,not to entice the businesses to locate there but for when they do,the residents have every possible option available in order to get to that job.

    But sense people do not seem to care about that anyways,I will stand by what I said originally,they would not be building a distribution center if they were not planning an expansion,and they would not be spending millions on a distribution center to just supply one store,so it is good news for Detroit because it looks like you are about to get some options and not just one.

    This could be very well why the proposed target in the city was put on hold,without a local distribution center it would have been very expensive to stock and when you are talking about only making a few pennies on every item sold,every penny counts.

    Not to shabby either,Target is no way in the same class as Wal-Mart or other dollar stores.

    So the bar has been raised. You could have easily gotten a Wal-Mart but you were looking for better and by all appearances that’s what you will be getting.
    Last edited by Richard; July-11-23 at 06:58 PM.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Richard View Post
    What?

    You did not follow my point but you reworded it and presented it.

    It is located where it is because it was incentivize to locate there and they would not be building it unless they were planning future expansion of multiple stores which translates into a higher possibility that the city will not only see one store but multiple stores in the future,the near future.

    How employees get to work is not their problem,but the fairgrounds does have a transportation hub for rail and bus so ot would be on the city to provide transportation alternatives for city residents in order to get there.

    There are a lot of warehouses,tech centers and other businesses planned for the future there but if the region cannot figure out a way to come up with some transportation options then it will be to their detriment.

    It’s not on the locating business to provide or care about how people get there,buy a car and drive there if you want a job.

    But that is also what most cities take into account when they are promoting open for business incentives,it is not for the business,transportation is for the ease of residents to find employment.

    Factories in the south are located out in the middle of nowhere,if you want a job there,you figure out a way to get there.

    In an urban setting with high unemployment,it is usually on the city to help those residents increase their standard of living by helping them get to the work centers by providing mass transit.

    If a city is not interested in investing in its citizens future how can you expect a company to?

    When all of those businesses left the city and located to the suburbs,they did not do it to be closer or make it easier for employees to get there,actually made it worse because if you did not have a car you walked or rode a bike,there was no buses or established transit options that were already in place in the city.

    They left the city for the same reason everybody else did at the time.

    On top of everything else the burbs offered cheaper tax rates and land costs.

    People in California ride mass transit trains into the city because they can only afford a house further out,sometimes 2 hours each way,the employer are not saying gee let me move my company out closer to you in order to make it easier on your transportation needs.

    That short lived movement of employees dictating to employers on under what conditions they will work or they will join in the great resignation,is over with,most of those people have gone back to their old jobs.

    Because the bills came due.

    You cannot base a trend that happens in a small window in time and think that that is how it is going to be for ever.

    We have had the luxury of a rolling economy for 7 years now,it will not last forever,1970s 80s 90s 2000s all had recessions like clockwork every 8 -10 years,they have to happen in order to keep things in check,the country actually needs one now in order to lower the cost of living that is out f control.

    When that happens nobody is going to be placing demands on business looking to locate and provide jobs,cities will be begging for them because jobs will become scarce.

    That’s why it is on the city to prepare for that,not to entice the businesses to locate there but for when they do,the residents have every possible option available in order to get to that job.

    But sense people do not seem to care about that anyways,I will stand by what I said originally,they would not be building a distribution center if they were not planning an expansion,and they would not be spending millions on a distribution center to just supply one store,so it is good news for Detroit because it looks like you are about to get some options and not just one.

    This could be very well why the proposed target in the city was put on hold,without a local distribution center it would have been very expensive to stock and when you are talking about only making a few pennies on every item sold,every penny counts.

    Not to shabby either,Target is no way in the same class as Wal-Mart or other dollar stores.

    So the bar has been raised. You could have easily gotten a Wal-Mart but you were looking for better and by all appearances that’s what you will be getting.
    Richard I stand corrected. Having a supply warehouse for Target isn't bad for the city. I still wish that Target don't wait on City Club to be built just for it to set up shop. There are parcels of land on Jefferson next to or near Rivertown Market where Target could be built. There are also empty storefronts that run along Woodward near Grand Blvd that combined could hold a city Target

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stasu1213 View Post
    Richard I stand corrected. Having a supply warehouse for Target isn't bad for the city. I still wish that Target don't wait on City Club to be built just for it to set up shop. There are parcels of land on Jefferson next to or near Rivertown Market where Target could be built. There are also empty storefronts that run along Woodward near Grand Blvd that combined could hold a city Target
    No worries.

    it is still listed on their corporate site as a future location but that does not mean much,we do not know the details in all of that it could have been a build to suit situation and there was problems getting funding.

    But that’s speculation on my part,they could very well be scouting other locations.

    I do not know how accurate the search thing is but the other locations have been in the state for 60 some years.

    But if they are establishing in the city of Detroit,they are probably looking at multiple locations in order to gain market share before others jump in,they have been on a large expansion plan sense 2020,with the other established locations in the state they would have had to have a distribution center already,building a new one at the fairgrounds puts them on the opposite end of the other locations when you look at a centralized distribution center.

