The only way to stop a clumsy 5-year-old with a gun is an astute 5-year-old with a gun. The sister should have been armed, and if she was, this tragedy would have never happened. Instead, the OP wants to remove guns from all youngsters. That is not the solution. The solution is to better arm youngsters so these things can't happen in the future. We put armed guards in our banks where we keep our money to make sure that our cash is protected, why not an armed guard in front of every home? Or do you not love the children enough to protect them too?
Bookmarks