    So they are either setting that one up with expansion in mind or the ability to home deliver with a set time frame,but they like their stores and put a lot of effort into the customer experience,not so much geared towards online ordering.

    I shop at Target have been for 50 years and it seems like their market is mid range income,not to low and not to high that’s probably going to be the income range of the éreas they will look at,but they are also going to be looking at short term and long term goals if they look at where the movement within the city is trending,they may establish a location that will have you scratching your head.

    It’s just good business sense to establish now in Detroit before other players,but once Target establishes in the city the other players will come in because that is what they do,compete for market share against their competitors.

    Which is good because you will then have what you need,multiple options,a long time coming and not soon enough but at least it is promising news and gives hope and forward movement in the city.

    I think the city still has things in place that requires city residents in the construction and employment aspect on a percentage base,but that was according to the tax incentives and other investment incentives provided by the city taxpayers.

    That part we do not know about yet or has not been disclosed yet or even if they asked for or received.

    Somebody posted that question,that is or was the conditions that the city was requiring a percentage of city residents involved in the construction and employment part of they received taxpayer funds,which really is reasonable.

    A city can give preference to women or minority owned businesses for city contracts but they cannot dictate or force a private company to,it does not matter anyways if you want to get a city contract it is easy enough to find a woman or a minority as a straw owner for the length of that contract.
    Last edited by Richard; July-11-23 at 11:08 PM.

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Richard View Post
    No worries.

    it is still listed on their corporate site as a future location but that does not mean much,we do not know the details in all of that it could have been a build to suit situation and there was problems getting funding.

    But that’s speculation on my part,they could very well be scouting other locations.

    I do not know how accurate the search thing is but the other locations have been in the state for 60 some years.

    But if they are establishing in the city of Detroit,they are probably looking at multiple locations in order to gain market share before others jump in,they have been on a large expansion plan sense 2020,with the other established locations in the state they would have had to have a distribution center already,building a new one at the fairgrounds puts them on the opposite end of the other locations when you look at a centralized distribution center.

    So they are either setting that one up with expansion in mind or the ability to home deliver with a set time frame,but they like their stores and put a lot of effort into the customer experience,not so much geared towards online ordering.

    I shop at Target have been for 50 years and it seems like their market is mid range income,not to low and not to high that’s probably going to be the income range of the éreas they will look at,but they are also going to be looking at short term and long term goals if they look at where the movement within the city is trending,they may establish a location that will have you scratching your head.

    It’s just good business sense to establish now in Detroit before other players,but once Target establishes in the city the other players will come in because that is what they do,compete for market share against their competitors.

    Which is good because you will then have what you need,multiple options,a long time coming and not soon enough but at least it is promising news and gives hope and forward movement in the city.

    I think the city still has things in place that requires city residents in the construction and employment aspect on a percentage base,but that was according to the tax incentives and other investment incentives provided by the city taxpayers.

    That part we do not know about yet or has not been disclosed yet or even if they asked for or received.

    Somebody posted that question,that is or was the conditions that the city was requiring a percentage of city residents involved in the construction and employment part of they received taxpayer funds,which really is reasonable.

    A city can give preference to women or minority owned businesses for city contracts but they cannot dictate or force a private company to,it does not matter anyways if you want to get a city contract it is easy enough to find a woman or a minority as a straw owner for the length of that contract.
    I had attended the Light up Livernois event a few weeks back. I was still impressed by the modern design streetscape. I was still disappointed that that nothing had really changed as far as retail is concern on the strip. It's true that most of the businesses are minority owned or controlled. However, those businesses only catered to a % of the populac who live in the surrounding areas such as Palmer Woods, Sherwood Forest, and Green Acres. Sadly the new structure that was constructed on the southwest corner of Livernois and 7 mile is going to house a cigar Bae and a restaurant instead of the middle end retail that the developer intended it to house. The two minority owned coffee shop had failed and are currently closed. A Starbucks would had great on that strip that has a dedicated staff that are willing to come to work. It appears to me that there's a push to make or keep that strip a minority controlled strip. I also wonder are national chain or non minority retailers are being shut out from opening on that strip? Bigby had tried operating a cafe on the strip after years of delay only to shut its doors after one year. PetSmart, the vacuum cleaner store, CVS, and Footlocker are the only chain stores on that strip. The strip should be versatile when it comes to retail and restaurants. There need to be something that will draw out the money in the surrounding areas as well as the college students from nearby UofD and other nearby colleges.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Instagram
BEST ONLINE FORUM FOR
DETROIT-BASED DISCUSSION
DetroitYES Awarded BEST OF DETROIT 2015 - Detroit MetroTimes - Best Online Forum for Detroit-based Discussion 2015

ENJOY DETROITYES?


AND HAVE ADS REMOVED DETAILS »





Welcome to DetroitYES! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
DetroitYES! is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to DetroitYES! [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.